Cargando…

Association of Soy and Exclusive Breastfeeding With Central Precocious Puberty: A Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION: While soy is suggested as a possible risk factor, exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) has a likely protective effect in precocious puberty. Our aim was to evaluate the association between both of these variables with central precocious puberty (CPP) METHODS: We performed a retrospective, cas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Felício, João Soares, de Alcântara, Angélica Leite, Janaú, Luísa Corrêa, de Moraes, Lorena Vilhena, de Oliveira, Maria Clara Neres Iunes, de Lemos, Manuela Nascimento, de Souza Neto, Norberto Jorge Kzan, Neto, João Felício Abrahão, da Silva, Wanderson Maia, de Souza, Ícaro José Araújo, Said, Nivin Mazen, de Lemos, Gabriela Nascimento, Vieira, Giovana Miranda, Khayat, André Salim, dos Santos, Ândrea Kely Campos Ribeiro, de Queiroz, Natércia Neves Marques, de Sousa, Ana Carolina Contente Braga, dos Santos, Márcia Costa, de Melo, Franciane Trindade Cunha, Piani, Pedro Paulo Freire, Felício, Karem Miléo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.667029
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: While soy is suggested as a possible risk factor, exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) has a likely protective effect in precocious puberty. Our aim was to evaluate the association between both of these variables with central precocious puberty (CPP) METHODS: We performed a retrospective, case-control study. A total of 161 girls were divided into two groups: 84 patients diagnosed with CPP composed the case group and 77 patients without the diagnosis of CPP (had gone through normal onset of puberty) were the control group. RESULTS: Our control group had a higher presence of EBF >6 months, which was an important protective factor for CPP (OR: 0.5; IC 95%: 0.3–0.9, p = 0.05) and also correlated negatively with the presence of it (r = −0.2; p < 0.05). Oppositely, the use of soy was significantly higher in the CPP group, (OR: 3.8; IC 95%: 1.5–6, p < 0.05) and positively correlating (r = 0.2; p < 0.01) with the presence of CPP. Duration of soy intake (years) correlated with bone age (r = 0.415; p < 0.05). A logistic regression was performed to evaluate the effects of EBF duration and soy on CPP. The model was significant (x² (2) = 20,715, p = <0.001) and explained 12.2% (Nagelkerke R2) of the variance, correctly classifying 62.5% of cases. EBF was associated with a reduction of likelihood of having CPP [OR = 0,187 (CI = 0.055–0,635); Wald = 7,222, p = 0.007], while soy intake increased the risk [OR = 3.505 (CI) = 1,688–7,279, Wald = 11,319, p = 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Our data found the use of soy was associated with CPP. Additionally, EBF was pointed as a protective factor. However, future prospective studies are needed to clarify this issue.