Cargando…

Pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing in Malawi

INTRODUCTION: Community-based strategies can extend coverage of HIV testing and diagnose HIV at earlier stages of infection but can be costly to implement. We evaluated the costs and effects of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in Mangochi District, Malawi. METHODS: This economic ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Indravudh, Pitchaya P, Fielding, Katherine, Sande, Linda A, Maheswaran, Hendramoorthy, Mphande, Saviour, Kumwenda, Moses K, Chilongosi, Richard, Nyirenda, Rose, Johnson, Cheryl C, Hatzold, Karin, Corbett, Elizabeth L, Terris-Prestholt, Fern
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004593
_version_ 1783723941737529344
author Indravudh, Pitchaya P
Fielding, Katherine
Sande, Linda A
Maheswaran, Hendramoorthy
Mphande, Saviour
Kumwenda, Moses K
Chilongosi, Richard
Nyirenda, Rose
Johnson, Cheryl C
Hatzold, Karin
Corbett, Elizabeth L
Terris-Prestholt, Fern
author_facet Indravudh, Pitchaya P
Fielding, Katherine
Sande, Linda A
Maheswaran, Hendramoorthy
Mphande, Saviour
Kumwenda, Moses K
Chilongosi, Richard
Nyirenda, Rose
Johnson, Cheryl C
Hatzold, Karin
Corbett, Elizabeth L
Terris-Prestholt, Fern
author_sort Indravudh, Pitchaya P
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Community-based strategies can extend coverage of HIV testing and diagnose HIV at earlier stages of infection but can be costly to implement. We evaluated the costs and effects of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in Mangochi District, Malawi. METHODS: This economic evaluation was based within a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial of 30 group village heads and their catchment areas comparing the community-led HIVST intervention in addition to the standard of care (SOC) versus the SOC alone. The intervention involved mobilising community health groups to lead 7-day HIVST campaigns including distribution of HIVST kits. The SOC included facility-based HIV testing services. Primary costings estimated economic costs of the intervention and SOC from the provider perspective, with costs annualised and measured in 2018 US$. A postintervention survey captured individual-level data on HIV testing events, which were combined with unit costs from primary costings, and outcomes. The incremental cost per person tested HIV-positive and associated uncertainty were estimated. RESULTS: Overall, the community-led HIVST intervention costed $138 624 or $5.70 per HIVST kit distributed, with test kits and personnel the main contributing costs. The SOC costed $263 400 or $4.57 per person tested. Individual-level provider costs were higher in the community-led HIVST arm than the SOC arm (adjusted mean difference $3.77, 95% CI $2.44 to $5.10; p<0.001), while the intervention effect on HIV positivity varied based on adjustment for previous diagnosis. The incremental cost per person tested HIV positive was $324 but increased to $1312 and $985 when adjusting for previously diagnosed self-testers or self-testers on treatment, respectively. Community-led HIVST demonstrated low probability of being cost-effective against plausible willingness-to-pay values, with HIV positivity a key determinant. CONCLUSION: Community-led HIVST can provide HIV testing at a low additional unit cost. However, adding community-led HIVST to the SOC was not likely to be cost-effective, especially in contexts with low prevalence of undiagnosed HIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03541382.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8287609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82876092021-07-30 Pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing in Malawi Indravudh, Pitchaya P Fielding, Katherine Sande, Linda A Maheswaran, Hendramoorthy Mphande, Saviour Kumwenda, Moses K Chilongosi, Richard Nyirenda, Rose Johnson, Cheryl C Hatzold, Karin Corbett, Elizabeth L Terris-Prestholt, Fern BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Community-based strategies can extend coverage of HIV testing and diagnose HIV at earlier stages of infection but can be costly to implement. We evaluated the costs and effects of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in Mangochi District, Malawi. METHODS: This economic evaluation was based within a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial of 30 group village heads and their catchment areas comparing the community-led HIVST intervention in addition to the standard of care (SOC) versus the SOC alone. The intervention involved mobilising community health groups to lead 7-day HIVST campaigns including distribution of HIVST kits. The SOC included facility-based HIV testing services. Primary costings estimated economic costs of the intervention and SOC from the provider perspective, with costs annualised and measured in 2018 US$. A postintervention survey captured individual-level data on HIV testing events, which were combined with unit costs from primary costings, and outcomes. The incremental cost per person tested HIV-positive and associated uncertainty were estimated. RESULTS: Overall, the community-led HIVST intervention costed $138 624 or $5.70 per HIVST kit distributed, with test kits and personnel the main contributing costs. The SOC costed $263 400 or $4.57 per person tested. Individual-level provider costs were higher in the community-led HIVST arm than the SOC arm (adjusted mean difference $3.77, 95% CI $2.44 to $5.10; p<0.001), while the intervention effect on HIV positivity varied based on adjustment for previous diagnosis. The incremental cost per person tested HIV positive was $324 but increased to $1312 and $985 when adjusting for previously diagnosed self-testers or self-testers on treatment, respectively. Community-led HIVST demonstrated low probability of being cost-effective against plausible willingness-to-pay values, with HIV positivity a key determinant. CONCLUSION: Community-led HIVST can provide HIV testing at a low additional unit cost. However, adding community-led HIVST to the SOC was not likely to be cost-effective, especially in contexts with low prevalence of undiagnosed HIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03541382. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8287609/ /pubmed/34275869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004593 Text en © World Health Organization 2023. Licensee BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/igo/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (CC BY NC 3.0 IGO (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/igo/) ), which permits use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.Disclaimer: The author is a staff member of the World Health Organization. The author alone is responsible for the views expressed in this publication and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the World Health Organization.
spellingShingle Original Research
Indravudh, Pitchaya P
Fielding, Katherine
Sande, Linda A
Maheswaran, Hendramoorthy
Mphande, Saviour
Kumwenda, Moses K
Chilongosi, Richard
Nyirenda, Rose
Johnson, Cheryl C
Hatzold, Karin
Corbett, Elizabeth L
Terris-Prestholt, Fern
Pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing in Malawi
title Pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing in Malawi
title_full Pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing in Malawi
title_fullStr Pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing in Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing in Malawi
title_short Pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing in Malawi
title_sort pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of hiv self-testing in malawi
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004593
work_keys_str_mv AT indravudhpitchayap pragmaticeconomicevaluationofcommunityleddeliveryofhivselftestinginmalawi
AT fieldingkatherine pragmaticeconomicevaluationofcommunityleddeliveryofhivselftestinginmalawi
AT sandelindaa pragmaticeconomicevaluationofcommunityleddeliveryofhivselftestinginmalawi
AT maheswaranhendramoorthy pragmaticeconomicevaluationofcommunityleddeliveryofhivselftestinginmalawi
AT mphandesaviour pragmaticeconomicevaluationofcommunityleddeliveryofhivselftestinginmalawi
AT kumwendamosesk pragmaticeconomicevaluationofcommunityleddeliveryofhivselftestinginmalawi
AT chilongosirichard pragmaticeconomicevaluationofcommunityleddeliveryofhivselftestinginmalawi
AT nyirendarose pragmaticeconomicevaluationofcommunityleddeliveryofhivselftestinginmalawi
AT johnsoncherylc pragmaticeconomicevaluationofcommunityleddeliveryofhivselftestinginmalawi
AT hatzoldkarin pragmaticeconomicevaluationofcommunityleddeliveryofhivselftestinginmalawi
AT corbettelizabethl pragmaticeconomicevaluationofcommunityleddeliveryofhivselftestinginmalawi
AT terrisprestholtfern pragmaticeconomicevaluationofcommunityleddeliveryofhivselftestinginmalawi