Cargando…

Comparison of Pollen Grain Treatments Without Mechanical Fracturation Prior to Protein Quantification

Protein and amino acids in pollen are important nutritional components for larval development in several insect species, especially in Apoidea. The Bradford assay is a widely used method to measure relative protein content of pollen, which can shed light on pollen quality and consequences to fitness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westreich, Lila R, Tobin, Patrick C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34280293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieab043
_version_ 1783724220950249472
author Westreich, Lila R
Tobin, Patrick C
author_facet Westreich, Lila R
Tobin, Patrick C
author_sort Westreich, Lila R
collection PubMed
description Protein and amino acids in pollen are important nutritional components for larval development in several insect species, especially in Apoidea. The Bradford assay is a widely used method to measure relative protein content of pollen, which can shed light on pollen quality and consequences to fitness. Prior to using the Bradford assay, protein must be released from pollen grains, often using a mixture of chemical and mechanical fracturation methods. In this study, we tested the efficacy of protein extraction without using mechanical fracturation. We used pollen collected by the solitary bee Osmia lignaria Say to compare two known buffers associated with pollen protein analysis: phosphate-buffered saline and sodium hydroxide, and deionized water, and with different pollen weights from which we quantified protein using the Bradford assay. While all buffers and deionized water were useful in releasing protein from pollen grains collected by O. lignaria, the use of sodium hydroxide resulted in significantly higher protein quantification across all pollen weights. This methodological study can inform future studies of pollen nutrition in pollen-foraging species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8289063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82890632021-07-20 Comparison of Pollen Grain Treatments Without Mechanical Fracturation Prior to Protein Quantification Westreich, Lila R Tobin, Patrick C J Insect Sci Protocols Protein and amino acids in pollen are important nutritional components for larval development in several insect species, especially in Apoidea. The Bradford assay is a widely used method to measure relative protein content of pollen, which can shed light on pollen quality and consequences to fitness. Prior to using the Bradford assay, protein must be released from pollen grains, often using a mixture of chemical and mechanical fracturation methods. In this study, we tested the efficacy of protein extraction without using mechanical fracturation. We used pollen collected by the solitary bee Osmia lignaria Say to compare two known buffers associated with pollen protein analysis: phosphate-buffered saline and sodium hydroxide, and deionized water, and with different pollen weights from which we quantified protein using the Bradford assay. While all buffers and deionized water were useful in releasing protein from pollen grains collected by O. lignaria, the use of sodium hydroxide resulted in significantly higher protein quantification across all pollen weights. This methodological study can inform future studies of pollen nutrition in pollen-foraging species. Oxford University Press 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8289063/ /pubmed/34280293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieab043 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Protocols
Westreich, Lila R
Tobin, Patrick C
Comparison of Pollen Grain Treatments Without Mechanical Fracturation Prior to Protein Quantification
title Comparison of Pollen Grain Treatments Without Mechanical Fracturation Prior to Protein Quantification
title_full Comparison of Pollen Grain Treatments Without Mechanical Fracturation Prior to Protein Quantification
title_fullStr Comparison of Pollen Grain Treatments Without Mechanical Fracturation Prior to Protein Quantification
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Pollen Grain Treatments Without Mechanical Fracturation Prior to Protein Quantification
title_short Comparison of Pollen Grain Treatments Without Mechanical Fracturation Prior to Protein Quantification
title_sort comparison of pollen grain treatments without mechanical fracturation prior to protein quantification
topic Protocols
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34280293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieab043
work_keys_str_mv AT westreichlilar comparisonofpollengraintreatmentswithoutmechanicalfracturationpriortoproteinquantification
AT tobinpatrickc comparisonofpollengraintreatmentswithoutmechanicalfracturationpriortoproteinquantification