Cargando…

Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance

Animal feeding has a major contribution to the environmental impacts of pig production. One potential way to mitigate such effects is to incorporate an assessment of these impacts in the feed formulation process. The objective of this study was to test the ability of innovative formulation methodolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Quelen, Francine, Brossard, Ludovic, Wilfart, Aurélie, Dourmad, Jean-Yves, Garcia-Launay, Florence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295934
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.689012
_version_ 1783724391413055488
author de Quelen, Francine
Brossard, Ludovic
Wilfart, Aurélie
Dourmad, Jean-Yves
Garcia-Launay, Florence
author_facet de Quelen, Francine
Brossard, Ludovic
Wilfart, Aurélie
Dourmad, Jean-Yves
Garcia-Launay, Florence
author_sort de Quelen, Francine
collection PubMed
description Animal feeding has a major contribution to the environmental impacts of pig production. One potential way to mitigate such effects is to incorporate an assessment of these impacts in the feed formulation process. The objective of this study was to test the ability of innovative formulation methodologies to reduce the impacts of pig production while also taking into account possible effects on growth performance. We compared three different formulation methodologies: least-cost formulation, in accordance with standard practices on commercial farms; multiobjective (MO) formulation, which considered feed cost and environmental impacts as calculated by life cycle assessment (LCA); and MO formulation, which prioritized locally produced feed ingredients to reduce the impact of transport. Ninety-six pigs were distributed between three experimental groups, with pigs individually weighted and fed using an automatic feeding system from 40 to 115 kg body weight. Based on the experimental results, six categories of impacts were evaluated: climate change (CC), demand in non-renewable energy (NRE), acidification (AC), eutrophication (EU), land occupation (LO), and phosphorus demand (PD), at both feed plant gate and farm gate, with 1 kg of feed and 1 kg of live pig as functional units, respectively. At feed level, MO formulations reduced CC, NRE, AC, and PD impacts but sometimes increased LO and EU impacts. These formulations reduced the proportion of cereals and oil meals into feeds (feed ingredients with high impacts), while the proportion of alternative protein sources, like peas, faba beans, or high-protein agricultural coproducts increased (feed ingredients with low impacts). Overall, animal performance was not affected by the dietary treatment; because of this, the general pattern of results obtained with either MO formulation at farm gate was similar to that obtained at feed level. Thus, MO diet formulation represents an efficient way to reduce the environmental impacts of pig production without compromising animal performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8289902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82899022021-07-21 Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance de Quelen, Francine Brossard, Ludovic Wilfart, Aurélie Dourmad, Jean-Yves Garcia-Launay, Florence Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Animal feeding has a major contribution to the environmental impacts of pig production. One potential way to mitigate such effects is to incorporate an assessment of these impacts in the feed formulation process. The objective of this study was to test the ability of innovative formulation methodologies to reduce the impacts of pig production while also taking into account possible effects on growth performance. We compared three different formulation methodologies: least-cost formulation, in accordance with standard practices on commercial farms; multiobjective (MO) formulation, which considered feed cost and environmental impacts as calculated by life cycle assessment (LCA); and MO formulation, which prioritized locally produced feed ingredients to reduce the impact of transport. Ninety-six pigs were distributed between three experimental groups, with pigs individually weighted and fed using an automatic feeding system from 40 to 115 kg body weight. Based on the experimental results, six categories of impacts were evaluated: climate change (CC), demand in non-renewable energy (NRE), acidification (AC), eutrophication (EU), land occupation (LO), and phosphorus demand (PD), at both feed plant gate and farm gate, with 1 kg of feed and 1 kg of live pig as functional units, respectively. At feed level, MO formulations reduced CC, NRE, AC, and PD impacts but sometimes increased LO and EU impacts. These formulations reduced the proportion of cereals and oil meals into feeds (feed ingredients with high impacts), while the proportion of alternative protein sources, like peas, faba beans, or high-protein agricultural coproducts increased (feed ingredients with low impacts). Overall, animal performance was not affected by the dietary treatment; because of this, the general pattern of results obtained with either MO formulation at farm gate was similar to that obtained at feed level. Thus, MO diet formulation represents an efficient way to reduce the environmental impacts of pig production without compromising animal performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8289902/ /pubmed/34295934 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.689012 Text en Copyright © 2021 de Quelen, Brossard, Wilfart, Dourmad and Garcia-Launay. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
de Quelen, Francine
Brossard, Ludovic
Wilfart, Aurélie
Dourmad, Jean-Yves
Garcia-Launay, Florence
Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance
title Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance
title_full Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance
title_fullStr Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance
title_full_unstemmed Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance
title_short Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance
title_sort eco-friendly feed formulation and on-farm feed production as ways to reduce the environmental impacts of pig production without consequences on animal performance
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295934
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.689012
work_keys_str_mv AT dequelenfrancine ecofriendlyfeedformulationandonfarmfeedproductionaswaystoreducetheenvironmentalimpactsofpigproductionwithoutconsequencesonanimalperformance
AT brossardludovic ecofriendlyfeedformulationandonfarmfeedproductionaswaystoreducetheenvironmentalimpactsofpigproductionwithoutconsequencesonanimalperformance
AT wilfartaurelie ecofriendlyfeedformulationandonfarmfeedproductionaswaystoreducetheenvironmentalimpactsofpigproductionwithoutconsequencesonanimalperformance
AT dourmadjeanyves ecofriendlyfeedformulationandonfarmfeedproductionaswaystoreducetheenvironmentalimpactsofpigproductionwithoutconsequencesonanimalperformance
AT garcialaunayflorence ecofriendlyfeedformulationandonfarmfeedproductionaswaystoreducetheenvironmentalimpactsofpigproductionwithoutconsequencesonanimalperformance