Cargando…

Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept?

The biological species concept (BSC) is the cornerstone of neo-Darwinian thinking. In BSC, species do not exchange genes either during or after speciation. However, as gene flow during speciation is increasingly being reported in a substantial literature, it seems time to reassess the revered, but o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xinfeng, He, Ziwen, Shi, Suhua, Wu, Chung-I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwz220
_version_ 1783724189632430080
author Wang, Xinfeng
He, Ziwen
Shi, Suhua
Wu, Chung-I
author_facet Wang, Xinfeng
He, Ziwen
Shi, Suhua
Wu, Chung-I
author_sort Wang, Xinfeng
collection PubMed
description The biological species concept (BSC) is the cornerstone of neo-Darwinian thinking. In BSC, species do not exchange genes either during or after speciation. However, as gene flow during speciation is increasingly being reported in a substantial literature, it seems time to reassess the revered, but often doubted, BSC. Contrary to the common perception, BSC should expect substantial gene flow at the onset of speciation, not least because geographical isolation develops gradually. Although BSC does not stipulate how speciation begins, it does require a sustained period of isolation for speciation to complete its course. Evidence against BSC must demonstrate that the observed gene flow does not merely occur at the onset of speciation but continues until its completion. Importantly, recent genomic analyses cannot reject this more realistic version of BSC, although future analyses may still prove it wrong. The ultimate acceptance or rejection of BSC is not merely about a historical debate; rather, it is about the fundamental nature of species – are species (and, hence, divergent adaptations) driven by a relatively small number of genes, or by thousands of them? Many levels of biology, ranging from taxonomy to biodiversity, depend on this resolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8288927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82889272021-10-21 Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept? Wang, Xinfeng He, Ziwen Shi, Suhua Wu, Chung-I Natl Sci Rev Molecular Biology & Genetics The biological species concept (BSC) is the cornerstone of neo-Darwinian thinking. In BSC, species do not exchange genes either during or after speciation. However, as gene flow during speciation is increasingly being reported in a substantial literature, it seems time to reassess the revered, but often doubted, BSC. Contrary to the common perception, BSC should expect substantial gene flow at the onset of speciation, not least because geographical isolation develops gradually. Although BSC does not stipulate how speciation begins, it does require a sustained period of isolation for speciation to complete its course. Evidence against BSC must demonstrate that the observed gene flow does not merely occur at the onset of speciation but continues until its completion. Importantly, recent genomic analyses cannot reject this more realistic version of BSC, although future analyses may still prove it wrong. The ultimate acceptance or rejection of BSC is not merely about a historical debate; rather, it is about the fundamental nature of species – are species (and, hence, divergent adaptations) driven by a relatively small number of genes, or by thousands of them? Many levels of biology, ranging from taxonomy to biodiversity, depend on this resolution. Oxford University Press 2020-08 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8288927/ /pubmed/34692166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwz220 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Molecular Biology & Genetics
Wang, Xinfeng
He, Ziwen
Shi, Suhua
Wu, Chung-I
Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept?
title Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept?
title_full Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept?
title_fullStr Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept?
title_full_unstemmed Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept?
title_short Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept?
title_sort genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept?
topic Molecular Biology & Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8288927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwz220
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxinfeng genesandspeciationisittimetoabandonthebiologicalspeciesconcept
AT heziwen genesandspeciationisittimetoabandonthebiologicalspeciesconcept
AT shisuhua genesandspeciationisittimetoabandonthebiologicalspeciesconcept
AT wuchungi genesandspeciationisittimetoabandonthebiologicalspeciesconcept