Cargando…
The Validation of Clinical Examination and MRI as a Diagnostic Tool for Cruciate Ligaments and Meniscus Injuries of the Knee Against Diagnostic Arthroscopy
Background: This study was conducted to compare the accuracy of MRI findings and clinical examination of ligamentous and meniscal injuries of the knee, taking arthroscopy as a standard diagnostic tool in knee injuries. Methods: All patients with knee injuries attending the outpatient department or...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290922 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15727 |
_version_ | 1783724292376100864 |
---|---|
author | Shantanu, Kumar Singh, Shailendra Srivastava, Shubham Saroj, Atul K |
author_facet | Shantanu, Kumar Singh, Shailendra Srivastava, Shubham Saroj, Atul K |
author_sort | Shantanu, Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: This study was conducted to compare the accuracy of MRI findings and clinical examination of ligamentous and meniscal injuries of the knee, taking arthroscopy as a standard diagnostic tool in knee injuries. Methods: All patients with knee injuries attending the outpatient department or emergency of our hospital underwent clinical examination. Out of them, 60 patients with knee injuries were subjected to clinical examination, MRI, and then arthroscopy. The findings of these diagnostic tools in respect to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and meniscus injuries were validated, compared, and analyzed using various statistical tools. The accuracy, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and specificity were calculated and an agreement between various tests was established using kappa statistics. Results: The accuracy of clinical examination in our study was 88% for ACL tears, 85% for meniscal tears, and 100% for PCL tears. The kappa measure of agreement between arthroscopy and clinical finding and MRI for ACL was 0.610 and 0.698, respectively, which was statistically significant. MRI (98.1) was found to be a more sensitive test for detecting ACL injury than clinical examination (90.4%) resulting in higher diagnostic accuracy (98.3%), while diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination and MRI was found to be 100% for PCL injuries. Hence, MRI is an excellent screening tool for ligamentous and meniscal injuries of the knee joint. We can avoid diagnostic arthroscopy in patients with knee injuries having equivocal clinical and MRI examinations and can proceed for therapeutic arthroscopy to deal with such injuries. Conclusions: For the assessment of ligamentous and meniscal injuries, MRI is an accurate and noninvasive modality. It can be used as a first-line investigation but arthroscopy remains the gold standard. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8289396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82893962021-07-20 The Validation of Clinical Examination and MRI as a Diagnostic Tool for Cruciate Ligaments and Meniscus Injuries of the Knee Against Diagnostic Arthroscopy Shantanu, Kumar Singh, Shailendra Srivastava, Shubham Saroj, Atul K Cureus Radiology Background: This study was conducted to compare the accuracy of MRI findings and clinical examination of ligamentous and meniscal injuries of the knee, taking arthroscopy as a standard diagnostic tool in knee injuries. Methods: All patients with knee injuries attending the outpatient department or emergency of our hospital underwent clinical examination. Out of them, 60 patients with knee injuries were subjected to clinical examination, MRI, and then arthroscopy. The findings of these diagnostic tools in respect to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and meniscus injuries were validated, compared, and analyzed using various statistical tools. The accuracy, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and specificity were calculated and an agreement between various tests was established using kappa statistics. Results: The accuracy of clinical examination in our study was 88% for ACL tears, 85% for meniscal tears, and 100% for PCL tears. The kappa measure of agreement between arthroscopy and clinical finding and MRI for ACL was 0.610 and 0.698, respectively, which was statistically significant. MRI (98.1) was found to be a more sensitive test for detecting ACL injury than clinical examination (90.4%) resulting in higher diagnostic accuracy (98.3%), while diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination and MRI was found to be 100% for PCL injuries. Hence, MRI is an excellent screening tool for ligamentous and meniscal injuries of the knee joint. We can avoid diagnostic arthroscopy in patients with knee injuries having equivocal clinical and MRI examinations and can proceed for therapeutic arthroscopy to deal with such injuries. Conclusions: For the assessment of ligamentous and meniscal injuries, MRI is an accurate and noninvasive modality. It can be used as a first-line investigation but arthroscopy remains the gold standard. Cureus 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8289396/ /pubmed/34290922 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15727 Text en Copyright © 2021, Shantanu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Radiology Shantanu, Kumar Singh, Shailendra Srivastava, Shubham Saroj, Atul K The Validation of Clinical Examination and MRI as a Diagnostic Tool for Cruciate Ligaments and Meniscus Injuries of the Knee Against Diagnostic Arthroscopy |
title | The Validation of Clinical Examination and MRI as a Diagnostic Tool for Cruciate Ligaments and Meniscus Injuries of the Knee Against Diagnostic Arthroscopy |
title_full | The Validation of Clinical Examination and MRI as a Diagnostic Tool for Cruciate Ligaments and Meniscus Injuries of the Knee Against Diagnostic Arthroscopy |
title_fullStr | The Validation of Clinical Examination and MRI as a Diagnostic Tool for Cruciate Ligaments and Meniscus Injuries of the Knee Against Diagnostic Arthroscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | The Validation of Clinical Examination and MRI as a Diagnostic Tool for Cruciate Ligaments and Meniscus Injuries of the Knee Against Diagnostic Arthroscopy |
title_short | The Validation of Clinical Examination and MRI as a Diagnostic Tool for Cruciate Ligaments and Meniscus Injuries of the Knee Against Diagnostic Arthroscopy |
title_sort | validation of clinical examination and mri as a diagnostic tool for cruciate ligaments and meniscus injuries of the knee against diagnostic arthroscopy |
topic | Radiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290922 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15727 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shantanukumar thevalidationofclinicalexaminationandmriasadiagnostictoolforcruciateligamentsandmeniscusinjuriesofthekneeagainstdiagnosticarthroscopy AT singhshailendra thevalidationofclinicalexaminationandmriasadiagnostictoolforcruciateligamentsandmeniscusinjuriesofthekneeagainstdiagnosticarthroscopy AT srivastavashubham thevalidationofclinicalexaminationandmriasadiagnostictoolforcruciateligamentsandmeniscusinjuriesofthekneeagainstdiagnosticarthroscopy AT sarojatulk thevalidationofclinicalexaminationandmriasadiagnostictoolforcruciateligamentsandmeniscusinjuriesofthekneeagainstdiagnosticarthroscopy AT shantanukumar validationofclinicalexaminationandmriasadiagnostictoolforcruciateligamentsandmeniscusinjuriesofthekneeagainstdiagnosticarthroscopy AT singhshailendra validationofclinicalexaminationandmriasadiagnostictoolforcruciateligamentsandmeniscusinjuriesofthekneeagainstdiagnosticarthroscopy AT srivastavashubham validationofclinicalexaminationandmriasadiagnostictoolforcruciateligamentsandmeniscusinjuriesofthekneeagainstdiagnosticarthroscopy AT sarojatulk validationofclinicalexaminationandmriasadiagnostictoolforcruciateligamentsandmeniscusinjuriesofthekneeagainstdiagnosticarthroscopy |