Cargando…
The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age
Resting‐state neural activity plays an important role for cognitive control processes. Regarding response inhibition processes, an important facet of cognitive control, especially theta‐band activity has been the focus of research. Theoretical considerations suggest that the interrelation of resting...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33982854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25469 |
_version_ | 1783724033715470336 |
---|---|
author | Pscherer, Charlotte Bluschke, Annet Mückschel, Moritz Beste, Christian |
author_facet | Pscherer, Charlotte Bluschke, Annet Mückschel, Moritz Beste, Christian |
author_sort | Pscherer, Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | Resting‐state neural activity plays an important role for cognitive control processes. Regarding response inhibition processes, an important facet of cognitive control, especially theta‐band activity has been the focus of research. Theoretical considerations suggest that the interrelation of resting and task‐related theta activity is subject to maturational effects. To investigate whether the relationship between resting theta activity and task‐related theta activity during a response inhibition task changes even in young age, we tested N = 166 healthy participants between 8 and 30 years of age. We found significant correlations between resting and inhibitory control‐related theta activity as well as behavioral inhibition performance. Importantly, these correlations were moderated by age. The moderation analysis revealed that higher resting theta activity was associated with stronger inhibition‐related theta activity in individuals above the age of ~10.7 years. The EEG beamforming analysis showed that this activity is associated with superior frontal region function (BA6). The correlation between resting and superior frontal response inhibition‐related theta activity became stronger with increasing age. A similar pattern was found for response inhibition performance, albeit only evident from the age of ~19.5 years. The results suggest that with increasing age, resting theta activity becomes increasingly important for processing the alarm/surprise signals in superior frontal brain regions during inhibitory control. Possible causes for these developmental changes are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8288092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82880922021-07-21 The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age Pscherer, Charlotte Bluschke, Annet Mückschel, Moritz Beste, Christian Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Resting‐state neural activity plays an important role for cognitive control processes. Regarding response inhibition processes, an important facet of cognitive control, especially theta‐band activity has been the focus of research. Theoretical considerations suggest that the interrelation of resting and task‐related theta activity is subject to maturational effects. To investigate whether the relationship between resting theta activity and task‐related theta activity during a response inhibition task changes even in young age, we tested N = 166 healthy participants between 8 and 30 years of age. We found significant correlations between resting and inhibitory control‐related theta activity as well as behavioral inhibition performance. Importantly, these correlations were moderated by age. The moderation analysis revealed that higher resting theta activity was associated with stronger inhibition‐related theta activity in individuals above the age of ~10.7 years. The EEG beamforming analysis showed that this activity is associated with superior frontal region function (BA6). The correlation between resting and superior frontal response inhibition‐related theta activity became stronger with increasing age. A similar pattern was found for response inhibition performance, albeit only evident from the age of ~19.5 years. The results suggest that with increasing age, resting theta activity becomes increasingly important for processing the alarm/surprise signals in superior frontal brain regions during inhibitory control. Possible causes for these developmental changes are discussed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8288092/ /pubmed/33982854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25469 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Pscherer, Charlotte Bluschke, Annet Mückschel, Moritz Beste, Christian The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age |
title | The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age |
title_full | The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age |
title_fullStr | The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age |
title_full_unstemmed | The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age |
title_short | The interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age |
title_sort | interplay of resting and inhibitory control‐related theta‐band activity depends on age |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33982854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25469 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pscherercharlotte theinterplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage AT bluschkeannet theinterplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage AT muckschelmoritz theinterplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage AT bestechristian theinterplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage AT pscherercharlotte interplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage AT bluschkeannet interplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage AT muckschelmoritz interplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage AT bestechristian interplayofrestingandinhibitorycontrolrelatedthetabandactivitydependsonage |