Cargando…

Feature selection framework for functional connectome fingerprinting

The ability to uniquely characterize individual subjects based on their functional connectome (FC) is a key requirement for progress toward precision psychiatry. FC fingerprinting is increasingly studied in the neuroimaging community for this purpose, where a variety of approaches have been develope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Kendrick, Wisner, Krista, Atluri, Gowtham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34076306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25379
_version_ 1783724035148873728
author Li, Kendrick
Wisner, Krista
Atluri, Gowtham
author_facet Li, Kendrick
Wisner, Krista
Atluri, Gowtham
author_sort Li, Kendrick
collection PubMed
description The ability to uniquely characterize individual subjects based on their functional connectome (FC) is a key requirement for progress toward precision psychiatry. FC fingerprinting is increasingly studied in the neuroimaging community for this purpose, where a variety of approaches have been developed for effective FC fingerprinting. Recent independent studies showed that fingerprinting accuracy suffers at large sample sizes and when coarser parcellations are used for computing the FC. Quantifying this problem and understanding the reasons these factors impact fingerprinting accuracy is crucial to develop more accurate fingerprinting methods for large sample sizes. Part of the challenge in fingerprinting is that FC captures both generic and subject‐specific information. A systematic approach for identifying subject‐specific FC information is crucial for making progress in addressing the fingerprinting problem. In this study, we addressed three gaps in our understanding of the FC fingerprinting problem. First, we studied the joint effect of sample size and parcellation granularity. Second, we explained the reason for reduced fingerprinting accuracy with increased sample size and reduced parcellation granularity. To this end, we used a clustering quality metric from the data mining community. Third, we developed a general feature selection framework for systematically identifying resting‐state functional connectivity (RSFC) elements that capture information to uniquely identify subjects. In sum, we evaluated six different approaches from this framework by quantifying both subject‐specific fingerprinting accuracy and the decrease in accuracy with an increase in sample size to identify which approach improved quality metrics the most.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8288098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82880982021-07-21 Feature selection framework for functional connectome fingerprinting Li, Kendrick Wisner, Krista Atluri, Gowtham Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles The ability to uniquely characterize individual subjects based on their functional connectome (FC) is a key requirement for progress toward precision psychiatry. FC fingerprinting is increasingly studied in the neuroimaging community for this purpose, where a variety of approaches have been developed for effective FC fingerprinting. Recent independent studies showed that fingerprinting accuracy suffers at large sample sizes and when coarser parcellations are used for computing the FC. Quantifying this problem and understanding the reasons these factors impact fingerprinting accuracy is crucial to develop more accurate fingerprinting methods for large sample sizes. Part of the challenge in fingerprinting is that FC captures both generic and subject‐specific information. A systematic approach for identifying subject‐specific FC information is crucial for making progress in addressing the fingerprinting problem. In this study, we addressed three gaps in our understanding of the FC fingerprinting problem. First, we studied the joint effect of sample size and parcellation granularity. Second, we explained the reason for reduced fingerprinting accuracy with increased sample size and reduced parcellation granularity. To this end, we used a clustering quality metric from the data mining community. Third, we developed a general feature selection framework for systematically identifying resting‐state functional connectivity (RSFC) elements that capture information to uniquely identify subjects. In sum, we evaluated six different approaches from this framework by quantifying both subject‐specific fingerprinting accuracy and the decrease in accuracy with an increase in sample size to identify which approach improved quality metrics the most. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8288098/ /pubmed/34076306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25379 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Li, Kendrick
Wisner, Krista
Atluri, Gowtham
Feature selection framework for functional connectome fingerprinting
title Feature selection framework for functional connectome fingerprinting
title_full Feature selection framework for functional connectome fingerprinting
title_fullStr Feature selection framework for functional connectome fingerprinting
title_full_unstemmed Feature selection framework for functional connectome fingerprinting
title_short Feature selection framework for functional connectome fingerprinting
title_sort feature selection framework for functional connectome fingerprinting
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34076306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25379
work_keys_str_mv AT likendrick featureselectionframeworkforfunctionalconnectomefingerprinting
AT wisnerkrista featureselectionframeworkforfunctionalconnectomefingerprinting
AT atlurigowtham featureselectionframeworkforfunctionalconnectomefingerprinting