Cargando…

Transsaccadic integration operates independently in different feature dimensions

Our knowledge about objects in our environment reflects an integration of current visual input with information from preceding gaze fixations. Such a mechanism may reduce uncertainty but requires the visual system to determine which information obtained in different fixations should be combined or k...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Garry, Aagten-Murphy, David, McMaster, Jessica M. V., Bays, Paul M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34264290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.7.7
_version_ 1783724026125877248
author Kong, Garry
Aagten-Murphy, David
McMaster, Jessica M. V.
Bays, Paul M.
author_facet Kong, Garry
Aagten-Murphy, David
McMaster, Jessica M. V.
Bays, Paul M.
author_sort Kong, Garry
collection PubMed
description Our knowledge about objects in our environment reflects an integration of current visual input with information from preceding gaze fixations. Such a mechanism may reduce uncertainty but requires the visual system to determine which information obtained in different fixations should be combined or kept separate. To investigate the basis of this decision, we conducted three experiments. Participants viewed a stimulus in their peripheral vision and then made a saccade that shifted the object into the opposite hemifield. During the saccade, the object underwent changes of varying magnitude in two feature dimensions (Experiment 1, color and location; Experiments 2 and 3, color and orientation). Participants reported whether they detected any change and estimated one of the postsaccadic features. Integration of presaccadic with postsaccadic input was observed as a bias in estimates toward the presaccadic feature value. In all experiments, presaccadic bias weakened as the magnitude of the transsaccadic change in the estimated feature increased. Changes in the other feature, despite having a similar probability of detection, had no effect on integration. Results were quantitatively captured by an observer model where the decision whether to integrate information from sequential fixations is made independently for each feature and coupled to awareness of a feature change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8288057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82880572021-07-26 Transsaccadic integration operates independently in different feature dimensions Kong, Garry Aagten-Murphy, David McMaster, Jessica M. V. Bays, Paul M. J Vis Article Our knowledge about objects in our environment reflects an integration of current visual input with information from preceding gaze fixations. Such a mechanism may reduce uncertainty but requires the visual system to determine which information obtained in different fixations should be combined or kept separate. To investigate the basis of this decision, we conducted three experiments. Participants viewed a stimulus in their peripheral vision and then made a saccade that shifted the object into the opposite hemifield. During the saccade, the object underwent changes of varying magnitude in two feature dimensions (Experiment 1, color and location; Experiments 2 and 3, color and orientation). Participants reported whether they detected any change and estimated one of the postsaccadic features. Integration of presaccadic with postsaccadic input was observed as a bias in estimates toward the presaccadic feature value. In all experiments, presaccadic bias weakened as the magnitude of the transsaccadic change in the estimated feature increased. Changes in the other feature, despite having a similar probability of detection, had no effect on integration. Results were quantitatively captured by an observer model where the decision whether to integrate information from sequential fixations is made independently for each feature and coupled to awareness of a feature change. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8288057/ /pubmed/34264290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.7.7 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Kong, Garry
Aagten-Murphy, David
McMaster, Jessica M. V.
Bays, Paul M.
Transsaccadic integration operates independently in different feature dimensions
title Transsaccadic integration operates independently in different feature dimensions
title_full Transsaccadic integration operates independently in different feature dimensions
title_fullStr Transsaccadic integration operates independently in different feature dimensions
title_full_unstemmed Transsaccadic integration operates independently in different feature dimensions
title_short Transsaccadic integration operates independently in different feature dimensions
title_sort transsaccadic integration operates independently in different feature dimensions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34264290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.7.7
work_keys_str_mv AT konggarry transsaccadicintegrationoperatesindependentlyindifferentfeaturedimensions
AT aagtenmurphydavid transsaccadicintegrationoperatesindependentlyindifferentfeaturedimensions
AT mcmasterjessicamv transsaccadicintegrationoperatesindependentlyindifferentfeaturedimensions
AT bayspaulm transsaccadicintegrationoperatesindependentlyindifferentfeaturedimensions