Cargando…
Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept?
The biological species concept (BSC) is the cornerstone of neo-Darwinian thinking. In BSC, species do not exchange genes either during or after speciation. However, as gene flow during speciation is increasingly being reported in a substantial literature, it seems time to reassess the revered, but o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwz220 |
_version_ | 1783724189632430080 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xinfeng He, Ziwen Shi, Suhua Wu, Chung-I |
author_facet | Wang, Xinfeng He, Ziwen Shi, Suhua Wu, Chung-I |
author_sort | Wang, Xinfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | The biological species concept (BSC) is the cornerstone of neo-Darwinian thinking. In BSC, species do not exchange genes either during or after speciation. However, as gene flow during speciation is increasingly being reported in a substantial literature, it seems time to reassess the revered, but often doubted, BSC. Contrary to the common perception, BSC should expect substantial gene flow at the onset of speciation, not least because geographical isolation develops gradually. Although BSC does not stipulate how speciation begins, it does require a sustained period of isolation for speciation to complete its course. Evidence against BSC must demonstrate that the observed gene flow does not merely occur at the onset of speciation but continues until its completion. Importantly, recent genomic analyses cannot reject this more realistic version of BSC, although future analyses may still prove it wrong. The ultimate acceptance or rejection of BSC is not merely about a historical debate; rather, it is about the fundamental nature of species – are species (and, hence, divergent adaptations) driven by a relatively small number of genes, or by thousands of them? Many levels of biology, ranging from taxonomy to biodiversity, depend on this resolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8288927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82889272021-10-21 Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept? Wang, Xinfeng He, Ziwen Shi, Suhua Wu, Chung-I Natl Sci Rev Molecular Biology & Genetics The biological species concept (BSC) is the cornerstone of neo-Darwinian thinking. In BSC, species do not exchange genes either during or after speciation. However, as gene flow during speciation is increasingly being reported in a substantial literature, it seems time to reassess the revered, but often doubted, BSC. Contrary to the common perception, BSC should expect substantial gene flow at the onset of speciation, not least because geographical isolation develops gradually. Although BSC does not stipulate how speciation begins, it does require a sustained period of isolation for speciation to complete its course. Evidence against BSC must demonstrate that the observed gene flow does not merely occur at the onset of speciation but continues until its completion. Importantly, recent genomic analyses cannot reject this more realistic version of BSC, although future analyses may still prove it wrong. The ultimate acceptance or rejection of BSC is not merely about a historical debate; rather, it is about the fundamental nature of species – are species (and, hence, divergent adaptations) driven by a relatively small number of genes, or by thousands of them? Many levels of biology, ranging from taxonomy to biodiversity, depend on this resolution. Oxford University Press 2020-08 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8288927/ /pubmed/34692166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwz220 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Molecular Biology & Genetics Wang, Xinfeng He, Ziwen Shi, Suhua Wu, Chung-I Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept? |
title | Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept? |
title_full | Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept? |
title_fullStr | Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept? |
title_full_unstemmed | Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept? |
title_short | Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept? |
title_sort | genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept? |
topic | Molecular Biology & Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwz220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxinfeng genesandspeciationisittimetoabandonthebiologicalspeciesconcept AT heziwen genesandspeciationisittimetoabandonthebiologicalspeciesconcept AT shisuhua genesandspeciationisittimetoabandonthebiologicalspeciesconcept AT wuchungi genesandspeciationisittimetoabandonthebiologicalspeciesconcept |