Cargando…

Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation

OBJECTIVE: To compare results reporting and the presence of spin in COVID-19 study preprints with their finalised journal publications. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: International medical literature. PARTICIPANTS: Preprints and final journal publications of 67 interventional and observatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bero, Lisa, Lawrence, Rosa, Leslie, Louis, Chiu, Kellia, McDonald, Sally, Page, Matthew J, Grundy, Quinn, Parker, Lisa, Boughton, Stephanie, Kirkham, Jamie J, Featherstone, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34272226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051821
_version_ 1783724060775022592
author Bero, Lisa
Lawrence, Rosa
Leslie, Louis
Chiu, Kellia
McDonald, Sally
Page, Matthew J
Grundy, Quinn
Parker, Lisa
Boughton, Stephanie
Kirkham, Jamie J
Featherstone, Robin
author_facet Bero, Lisa
Lawrence, Rosa
Leslie, Louis
Chiu, Kellia
McDonald, Sally
Page, Matthew J
Grundy, Quinn
Parker, Lisa
Boughton, Stephanie
Kirkham, Jamie J
Featherstone, Robin
author_sort Bero, Lisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare results reporting and the presence of spin in COVID-19 study preprints with their finalised journal publications. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: International medical literature. PARTICIPANTS: Preprints and final journal publications of 67 interventional and observational studies of COVID-19 treatment or prevention from the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register published between 1 March 2020 and 30 October 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Study characteristics and discrepancies in (1) results reporting (number of outcomes, outcome descriptor, measure, metric, assessment time point, data reported, reported statistical significance of result, type of statistical analysis, subgroup analyses (if any), whether outcome was identified as primary or secondary) and (2) spin (reporting practices that distort the interpretation of results so they are viewed more favourably). RESULTS: Of 67 included studies, 23 (34%) had no discrepancies in results reporting between preprints and journal publications. Fifteen (22%) studies had at least one outcome that was included in the journal publication, but not the preprint; eight (12%) had at least one outcome that was reported in the preprint only. For outcomes that were reported in both preprints and journals, common discrepancies were differences in numerical values and statistical significance, additional statistical tests and subgroup analyses and longer follow-up times for outcome assessment in journal publications. At least one instance of spin occurred in both preprints and journals in 23/67 (34%) studies, the preprint only in 5 (7%), and the journal publications only in 2 (3%). Spin was removed between the preprint and journal publication in 5/67 (7%) studies; but added in 1/67 (1%) study. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 preprints and their subsequent journal publications were largely similar in reporting of study characteristics, outcomes and spin. All COVID-19 studies published as preprints and journal publications should be critically evaluated for discrepancies and spin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8288242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82882422021-07-20 Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation Bero, Lisa Lawrence, Rosa Leslie, Louis Chiu, Kellia McDonald, Sally Page, Matthew J Grundy, Quinn Parker, Lisa Boughton, Stephanie Kirkham, Jamie J Featherstone, Robin BMJ Open Medical Publishing and Peer Review OBJECTIVE: To compare results reporting and the presence of spin in COVID-19 study preprints with their finalised journal publications. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: International medical literature. PARTICIPANTS: Preprints and final journal publications of 67 interventional and observational studies of COVID-19 treatment or prevention from the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register published between 1 March 2020 and 30 October 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Study characteristics and discrepancies in (1) results reporting (number of outcomes, outcome descriptor, measure, metric, assessment time point, data reported, reported statistical significance of result, type of statistical analysis, subgroup analyses (if any), whether outcome was identified as primary or secondary) and (2) spin (reporting practices that distort the interpretation of results so they are viewed more favourably). RESULTS: Of 67 included studies, 23 (34%) had no discrepancies in results reporting between preprints and journal publications. Fifteen (22%) studies had at least one outcome that was included in the journal publication, but not the preprint; eight (12%) had at least one outcome that was reported in the preprint only. For outcomes that were reported in both preprints and journals, common discrepancies were differences in numerical values and statistical significance, additional statistical tests and subgroup analyses and longer follow-up times for outcome assessment in journal publications. At least one instance of spin occurred in both preprints and journals in 23/67 (34%) studies, the preprint only in 5 (7%), and the journal publications only in 2 (3%). Spin was removed between the preprint and journal publication in 5/67 (7%) studies; but added in 1/67 (1%) study. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 preprints and their subsequent journal publications were largely similar in reporting of study characteristics, outcomes and spin. All COVID-19 studies published as preprints and journal publications should be critically evaluated for discrepancies and spin. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8288242/ /pubmed/34272226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051821 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Bero, Lisa
Lawrence, Rosa
Leslie, Louis
Chiu, Kellia
McDonald, Sally
Page, Matthew J
Grundy, Quinn
Parker, Lisa
Boughton, Stephanie
Kirkham, Jamie J
Featherstone, Robin
Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
title Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
title_full Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
title_fullStr Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
title_full_unstemmed Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
title_short Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
title_sort cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from covid-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
topic Medical Publishing and Peer Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34272226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051821
work_keys_str_mv AT berolisa crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation
AT lawrencerosa crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation
AT leslielouis crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation
AT chiukellia crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation
AT mcdonaldsally crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation
AT pagematthewj crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation
AT grundyquinn crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation
AT parkerlisa crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation
AT boughtonstephanie crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation
AT kirkhamjamiej crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation
AT featherstonerobin crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation