Cargando…

Emergency medical dispatchers’ ability to identify large vessel occlusion stroke during emergency calls

BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke, conjugated eye deviation (CED) is an evident sign of cortical ischemia and large vessel occlusion (LVO). We aimed to determine if an emergency dispatcher can recognise LVO stroke during an emergency call by asking the caller a binary question regarding whether t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vuorinen, Pauli E. T., Ollikainen, Jyrki P. J., Ketola, Pasi A., Vuorinen, Riikka-Liisa K., Setälä, Piritta A., Hoppu, Sanna E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34281596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00914-1
_version_ 1783723953325342720
author Vuorinen, Pauli E. T.
Ollikainen, Jyrki P. J.
Ketola, Pasi A.
Vuorinen, Riikka-Liisa K.
Setälä, Piritta A.
Hoppu, Sanna E.
author_facet Vuorinen, Pauli E. T.
Ollikainen, Jyrki P. J.
Ketola, Pasi A.
Vuorinen, Riikka-Liisa K.
Setälä, Piritta A.
Hoppu, Sanna E.
author_sort Vuorinen, Pauli E. T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke, conjugated eye deviation (CED) is an evident sign of cortical ischemia and large vessel occlusion (LVO). We aimed to determine if an emergency dispatcher can recognise LVO stroke during an emergency call by asking the caller a binary question regarding whether the patient’s head or gaze is away from the side of the hemiparesis or not. Further, we investigated if the paramedics can confirm this sign at the scene. In the group of positive CED answers to the emergency dispatcher, we investigated what diagnoses these patients received at the emergency department (ED). Among all patients brought to ED and subsequently treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) we tracked the proportion of patients with a positive CED answer during the emergency call. METHODS: We collected data on all stroke dispatches in the city of Tampere, Finland, from 13 February 2019 to 31 October 2020. We then reviewed all patient records from cases where the dispatcher had marked ‘yes’ to the question regarding patient CED in the computer-aided emergency response system. We also viewed all emergency department admissions to see how many patients in total were treated with MT during the period studied. RESULTS: Out of 1913 dispatches, we found 81 cases (4%) in which the caller had verified CED during the emergency call. Twenty-four of these patients were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke. Paramedics confirmed CED in only 9 (11%) of these 81 patients. Two patients with positive CED answers during the emergency call and 19 other patients brought to the emergency department were treated with MT. CONCLUSION: A small minority of stroke dispatches include a positive answer to the CED question but paramedics rarely confirm the emergency medical dispatcher’s suspicion of CED as a sign of LVO. Few patients in need of MT can be found this way. Stroke dispatch protocol with a CED question needs intensive implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8287663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82876632021-07-19 Emergency medical dispatchers’ ability to identify large vessel occlusion stroke during emergency calls Vuorinen, Pauli E. T. Ollikainen, Jyrki P. J. Ketola, Pasi A. Vuorinen, Riikka-Liisa K. Setälä, Piritta A. Hoppu, Sanna E. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke, conjugated eye deviation (CED) is an evident sign of cortical ischemia and large vessel occlusion (LVO). We aimed to determine if an emergency dispatcher can recognise LVO stroke during an emergency call by asking the caller a binary question regarding whether the patient’s head or gaze is away from the side of the hemiparesis or not. Further, we investigated if the paramedics can confirm this sign at the scene. In the group of positive CED answers to the emergency dispatcher, we investigated what diagnoses these patients received at the emergency department (ED). Among all patients brought to ED and subsequently treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) we tracked the proportion of patients with a positive CED answer during the emergency call. METHODS: We collected data on all stroke dispatches in the city of Tampere, Finland, from 13 February 2019 to 31 October 2020. We then reviewed all patient records from cases where the dispatcher had marked ‘yes’ to the question regarding patient CED in the computer-aided emergency response system. We also viewed all emergency department admissions to see how many patients in total were treated with MT during the period studied. RESULTS: Out of 1913 dispatches, we found 81 cases (4%) in which the caller had verified CED during the emergency call. Twenty-four of these patients were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke. Paramedics confirmed CED in only 9 (11%) of these 81 patients. Two patients with positive CED answers during the emergency call and 19 other patients brought to the emergency department were treated with MT. CONCLUSION: A small minority of stroke dispatches include a positive answer to the CED question but paramedics rarely confirm the emergency medical dispatcher’s suspicion of CED as a sign of LVO. Few patients in need of MT can be found this way. Stroke dispatch protocol with a CED question needs intensive implementation. BioMed Central 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8287663/ /pubmed/34281596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00914-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research
Vuorinen, Pauli E. T.
Ollikainen, Jyrki P. J.
Ketola, Pasi A.
Vuorinen, Riikka-Liisa K.
Setälä, Piritta A.
Hoppu, Sanna E.
Emergency medical dispatchers’ ability to identify large vessel occlusion stroke during emergency calls
title Emergency medical dispatchers’ ability to identify large vessel occlusion stroke during emergency calls
title_full Emergency medical dispatchers’ ability to identify large vessel occlusion stroke during emergency calls
title_fullStr Emergency medical dispatchers’ ability to identify large vessel occlusion stroke during emergency calls
title_full_unstemmed Emergency medical dispatchers’ ability to identify large vessel occlusion stroke during emergency calls
title_short Emergency medical dispatchers’ ability to identify large vessel occlusion stroke during emergency calls
title_sort emergency medical dispatchers’ ability to identify large vessel occlusion stroke during emergency calls
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34281596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00914-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vuorinenpauliet emergencymedicaldispatchersabilitytoidentifylargevesselocclusionstrokeduringemergencycalls
AT ollikainenjyrkipj emergencymedicaldispatchersabilitytoidentifylargevesselocclusionstrokeduringemergencycalls
AT ketolapasia emergencymedicaldispatchersabilitytoidentifylargevesselocclusionstrokeduringemergencycalls
AT vuorinenriikkaliisak emergencymedicaldispatchersabilitytoidentifylargevesselocclusionstrokeduringemergencycalls
AT setalapirittaa emergencymedicaldispatchersabilitytoidentifylargevesselocclusionstrokeduringemergencycalls
AT hoppusannae emergencymedicaldispatchersabilitytoidentifylargevesselocclusionstrokeduringemergencycalls