Cargando…

The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age

Resting‐state neural activity plays an important role for cognitive control processes. Regarding response inhibition processes, an important facet of cognitive control, especially theta‐band activity has been the focus of research. Theoretical considerations suggest that the interrelation of resting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pscherer, Charlotte, Bluschke, Annet, Mückschel, Moritz, Beste, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33982854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25469
_version_ 1783724033715470336
author Pscherer, Charlotte
Bluschke, Annet
Mückschel, Moritz
Beste, Christian
author_facet Pscherer, Charlotte
Bluschke, Annet
Mückschel, Moritz
Beste, Christian
author_sort Pscherer, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description Resting‐state neural activity plays an important role for cognitive control processes. Regarding response inhibition processes, an important facet of cognitive control, especially theta‐band activity has been the focus of research. Theoretical considerations suggest that the interrelation of resting and task‐related theta activity is subject to maturational effects. To investigate whether the relationship between resting theta activity and task‐related theta activity during a response inhibition task changes even in young age, we tested N = 166 healthy participants between 8 and 30 years of age. We found significant correlations between resting and inhibitory control‐related theta activity as well as behavioral inhibition performance. Importantly, these correlations were moderated by age. The moderation analysis revealed that higher resting theta activity was associated with stronger inhibition‐related theta activity in individuals above the age of ~10.7 years. The EEG beamforming analysis showed that this activity is associated with superior frontal region function (BA6). The correlation between resting and superior frontal response inhibition‐related theta activity became stronger with increasing age. A similar pattern was found for response inhibition performance, albeit only evident from the age of ~19.5 years. The results suggest that with increasing age, resting theta activity becomes increasingly important for processing the alarm/surprise signals in superior frontal brain regions during inhibitory control. Possible causes for these developmental changes are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8288092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82880922021-07-21 The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age Pscherer, Charlotte Bluschke, Annet Mückschel, Moritz Beste, Christian Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Resting‐state neural activity plays an important role for cognitive control processes. Regarding response inhibition processes, an important facet of cognitive control, especially theta‐band activity has been the focus of research. Theoretical considerations suggest that the interrelation of resting and task‐related theta activity is subject to maturational effects. To investigate whether the relationship between resting theta activity and task‐related theta activity during a response inhibition task changes even in young age, we tested N = 166 healthy participants between 8 and 30 years of age. We found significant correlations between resting and inhibitory control‐related theta activity as well as behavioral inhibition performance. Importantly, these correlations were moderated by age. The moderation analysis revealed that higher resting theta activity was associated with stronger inhibition‐related theta activity in individuals above the age of ~10.7 years. The EEG beamforming analysis showed that this activity is associated with superior frontal region function (BA6). The correlation between resting and superior frontal response inhibition‐related theta activity became stronger with increasing age. A similar pattern was found for response inhibition performance, albeit only evident from the age of ~19.5 years. The results suggest that with increasing age, resting theta activity becomes increasingly important for processing the alarm/surprise signals in superior frontal brain regions during inhibitory control. Possible causes for these developmental changes are discussed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8288092/ /pubmed/33982854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25469 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Pscherer, Charlotte
Bluschke, Annet
Mückschel, Moritz
Beste, Christian
The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age
title The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age
title_full The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age
title_fullStr The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age
title_full_unstemmed The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age
title_short The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age
title_sort interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33982854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25469
work_keys_str_mv AT pscherercharlotte theinterplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage
AT bluschkeannet theinterplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage
AT muckschelmoritz theinterplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage
AT bestechristian theinterplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage
AT pscherercharlotte interplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage
AT bluschkeannet interplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage
AT muckschelmoritz interplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage
AT bestechristian interplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage