Cargando…

Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry

Recently, there has been clinical interest in the effect of different body positions on esophageal motility. This study aimed to identify the effect of three different body positions on esophageal motility using high-resolution manometry. Thirteen healthy adults swallowed 5 mL of water in the uprigh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aoyama, Kei, Kunieda, Kenjiro, Shigematsu, Takashi, Ohno, Tomohisa, Fujishima, Ichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32749546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10169-0
_version_ 1783724359795343360
author Aoyama, Kei
Kunieda, Kenjiro
Shigematsu, Takashi
Ohno, Tomohisa
Fujishima, Ichiro
author_facet Aoyama, Kei
Kunieda, Kenjiro
Shigematsu, Takashi
Ohno, Tomohisa
Fujishima, Ichiro
author_sort Aoyama, Kei
collection PubMed
description Recently, there has been clinical interest in the effect of different body positions on esophageal motility. This study aimed to identify the effect of three different body positions on esophageal motility using high-resolution manometry. Thirteen healthy adults swallowed 5 mL of water in the upright, supine, and bridge positions. For the bridge position, each subject raised their waist against gravity, placed a cushion under their back, and bent their knees. The proximal contractile integral (PCI) and distal contractile integral (DCI), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal latency (DL), peristaltic breaks (PBs), intrabolus pressure (IBP), and expiratory and inspiratory esophagoesophageal junction (EGJ) pressure were measured. In the bridge position, PCI, DCI, IRP, and expiratory and inspiratory EGJ pressure were significantly higher than those in the upright position (bridge PCI vs. upright PCI [p = 0.001], bridge DCI vs. upright DCI [p < 0.001], bridge IRP vs. upright IRP [p = 0.018], bridge EGJ pressure vs. upright EGJ pressure [expiratory: p = 0.001] [inspiratory: p < 0.001]). PBs were significantly shorter and DL was significantly longer in the bridge position compared to upright (bridge PBs vs. upright PBs [p = 0.001], bridge DL vs. upright DL [p = 0.001]). IBP was significantly higher in the bridge position compared to supine (bridge IBP vs. supine IBP [p = 0.01]). These results demonstrated changes in esophageal motility according to changes in position while swallowing, where esophageal contractions became stronger against gravity. Further study is required to examine the effectiveness of swallowing in the bridge position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8289772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82897722021-08-05 Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry Aoyama, Kei Kunieda, Kenjiro Shigematsu, Takashi Ohno, Tomohisa Fujishima, Ichiro Dysphagia Original Article Recently, there has been clinical interest in the effect of different body positions on esophageal motility. This study aimed to identify the effect of three different body positions on esophageal motility using high-resolution manometry. Thirteen healthy adults swallowed 5 mL of water in the upright, supine, and bridge positions. For the bridge position, each subject raised their waist against gravity, placed a cushion under their back, and bent their knees. The proximal contractile integral (PCI) and distal contractile integral (DCI), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal latency (DL), peristaltic breaks (PBs), intrabolus pressure (IBP), and expiratory and inspiratory esophagoesophageal junction (EGJ) pressure were measured. In the bridge position, PCI, DCI, IRP, and expiratory and inspiratory EGJ pressure were significantly higher than those in the upright position (bridge PCI vs. upright PCI [p = 0.001], bridge DCI vs. upright DCI [p < 0.001], bridge IRP vs. upright IRP [p = 0.018], bridge EGJ pressure vs. upright EGJ pressure [expiratory: p = 0.001] [inspiratory: p < 0.001]). PBs were significantly shorter and DL was significantly longer in the bridge position compared to upright (bridge PBs vs. upright PBs [p = 0.001], bridge DL vs. upright DL [p = 0.001]). IBP was significantly higher in the bridge position compared to supine (bridge IBP vs. supine IBP [p = 0.01]). These results demonstrated changes in esophageal motility according to changes in position while swallowing, where esophageal contractions became stronger against gravity. Further study is required to examine the effectiveness of swallowing in the bridge position. Springer US 2020-08-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8289772/ /pubmed/32749546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10169-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Aoyama, Kei
Kunieda, Kenjiro
Shigematsu, Takashi
Ohno, Tomohisa
Fujishima, Ichiro
Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry
title Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry
title_full Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry
title_fullStr Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry
title_short Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry
title_sort effect of bridge position swallow on esophageal motility in healthy individuals using high-resolution manometry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32749546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10169-0
work_keys_str_mv AT aoyamakei effectofbridgepositionswallowonesophagealmotilityinhealthyindividualsusinghighresolutionmanometry
AT kuniedakenjiro effectofbridgepositionswallowonesophagealmotilityinhealthyindividualsusinghighresolutionmanometry
AT shigematsutakashi effectofbridgepositionswallowonesophagealmotilityinhealthyindividualsusinghighresolutionmanometry
AT ohnotomohisa effectofbridgepositionswallowonesophagealmotilityinhealthyindividualsusinghighresolutionmanometry
AT fujishimaichiro effectofbridgepositionswallowonesophagealmotilityinhealthyindividualsusinghighresolutionmanometry