Cargando…

Validation of Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement in Subaxial Spine Using the “Burcev Technique”: A Cadaveric Study

The present study attempted to validate the “Burcev freehand method” based on anatomical observations in Indian cadavers. The study was conducted on 32 cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) that were placed in four cadavers by the authors according to the “freehand technique,” described by Burcev et al, wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Mantu, Sahu, Rabi N., Gaikwad, Manisha R., Panda, Sashikanta, Tirpude, Amit, Bag, Nerbadyswari D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1727410
_version_ 1783724313668485120
author Jain, Mantu
Sahu, Rabi N.
Gaikwad, Manisha R.
Panda, Sashikanta
Tirpude, Amit
Bag, Nerbadyswari D.
author_facet Jain, Mantu
Sahu, Rabi N.
Gaikwad, Manisha R.
Panda, Sashikanta
Tirpude, Amit
Bag, Nerbadyswari D.
author_sort Jain, Mantu
collection PubMed
description The present study attempted to validate the “Burcev freehand method” based on anatomical observations in Indian cadavers. The study was conducted on 32 cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) that were placed in four cadavers by the authors according to the “freehand technique,” described by Burcev et al, without the aid of fluoroscopy and the trajectory verified by computed tomography scans. The screws were designated as satisfactory, permissible, or unacceptable. Descriptive variables were represented in number and percentages, continuous variables were represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Of the 32 CPSs placed, 24 (75%) exhibited a satisfactory position, 1 (3%) exhibited a permissible position, and 7 (22%) exhibited an unacceptable position. Of the seven CPSs in the unacceptable group, four exhibited a lateral breach and three exhibited a medial breach, whereas the CPS in the permissible group exhibited a medial breach. The overall angle with contralateral lamina in the horizontal plane in terms of mean ± SD was 175.43 ± 2.82, 169.49, and 169.65 ± 6.46 degrees in the satisfactory, permissible, and unacceptable groups, respectively. In the sagittal plane, the screws exhibited an angle of 88.15 ± 3.56 degrees. No breach was observed superiorly or inferiorly. The “Burcev technique” is replicable with similar results in cadavers. Further studies must be conducted in a clinical setting to ensure its safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8289562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82895622021-07-21 Validation of Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement in Subaxial Spine Using the “Burcev Technique”: A Cadaveric Study Jain, Mantu Sahu, Rabi N. Gaikwad, Manisha R. Panda, Sashikanta Tirpude, Amit Bag, Nerbadyswari D. J Neurosci Rural Pract The present study attempted to validate the “Burcev freehand method” based on anatomical observations in Indian cadavers. The study was conducted on 32 cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) that were placed in four cadavers by the authors according to the “freehand technique,” described by Burcev et al, without the aid of fluoroscopy and the trajectory verified by computed tomography scans. The screws were designated as satisfactory, permissible, or unacceptable. Descriptive variables were represented in number and percentages, continuous variables were represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Of the 32 CPSs placed, 24 (75%) exhibited a satisfactory position, 1 (3%) exhibited a permissible position, and 7 (22%) exhibited an unacceptable position. Of the seven CPSs in the unacceptable group, four exhibited a lateral breach and three exhibited a medial breach, whereas the CPS in the permissible group exhibited a medial breach. The overall angle with contralateral lamina in the horizontal plane in terms of mean ± SD was 175.43 ± 2.82, 169.49, and 169.65 ± 6.46 degrees in the satisfactory, permissible, and unacceptable groups, respectively. In the sagittal plane, the screws exhibited an angle of 88.15 ± 3.56 degrees. No breach was observed superiorly or inferiorly. The “Burcev technique” is replicable with similar results in cadavers. Further studies must be conducted in a clinical setting to ensure its safety. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021-07 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8289562/ /pubmed/34295111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1727410 Text en Association for Helping Neurosurgical Sick People. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Jain, Mantu
Sahu, Rabi N.
Gaikwad, Manisha R.
Panda, Sashikanta
Tirpude, Amit
Bag, Nerbadyswari D.
Validation of Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement in Subaxial Spine Using the “Burcev Technique”: A Cadaveric Study
title Validation of Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement in Subaxial Spine Using the “Burcev Technique”: A Cadaveric Study
title_full Validation of Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement in Subaxial Spine Using the “Burcev Technique”: A Cadaveric Study
title_fullStr Validation of Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement in Subaxial Spine Using the “Burcev Technique”: A Cadaveric Study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement in Subaxial Spine Using the “Burcev Technique”: A Cadaveric Study
title_short Validation of Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement in Subaxial Spine Using the “Burcev Technique”: A Cadaveric Study
title_sort validation of freehand cervical pedicle screw placement in subaxial spine using the “burcev technique”: a cadaveric study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1727410
work_keys_str_mv AT jainmantu validationoffreehandcervicalpediclescrewplacementinsubaxialspineusingtheburcevtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT sahurabin validationoffreehandcervicalpediclescrewplacementinsubaxialspineusingtheburcevtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT gaikwadmanishar validationoffreehandcervicalpediclescrewplacementinsubaxialspineusingtheburcevtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT pandasashikanta validationoffreehandcervicalpediclescrewplacementinsubaxialspineusingtheburcevtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT tirpudeamit validationoffreehandcervicalpediclescrewplacementinsubaxialspineusingtheburcevtechniqueacadavericstudy
AT bagnerbadyswarid validationoffreehandcervicalpediclescrewplacementinsubaxialspineusingtheburcevtechniqueacadavericstudy