Cargando…
Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
OBJECTIVE: To compare results reporting and the presence of spin in COVID-19 study preprints with their finalised journal publications. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: International medical literature. PARTICIPANTS: Preprints and final journal publications of 67 interventional and observatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34272226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051821 |
_version_ | 1783724060775022592 |
---|---|
author | Bero, Lisa Lawrence, Rosa Leslie, Louis Chiu, Kellia McDonald, Sally Page, Matthew J Grundy, Quinn Parker, Lisa Boughton, Stephanie Kirkham, Jamie J Featherstone, Robin |
author_facet | Bero, Lisa Lawrence, Rosa Leslie, Louis Chiu, Kellia McDonald, Sally Page, Matthew J Grundy, Quinn Parker, Lisa Boughton, Stephanie Kirkham, Jamie J Featherstone, Robin |
author_sort | Bero, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare results reporting and the presence of spin in COVID-19 study preprints with their finalised journal publications. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: International medical literature. PARTICIPANTS: Preprints and final journal publications of 67 interventional and observational studies of COVID-19 treatment or prevention from the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register published between 1 March 2020 and 30 October 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Study characteristics and discrepancies in (1) results reporting (number of outcomes, outcome descriptor, measure, metric, assessment time point, data reported, reported statistical significance of result, type of statistical analysis, subgroup analyses (if any), whether outcome was identified as primary or secondary) and (2) spin (reporting practices that distort the interpretation of results so they are viewed more favourably). RESULTS: Of 67 included studies, 23 (34%) had no discrepancies in results reporting between preprints and journal publications. Fifteen (22%) studies had at least one outcome that was included in the journal publication, but not the preprint; eight (12%) had at least one outcome that was reported in the preprint only. For outcomes that were reported in both preprints and journals, common discrepancies were differences in numerical values and statistical significance, additional statistical tests and subgroup analyses and longer follow-up times for outcome assessment in journal publications. At least one instance of spin occurred in both preprints and journals in 23/67 (34%) studies, the preprint only in 5 (7%), and the journal publications only in 2 (3%). Spin was removed between the preprint and journal publication in 5/67 (7%) studies; but added in 1/67 (1%) study. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 preprints and their subsequent journal publications were largely similar in reporting of study characteristics, outcomes and spin. All COVID-19 studies published as preprints and journal publications should be critically evaluated for discrepancies and spin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8288242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82882422021-07-20 Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation Bero, Lisa Lawrence, Rosa Leslie, Louis Chiu, Kellia McDonald, Sally Page, Matthew J Grundy, Quinn Parker, Lisa Boughton, Stephanie Kirkham, Jamie J Featherstone, Robin BMJ Open Medical Publishing and Peer Review OBJECTIVE: To compare results reporting and the presence of spin in COVID-19 study preprints with their finalised journal publications. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: International medical literature. PARTICIPANTS: Preprints and final journal publications of 67 interventional and observational studies of COVID-19 treatment or prevention from the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register published between 1 March 2020 and 30 October 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Study characteristics and discrepancies in (1) results reporting (number of outcomes, outcome descriptor, measure, metric, assessment time point, data reported, reported statistical significance of result, type of statistical analysis, subgroup analyses (if any), whether outcome was identified as primary or secondary) and (2) spin (reporting practices that distort the interpretation of results so they are viewed more favourably). RESULTS: Of 67 included studies, 23 (34%) had no discrepancies in results reporting between preprints and journal publications. Fifteen (22%) studies had at least one outcome that was included in the journal publication, but not the preprint; eight (12%) had at least one outcome that was reported in the preprint only. For outcomes that were reported in both preprints and journals, common discrepancies were differences in numerical values and statistical significance, additional statistical tests and subgroup analyses and longer follow-up times for outcome assessment in journal publications. At least one instance of spin occurred in both preprints and journals in 23/67 (34%) studies, the preprint only in 5 (7%), and the journal publications only in 2 (3%). Spin was removed between the preprint and journal publication in 5/67 (7%) studies; but added in 1/67 (1%) study. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 preprints and their subsequent journal publications were largely similar in reporting of study characteristics, outcomes and spin. All COVID-19 studies published as preprints and journal publications should be critically evaluated for discrepancies and spin. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8288242/ /pubmed/34272226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051821 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Medical Publishing and Peer Review Bero, Lisa Lawrence, Rosa Leslie, Louis Chiu, Kellia McDonald, Sally Page, Matthew J Grundy, Quinn Parker, Lisa Boughton, Stephanie Kirkham, Jamie J Featherstone, Robin Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation |
title | Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation |
title_full | Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation |
title_fullStr | Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation |
title_short | Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation |
title_sort | cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from covid-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation |
topic | Medical Publishing and Peer Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34272226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berolisa crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation AT lawrencerosa crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation AT leslielouis crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation AT chiukellia crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation AT mcdonaldsally crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation AT pagematthewj crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation AT grundyquinn crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation AT parkerlisa crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation AT boughtonstephanie crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation AT kirkhamjamiej crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation AT featherstonerobin crosssectionalstudyofpreprintsandfinaljournalpublicationsfromcovid19studiesdiscrepanciesinresultsreportingandspinininterpretation |