Cargando…

Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus)

BACKGROUND: For more than 50 years, antibiotics have been used to maintain animal welfare and improve efficiency. Recently, antibiotics were found in the muscle, liver, and kidney of guinea pig carcasses put up for sale and human consumption, which is a public health issue. Probiotics are supplement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carcelén, Fernando, López, Melissa, Martín, Felipe San, Ara, Miguel, Bezada, Sandra, Ruiz-García, Luis, Sandoval-Monzón, Rocío, López, Sofía, Guevara, Jorge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307079
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.6
_version_ 1783724148628914176
author Carcelén, Fernando
López, Melissa
Martín, Felipe San
Ara, Miguel
Bezada, Sandra
Ruiz-García, Luis
Sandoval-Monzón, Rocío
López, Sofía
Guevara, Jorge
author_facet Carcelén, Fernando
López, Melissa
Martín, Felipe San
Ara, Miguel
Bezada, Sandra
Ruiz-García, Luis
Sandoval-Monzón, Rocío
López, Sofía
Guevara, Jorge
author_sort Carcelén, Fernando
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For more than 50 years, antibiotics have been used to maintain animal welfare and improve efficiency. Recently, antibiotics were found in the muscle, liver, and kidney of guinea pig carcasses put up for sale and human consumption, which is a public health issue. Probiotics are supplements of live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate doses, could replace growth-promoting antibiotics. AIM: This study analyzed the effect of the administration of an oral probiotic mixture on the guinea pigs productive performance (Cavia porcellus). METHODS: Fifty male guinea pigs, weaned at 14 days of age, were distributed in a completely randomized design of five treatments with ten repetitions for each group. The treatments were CONTROL group without probiotic; PROB 1 given 1 ml of probiotic; PROB 2 with 2 ml of probiotic; PROB 3 with 3 ml of probiotic; and antibiotic growth promoter (AGP) was given 300 ppm zinc bacitracin. The microorganisms used in the probiotic were Enterococcus hirae, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus frumenti, Lactobacillus johnsoni, Streptococcus thoraltensis, and Bacillus pumilus. Productive parameters were evaluated from weaning to 70 days of age. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the treatments on forage dry matter intake (DMI), concentrateconcentrate DMI, or total concentrate DMI (p > 0.05). Similarly, no statistical difference was found between the treatments in terms of final weight or weight gain (p > 0.05). Regarding the feed conversion ratio (FCR), there was a significant difference between treatments (p = 0.045); the CONTROL group had the highest FCR, followed by the AGP group, with the best FCR observed in the PROB 3 group (p < 0.05). In addition, significant statistical differences were found between CONTROL and PROB 2 (p < 0.05). Likewise, a significant linear effect of increasing doses of the probiotic was found (p = 0.01), which indicated that the feed conversion was better with a higher dose. CONCLUSION: The treatments evaluated in this study significantly impacted the FCR in guinea pigs for fattening. Increasing doses of probiotics had a linear effect on FCR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8288744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82887442021-07-23 Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus) Carcelén, Fernando López, Melissa Martín, Felipe San Ara, Miguel Bezada, Sandra Ruiz-García, Luis Sandoval-Monzón, Rocío López, Sofía Guevara, Jorge Open Vet J Original Research BACKGROUND: For more than 50 years, antibiotics have been used to maintain animal welfare and improve efficiency. Recently, antibiotics were found in the muscle, liver, and kidney of guinea pig carcasses put up for sale and human consumption, which is a public health issue. Probiotics are supplements of live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate doses, could replace growth-promoting antibiotics. AIM: This study analyzed the effect of the administration of an oral probiotic mixture on the guinea pigs productive performance (Cavia porcellus). METHODS: Fifty male guinea pigs, weaned at 14 days of age, were distributed in a completely randomized design of five treatments with ten repetitions for each group. The treatments were CONTROL group without probiotic; PROB 1 given 1 ml of probiotic; PROB 2 with 2 ml of probiotic; PROB 3 with 3 ml of probiotic; and antibiotic growth promoter (AGP) was given 300 ppm zinc bacitracin. The microorganisms used in the probiotic were Enterococcus hirae, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus frumenti, Lactobacillus johnsoni, Streptococcus thoraltensis, and Bacillus pumilus. Productive parameters were evaluated from weaning to 70 days of age. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the treatments on forage dry matter intake (DMI), concentrateconcentrate DMI, or total concentrate DMI (p > 0.05). Similarly, no statistical difference was found between the treatments in terms of final weight or weight gain (p > 0.05). Regarding the feed conversion ratio (FCR), there was a significant difference between treatments (p = 0.045); the CONTROL group had the highest FCR, followed by the AGP group, with the best FCR observed in the PROB 3 group (p < 0.05). In addition, significant statistical differences were found between CONTROL and PROB 2 (p < 0.05). Likewise, a significant linear effect of increasing doses of the probiotic was found (p = 0.01), which indicated that the feed conversion was better with a higher dose. CONCLUSION: The treatments evaluated in this study significantly impacted the FCR in guinea pigs for fattening. Increasing doses of probiotics had a linear effect on FCR. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine 2021 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8288744/ /pubmed/34307079 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.6 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Carcelén, Fernando
López, Melissa
Martín, Felipe San
Ara, Miguel
Bezada, Sandra
Ruiz-García, Luis
Sandoval-Monzón, Rocío
López, Sofía
Guevara, Jorge
Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus)
title Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus)
title_full Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus)
title_fullStr Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus)
title_full_unstemmed Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus)
title_short Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus)
title_sort effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (cavia porcellus)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307079
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.6
work_keys_str_mv AT carcelenfernando effectofprobioticsadministrationatdifferentlevelsontheproductiveparametersofguineapigsforfatteningcaviaporcellus
AT lopezmelissa effectofprobioticsadministrationatdifferentlevelsontheproductiveparametersofguineapigsforfatteningcaviaporcellus
AT martinfelipesan effectofprobioticsadministrationatdifferentlevelsontheproductiveparametersofguineapigsforfatteningcaviaporcellus
AT aramiguel effectofprobioticsadministrationatdifferentlevelsontheproductiveparametersofguineapigsforfatteningcaviaporcellus
AT bezadasandra effectofprobioticsadministrationatdifferentlevelsontheproductiveparametersofguineapigsforfatteningcaviaporcellus
AT ruizgarcialuis effectofprobioticsadministrationatdifferentlevelsontheproductiveparametersofguineapigsforfatteningcaviaporcellus
AT sandovalmonzonrocio effectofprobioticsadministrationatdifferentlevelsontheproductiveparametersofguineapigsforfatteningcaviaporcellus
AT lopezsofia effectofprobioticsadministrationatdifferentlevelsontheproductiveparametersofguineapigsforfatteningcaviaporcellus
AT guevarajorge effectofprobioticsadministrationatdifferentlevelsontheproductiveparametersofguineapigsforfatteningcaviaporcellus