Cargando…

Impact of different SARS-CoV-2 assays on laboratory turnaround time

INTRODUCTION: Clinical microbiology laboratories have had to cope with an increase in the volume of tests due to the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Short turnaround times (TATs) are important for case tracing and to help clinicians in patient management. In such a context, high-throughput system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marquis, Bastian, Opota, Onya, Jaton, Katia, Greub, Gilbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Microbiology Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33956591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001280
_version_ 1783724251987050496
author Marquis, Bastian
Opota, Onya
Jaton, Katia
Greub, Gilbert
author_facet Marquis, Bastian
Opota, Onya
Jaton, Katia
Greub, Gilbert
author_sort Marquis, Bastian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clinical microbiology laboratories have had to cope with an increase in the volume of tests due to the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Short turnaround times (TATs) are important for case tracing and to help clinicians in patient management. In such a context, high-throughput systems are essential to process the bulk of the tests. Rapid tests are also required to ensure shorter TATs for urgent situations. In our laboratory, SARS-CoV-2 assays were initially implemented on our custom platform using a previously published method. The commercial cobas 6800 (Roche diagnostics) assay and the GeneXpert Xpress (Cepheid) SARS-CoV-2 assay were implemented on 24 March and 8 April 2020, respectively, as soon as available. HYPOTHESIS/GAP STATEMENT: Despite the abundant literature on SARS-CoV-2 assays, the articles focus mainly on the diagnostic performances. This is to our knowledge the first article that specifically studies the TAT of different assays. AIM: We aimed to describe the impact of various SARS-CoV-2 assays on the TAT at the beginning of the outbreak. METHODOLOGY: In this study, we retrospectively analysed the TAT of all SARS-CoV-2 assays performed in our centre between 24 February and 9 June, 2020. RESULTS: We retrieved 33 900 analyses, with a median TAT of 6.25 h. TATs were highest (6.9 h) when only our custom platform was used (24 February to 24 March, 2020). They were reduced to 6.1 h when the cobas system was introduced (24 March to 8 April, 2020). The implementation of the GeneXpert further reduced the median TAT to 4.8 h (8 April to 9 June, 2020). The GeneXpert system had the shortest median TAT (1.9 h), followed by the cobas (5.5 h) and by our custom platform (6.9 h). CONCLUSION: This work shows that the combination of high-throughput systems and rapid tests allows the efficient processing of a large number of tests with a short TAT. In addition, the use of a custom platform allowed the quick implementation of an in-house test when commercial assays were not yet available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8289200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Microbiology Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82892002021-07-21 Impact of different SARS-CoV-2 assays on laboratory turnaround time Marquis, Bastian Opota, Onya Jaton, Katia Greub, Gilbert J Med Microbiol Disease, Diagnosis and Diagnostics INTRODUCTION: Clinical microbiology laboratories have had to cope with an increase in the volume of tests due to the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Short turnaround times (TATs) are important for case tracing and to help clinicians in patient management. In such a context, high-throughput systems are essential to process the bulk of the tests. Rapid tests are also required to ensure shorter TATs for urgent situations. In our laboratory, SARS-CoV-2 assays were initially implemented on our custom platform using a previously published method. The commercial cobas 6800 (Roche diagnostics) assay and the GeneXpert Xpress (Cepheid) SARS-CoV-2 assay were implemented on 24 March and 8 April 2020, respectively, as soon as available. HYPOTHESIS/GAP STATEMENT: Despite the abundant literature on SARS-CoV-2 assays, the articles focus mainly on the diagnostic performances. This is to our knowledge the first article that specifically studies the TAT of different assays. AIM: We aimed to describe the impact of various SARS-CoV-2 assays on the TAT at the beginning of the outbreak. METHODOLOGY: In this study, we retrospectively analysed the TAT of all SARS-CoV-2 assays performed in our centre between 24 February and 9 June, 2020. RESULTS: We retrieved 33 900 analyses, with a median TAT of 6.25 h. TATs were highest (6.9 h) when only our custom platform was used (24 February to 24 March, 2020). They were reduced to 6.1 h when the cobas system was introduced (24 March to 8 April, 2020). The implementation of the GeneXpert further reduced the median TAT to 4.8 h (8 April to 9 June, 2020). The GeneXpert system had the shortest median TAT (1.9 h), followed by the cobas (5.5 h) and by our custom platform (6.9 h). CONCLUSION: This work shows that the combination of high-throughput systems and rapid tests allows the efficient processing of a large number of tests with a short TAT. In addition, the use of a custom platform allowed the quick implementation of an in-house test when commercial assays were not yet available. Microbiology Society 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8289200/ /pubmed/33956591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001280 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The Microbiology Society waived the open access fees for this article.
spellingShingle Disease, Diagnosis and Diagnostics
Marquis, Bastian
Opota, Onya
Jaton, Katia
Greub, Gilbert
Impact of different SARS-CoV-2 assays on laboratory turnaround time
title Impact of different SARS-CoV-2 assays on laboratory turnaround time
title_full Impact of different SARS-CoV-2 assays on laboratory turnaround time
title_fullStr Impact of different SARS-CoV-2 assays on laboratory turnaround time
title_full_unstemmed Impact of different SARS-CoV-2 assays on laboratory turnaround time
title_short Impact of different SARS-CoV-2 assays on laboratory turnaround time
title_sort impact of different sars-cov-2 assays on laboratory turnaround time
topic Disease, Diagnosis and Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33956591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001280
work_keys_str_mv AT marquisbastian impactofdifferentsarscov2assaysonlaboratoryturnaroundtime
AT opotaonya impactofdifferentsarscov2assaysonlaboratoryturnaroundtime
AT jatonkatia impactofdifferentsarscov2assaysonlaboratoryturnaroundtime
AT greubgilbert impactofdifferentsarscov2assaysonlaboratoryturnaroundtime