Cargando…

Comparison of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With 120- and 140-µm Cap Thickness

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and corneal biomechanical changes between 120-µm and 140-µm cap thickness after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: This prospective study included 150 eyes (150 patients: 91 eyes in the 120-µm group, and 59 ey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jun, Ikhyun, Kang, David Sung Yong, Roberts, Cynthia J., Lee, Hun, Jean, Seung Ki, Kim, Eung Kweon, Seo, Kyoung Yul, Kim, Tae-im
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34259803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.8.15
_version_ 1783724027341176832
author Jun, Ikhyun
Kang, David Sung Yong
Roberts, Cynthia J.
Lee, Hun
Jean, Seung Ki
Kim, Eung Kweon
Seo, Kyoung Yul
Kim, Tae-im
author_facet Jun, Ikhyun
Kang, David Sung Yong
Roberts, Cynthia J.
Lee, Hun
Jean, Seung Ki
Kim, Eung Kweon
Seo, Kyoung Yul
Kim, Tae-im
author_sort Jun, Ikhyun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and corneal biomechanical changes between 120-µm and 140-µm cap thickness after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: This prospective study included 150 eyes (150 patients: 91 eyes in the 120-µm group, and 59 eyes in the 140-µm group) who underwent SMILE. Enhanced correction nomograms were applied for patients according to cap thickness. Clinical outcomes, including visual acuity, refraction, and corneal wavefront aberrations, were compared between the two groups. Corneal biomechanics were evaluated using the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: The mean uncorrected-distance visual acuity, safety and efficacy indices, and refractive predictability were comparable in the 120-µm and 140-µm groups after SMILE. The postoperative total corneal root mean square higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and spherical aberrations was 0.48 ± 0.31 and 0.26 ± 0.10 in the 120-µm group, and 0.53 ± 0.16 and 0.34 ± 0.13 in the 140-µm group, which showed significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.027, and <0.001, respectively). Although corneal stiffness decreased after SMILE in both groups, the changes in the deformation amplitude ratio were significantly higher in the 140-µm group than in the 120-µm group (P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: SMILE with 120-µm and 140-µm cap thickness provided excellent predictable outcomes according to our enhanced correction nomogram. The amount of tissue removal required to achieve the same amount of refractive correction was greater in the thicker cap group. The induction of corneal HOAs and weakening of corneal biomechanics were less pronounced in the thin-cap group, which may be associated with the thinner cap, lesser lenticule thickness, or thicker residual stromal bed. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Although SMILE with different cap thickness was effective, thicker lenticule thickness in the thick-cap group may be associated with induction of HOAs, and corneal stiffness changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8288062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82880622021-07-26 Comparison of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With 120- and 140-µm Cap Thickness Jun, Ikhyun Kang, David Sung Yong Roberts, Cynthia J. Lee, Hun Jean, Seung Ki Kim, Eung Kweon Seo, Kyoung Yul Kim, Tae-im Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and corneal biomechanical changes between 120-µm and 140-µm cap thickness after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: This prospective study included 150 eyes (150 patients: 91 eyes in the 120-µm group, and 59 eyes in the 140-µm group) who underwent SMILE. Enhanced correction nomograms were applied for patients according to cap thickness. Clinical outcomes, including visual acuity, refraction, and corneal wavefront aberrations, were compared between the two groups. Corneal biomechanics were evaluated using the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: The mean uncorrected-distance visual acuity, safety and efficacy indices, and refractive predictability were comparable in the 120-µm and 140-µm groups after SMILE. The postoperative total corneal root mean square higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and spherical aberrations was 0.48 ± 0.31 and 0.26 ± 0.10 in the 120-µm group, and 0.53 ± 0.16 and 0.34 ± 0.13 in the 140-µm group, which showed significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.027, and <0.001, respectively). Although corneal stiffness decreased after SMILE in both groups, the changes in the deformation amplitude ratio were significantly higher in the 140-µm group than in the 120-µm group (P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: SMILE with 120-µm and 140-µm cap thickness provided excellent predictable outcomes according to our enhanced correction nomogram. The amount of tissue removal required to achieve the same amount of refractive correction was greater in the thicker cap group. The induction of corneal HOAs and weakening of corneal biomechanics were less pronounced in the thin-cap group, which may be associated with the thinner cap, lesser lenticule thickness, or thicker residual stromal bed. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Although SMILE with different cap thickness was effective, thicker lenticule thickness in the thick-cap group may be associated with induction of HOAs, and corneal stiffness changes. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8288062/ /pubmed/34259803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.8.15 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Jun, Ikhyun
Kang, David Sung Yong
Roberts, Cynthia J.
Lee, Hun
Jean, Seung Ki
Kim, Eung Kweon
Seo, Kyoung Yul
Kim, Tae-im
Comparison of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With 120- and 140-µm Cap Thickness
title Comparison of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With 120- and 140-µm Cap Thickness
title_full Comparison of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With 120- and 140-µm Cap Thickness
title_fullStr Comparison of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With 120- and 140-µm Cap Thickness
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With 120- and 140-µm Cap Thickness
title_short Comparison of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With 120- and 140-µm Cap Thickness
title_sort comparison of clinical and biomechanical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction with 120- and 140-µm cap thickness
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34259803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.8.15
work_keys_str_mv AT junikhyun comparisonofclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionwith120and140μmcapthickness
AT kangdavidsungyong comparisonofclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionwith120and140μmcapthickness
AT robertscynthiaj comparisonofclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionwith120and140μmcapthickness
AT leehun comparisonofclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionwith120and140μmcapthickness
AT jeanseungki comparisonofclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionwith120and140μmcapthickness
AT kimeungkweon comparisonofclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionwith120and140μmcapthickness
AT seokyoungyul comparisonofclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionwith120and140μmcapthickness
AT kimtaeim comparisonofclinicalandbiomechanicaloutcomesofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionwith120and140μmcapthickness