Cargando…
The cost effectiveness and optimal configuration of HIV self-test distribution in South Africa: a model analysis
BACKGROUND: HIV self-testing (HIVST) has been shown to be acceptable, feasible and effective in increasing HIV testing uptake. Novel testing strategies are critical to achieving the UNAIDS target of 95% HIV-positive diagnosis by 2025 in South Africa and globally. METHODS: We modelled the impact of s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005598 |
_version_ | 1783723945803907072 |
---|---|
author | Jamieson, Lise Johnson, Leigh F Matsimela, Katleho Sande, Linda Alinafe d'Elbée, Marc Majam, Mohammed Johnson, Cheryl Chidarikire, Thato Hatzold, Karin Terris-Prestholt, Fern Nichols, Brooke Meyer-Rath, Gesine |
author_facet | Jamieson, Lise Johnson, Leigh F Matsimela, Katleho Sande, Linda Alinafe d'Elbée, Marc Majam, Mohammed Johnson, Cheryl Chidarikire, Thato Hatzold, Karin Terris-Prestholt, Fern Nichols, Brooke Meyer-Rath, Gesine |
author_sort | Jamieson, Lise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: HIV self-testing (HIVST) has been shown to be acceptable, feasible and effective in increasing HIV testing uptake. Novel testing strategies are critical to achieving the UNAIDS target of 95% HIV-positive diagnosis by 2025 in South Africa and globally. METHODS: We modelled the impact of six HIVST kit distribution modalities (community fixed-point, taxi ranks, workplace, partners of primary healthcare (PHC) antiretroviral therapy (ART) patients), partners of pregnant women, primary PHC distribution) in South Africa over 20 years (2020–2039), using data collected alongside the Self-Testing AfRica Initiative. We modelled two annual distribution scenarios: (A) 1 million HIVST kits (current) or (B) up to 6.7 million kits. Incremental economic costs (2019 US$) were estimated from the provider perspective; assumptions on uptake and screening positivity were based on surveys of a subset of kit recipients and modelled using the Thembisa model. Cost-effectiveness of each distribution modality compared with the status-quo distribution configuration was estimated as cost per life year saved (estimated from life years lost due to AIDS) and optimised using a fractional factorial design. RESULTS: The largest impact resulted from secondary HIVST distribution to partners of ART patients at PHC (life years saved (LYS): 119 000 (scenario A); 393 000 (scenario B)). However, it was one of the least cost-effective modalities (A: $1394/LYS; B: $4162/LYS). Workplace distribution was cost-saving ($52–$76 million) and predicted to have a moderate epidemic impact (A: 40 000 LYS; B: 156 000 LYS). An optimised scale-up to 6.7 million tests would result in an almost threefold increase in LYS compared with a scale-up of status-quo distribution (216 000 vs 75 000 LYS). CONCLUSION: Optimisation-informed distribution has the potential to vastly improve the impact of HIVST. Using this approach, HIVST can play a key role in improving the long-term health impact of investment in HIVST. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8287627 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82876272021-07-30 The cost effectiveness and optimal configuration of HIV self-test distribution in South Africa: a model analysis Jamieson, Lise Johnson, Leigh F Matsimela, Katleho Sande, Linda Alinafe d'Elbée, Marc Majam, Mohammed Johnson, Cheryl Chidarikire, Thato Hatzold, Karin Terris-Prestholt, Fern Nichols, Brooke Meyer-Rath, Gesine BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: HIV self-testing (HIVST) has been shown to be acceptable, feasible and effective in increasing HIV testing uptake. Novel testing strategies are critical to achieving the UNAIDS target of 95% HIV-positive diagnosis by 2025 in South Africa and globally. METHODS: We modelled the impact of six HIVST kit distribution modalities (community fixed-point, taxi ranks, workplace, partners of primary healthcare (PHC) antiretroviral therapy (ART) patients), partners of pregnant women, primary PHC distribution) in South Africa over 20 years (2020–2039), using data collected alongside the Self-Testing AfRica Initiative. We modelled two annual distribution scenarios: (A) 1 million HIVST kits (current) or (B) up to 6.7 million kits. Incremental economic costs (2019 US$) were estimated from the provider perspective; assumptions on uptake and screening positivity were based on surveys of a subset of kit recipients and modelled using the Thembisa model. Cost-effectiveness of each distribution modality compared with the status-quo distribution configuration was estimated as cost per life year saved (estimated from life years lost due to AIDS) and optimised using a fractional factorial design. RESULTS: The largest impact resulted from secondary HIVST distribution to partners of ART patients at PHC (life years saved (LYS): 119 000 (scenario A); 393 000 (scenario B)). However, it was one of the least cost-effective modalities (A: $1394/LYS; B: $4162/LYS). Workplace distribution was cost-saving ($52–$76 million) and predicted to have a moderate epidemic impact (A: 40 000 LYS; B: 156 000 LYS). An optimised scale-up to 6.7 million tests would result in an almost threefold increase in LYS compared with a scale-up of status-quo distribution (216 000 vs 75 000 LYS). CONCLUSION: Optimisation-informed distribution has the potential to vastly improve the impact of HIVST. Using this approach, HIVST can play a key role in improving the long-term health impact of investment in HIVST. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8287627/ /pubmed/34275876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005598 Text en © World Health Organization 2021. Licensee BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/igo/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (CC BY NC 3.0 IGO (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/igo/) ), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL. Disclaimer: The author is a staff member of the World Health Organization. The author alone is responsible for the views expressed in this publication and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the World Health Organization. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jamieson, Lise Johnson, Leigh F Matsimela, Katleho Sande, Linda Alinafe d'Elbée, Marc Majam, Mohammed Johnson, Cheryl Chidarikire, Thato Hatzold, Karin Terris-Prestholt, Fern Nichols, Brooke Meyer-Rath, Gesine The cost effectiveness and optimal configuration of HIV self-test distribution in South Africa: a model analysis |
title | The cost effectiveness and optimal configuration of HIV self-test distribution in South Africa: a model analysis |
title_full | The cost effectiveness and optimal configuration of HIV self-test distribution in South Africa: a model analysis |
title_fullStr | The cost effectiveness and optimal configuration of HIV self-test distribution in South Africa: a model analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The cost effectiveness and optimal configuration of HIV self-test distribution in South Africa: a model analysis |
title_short | The cost effectiveness and optimal configuration of HIV self-test distribution in South Africa: a model analysis |
title_sort | cost effectiveness and optimal configuration of hiv self-test distribution in south africa: a model analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005598 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamiesonlise thecosteffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT johnsonleighf thecosteffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT matsimelakatleho thecosteffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT sandelindaalinafe thecosteffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT delbeemarc thecosteffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT majammohammed thecosteffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT johnsoncheryl thecosteffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT chidarikirethato thecosteffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT hatzoldkarin thecosteffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT terrisprestholtfern thecosteffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT nicholsbrooke thecosteffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT meyerrathgesine thecosteffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT jamiesonlise costeffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT johnsonleighf costeffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT matsimelakatleho costeffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT sandelindaalinafe costeffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT delbeemarc costeffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT majammohammed costeffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT johnsoncheryl costeffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT chidarikirethato costeffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT hatzoldkarin costeffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT terrisprestholtfern costeffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT nicholsbrooke costeffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis AT meyerrathgesine costeffectivenessandoptimalconfigurationofhivselftestdistributioninsouthafricaamodelanalysis |