Cargando…

Ease of lumbar epidural catheter insertion with prepuncture ultrasound as guidance compared with conventional palpatory technique when performed by anesthesiology residents: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lumbar epidural catheter insertion is conventionally performed by anesthesia residents by palpation of anatomical landmarks with relatively blind localization of epidural space which may lead to an increase in failure rate. We aim to compare the ease of lumbar epidural catheteri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jagadish, Anguraj, Swaminathan, Srinivasan, Bidkar, Prasanna U., Gupta, Suman L., Adinarayanan, Sethuramachandran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349369
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_394_19
_version_ 1783724335939190784
author Jagadish, Anguraj
Swaminathan, Srinivasan
Bidkar, Prasanna U.
Gupta, Suman L.
Adinarayanan, Sethuramachandran
author_facet Jagadish, Anguraj
Swaminathan, Srinivasan
Bidkar, Prasanna U.
Gupta, Suman L.
Adinarayanan, Sethuramachandran
author_sort Jagadish, Anguraj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lumbar epidural catheter insertion is conventionally performed by anesthesia residents by palpation of anatomical landmarks with relatively blind localization of epidural space which may lead to an increase in failure rate. We aim to compare the ease of lumbar epidural catheterization using prepuncture ultrasound as guidance with that of conventional palpatory technique. Comparisons were made with reference to number of insertion attempts, total time taken for the procedure, frequency of dural puncture, and overall satisfaction score as assessed by Likert's scale. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty, ASA 1-3, patients undergoing elective surgeries requiring lumbar epidural catheterization were recruited for the study. Study participants were randomized into two groups. In group P, epidural catheterization was performed using the conventional palpatory method and in group U, it was performed with the help of ultrasound determined parameters. Number of insertion attempts, total time taken for successful insertion of epidural catheter, frequency of dural puncture, and overall satisfaction of ease of insertion as determined by Likert's scale were compared between both the groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 17 and P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The number of insertion attempts was significantly lesser in Group U (P = 0.019). The total procedure time was significantly higher in group U (P < .001). There was no significant difference in ease of insertion score, as measured by Likert's scale between both the groups (P = 0.45). CONCLUSION: Prepuncture ultrasound guidance improves the first attempt success rate of lumbar epidural catheterization with reduced incidence of dural puncture with similar overall satisfaction score but increases the total time taken for the procedure when compared to conventional palpatory technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8289656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82896562021-08-03 Ease of lumbar epidural catheter insertion with prepuncture ultrasound as guidance compared with conventional palpatory technique when performed by anesthesiology residents: A randomized controlled trial Jagadish, Anguraj Swaminathan, Srinivasan Bidkar, Prasanna U. Gupta, Suman L. Adinarayanan, Sethuramachandran J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lumbar epidural catheter insertion is conventionally performed by anesthesia residents by palpation of anatomical landmarks with relatively blind localization of epidural space which may lead to an increase in failure rate. We aim to compare the ease of lumbar epidural catheterization using prepuncture ultrasound as guidance with that of conventional palpatory technique. Comparisons were made with reference to number of insertion attempts, total time taken for the procedure, frequency of dural puncture, and overall satisfaction score as assessed by Likert's scale. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty, ASA 1-3, patients undergoing elective surgeries requiring lumbar epidural catheterization were recruited for the study. Study participants were randomized into two groups. In group P, epidural catheterization was performed using the conventional palpatory method and in group U, it was performed with the help of ultrasound determined parameters. Number of insertion attempts, total time taken for successful insertion of epidural catheter, frequency of dural puncture, and overall satisfaction of ease of insertion as determined by Likert's scale were compared between both the groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 17 and P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The number of insertion attempts was significantly lesser in Group U (P = 0.019). The total procedure time was significantly higher in group U (P < .001). There was no significant difference in ease of insertion score, as measured by Likert's scale between both the groups (P = 0.45). CONCLUSION: Prepuncture ultrasound guidance improves the first attempt success rate of lumbar epidural catheterization with reduced incidence of dural puncture with similar overall satisfaction score but increases the total time taken for the procedure when compared to conventional palpatory technique. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8289656/ /pubmed/34349369 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_394_19 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jagadish, Anguraj
Swaminathan, Srinivasan
Bidkar, Prasanna U.
Gupta, Suman L.
Adinarayanan, Sethuramachandran
Ease of lumbar epidural catheter insertion with prepuncture ultrasound as guidance compared with conventional palpatory technique when performed by anesthesiology residents: A randomized controlled trial
title Ease of lumbar epidural catheter insertion with prepuncture ultrasound as guidance compared with conventional palpatory technique when performed by anesthesiology residents: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Ease of lumbar epidural catheter insertion with prepuncture ultrasound as guidance compared with conventional palpatory technique when performed by anesthesiology residents: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Ease of lumbar epidural catheter insertion with prepuncture ultrasound as guidance compared with conventional palpatory technique when performed by anesthesiology residents: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Ease of lumbar epidural catheter insertion with prepuncture ultrasound as guidance compared with conventional palpatory technique when performed by anesthesiology residents: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Ease of lumbar epidural catheter insertion with prepuncture ultrasound as guidance compared with conventional palpatory technique when performed by anesthesiology residents: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort ease of lumbar epidural catheter insertion with prepuncture ultrasound as guidance compared with conventional palpatory technique when performed by anesthesiology residents: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349369
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_394_19
work_keys_str_mv AT jagadishanguraj easeoflumbarepiduralcatheterinsertionwithprepunctureultrasoundasguidancecomparedwithconventionalpalpatorytechniquewhenperformedbyanesthesiologyresidentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT swaminathansrinivasan easeoflumbarepiduralcatheterinsertionwithprepunctureultrasoundasguidancecomparedwithconventionalpalpatorytechniquewhenperformedbyanesthesiologyresidentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bidkarprasannau easeoflumbarepiduralcatheterinsertionwithprepunctureultrasoundasguidancecomparedwithconventionalpalpatorytechniquewhenperformedbyanesthesiologyresidentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guptasumanl easeoflumbarepiduralcatheterinsertionwithprepunctureultrasoundasguidancecomparedwithconventionalpalpatorytechniquewhenperformedbyanesthesiologyresidentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT adinarayanansethuramachandran easeoflumbarepiduralcatheterinsertionwithprepunctureultrasoundasguidancecomparedwithconventionalpalpatorytechniquewhenperformedbyanesthesiologyresidentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial