Cargando…
Incidental findings from cancer next generation sequencing panels
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have facilitated multi-gene panel (MGP) testing to detect germline DNA variants in hereditary cancer patients. This sensitive technique can uncover unexpected, non-germline incidental findings indicative of mosaicism, clonal hematopoiesis (CH), or hemato...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34282142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00224-6 |
_version_ | 1783724395890475008 |
---|---|
author | Maani, Nika Panabaker, Karen McCuaig, Jeanna M. Buckley, Kathleen Semotiuk, Kara Farncombe, Kirsten M. Ainsworth, Peter Panchal, Seema Sadikovic, Bekim Armel, Susan Randall Lin, Hanxin Kim, Raymond H. |
author_facet | Maani, Nika Panabaker, Karen McCuaig, Jeanna M. Buckley, Kathleen Semotiuk, Kara Farncombe, Kirsten M. Ainsworth, Peter Panchal, Seema Sadikovic, Bekim Armel, Susan Randall Lin, Hanxin Kim, Raymond H. |
author_sort | Maani, Nika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have facilitated multi-gene panel (MGP) testing to detect germline DNA variants in hereditary cancer patients. This sensitive technique can uncover unexpected, non-germline incidental findings indicative of mosaicism, clonal hematopoiesis (CH), or hematologic malignancies. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify cases of incidental findings from NGS-MGP testing. Inclusion criteria included: 1) multiple pathogenic variants in the same patient; 2) pathogenic variants at a low allele fraction; and/or 3) the presence of pathogenic variants not consistent with family history. Secondary tissue analysis, complete blood count (CBC) and medical record review were conducted to further delineate the etiology of the pathogenic variants. Of 6060 NGS-MGP tests, 24 cases fulfilling our inclusion criteria were identified. Pathogenic variants were detected in TP53, ATM, CHEK2, BRCA1 and APC. 18/24 (75.0%) patients were classified as CH, 3/24 (12.5%) as mosaic, 2/24 (8.3%) related to a hematologic malignancy, and 1/24 (4.2%) as true germline. We describe a case-specific workflow to identify and interpret the nature of incidental findings on NGS-MGP. This workflow will provide oncology and genetic clinics a practical guide for the management and counselling of patients with unexpected NGS-MGP findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8289933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82899332021-07-23 Incidental findings from cancer next generation sequencing panels Maani, Nika Panabaker, Karen McCuaig, Jeanna M. Buckley, Kathleen Semotiuk, Kara Farncombe, Kirsten M. Ainsworth, Peter Panchal, Seema Sadikovic, Bekim Armel, Susan Randall Lin, Hanxin Kim, Raymond H. NPJ Genom Med Article Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have facilitated multi-gene panel (MGP) testing to detect germline DNA variants in hereditary cancer patients. This sensitive technique can uncover unexpected, non-germline incidental findings indicative of mosaicism, clonal hematopoiesis (CH), or hematologic malignancies. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify cases of incidental findings from NGS-MGP testing. Inclusion criteria included: 1) multiple pathogenic variants in the same patient; 2) pathogenic variants at a low allele fraction; and/or 3) the presence of pathogenic variants not consistent with family history. Secondary tissue analysis, complete blood count (CBC) and medical record review were conducted to further delineate the etiology of the pathogenic variants. Of 6060 NGS-MGP tests, 24 cases fulfilling our inclusion criteria were identified. Pathogenic variants were detected in TP53, ATM, CHEK2, BRCA1 and APC. 18/24 (75.0%) patients were classified as CH, 3/24 (12.5%) as mosaic, 2/24 (8.3%) related to a hematologic malignancy, and 1/24 (4.2%) as true germline. We describe a case-specific workflow to identify and interpret the nature of incidental findings on NGS-MGP. This workflow will provide oncology and genetic clinics a practical guide for the management and counselling of patients with unexpected NGS-MGP findings. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8289933/ /pubmed/34282142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00224-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Maani, Nika Panabaker, Karen McCuaig, Jeanna M. Buckley, Kathleen Semotiuk, Kara Farncombe, Kirsten M. Ainsworth, Peter Panchal, Seema Sadikovic, Bekim Armel, Susan Randall Lin, Hanxin Kim, Raymond H. Incidental findings from cancer next generation sequencing panels |
title | Incidental findings from cancer next generation sequencing panels |
title_full | Incidental findings from cancer next generation sequencing panels |
title_fullStr | Incidental findings from cancer next generation sequencing panels |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidental findings from cancer next generation sequencing panels |
title_short | Incidental findings from cancer next generation sequencing panels |
title_sort | incidental findings from cancer next generation sequencing panels |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34282142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00224-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maaninika incidentalfindingsfromcancernextgenerationsequencingpanels AT panabakerkaren incidentalfindingsfromcancernextgenerationsequencingpanels AT mccuaigjeannam incidentalfindingsfromcancernextgenerationsequencingpanels AT buckleykathleen incidentalfindingsfromcancernextgenerationsequencingpanels AT semotiukkara incidentalfindingsfromcancernextgenerationsequencingpanels AT farncombekirstenm incidentalfindingsfromcancernextgenerationsequencingpanels AT ainsworthpeter incidentalfindingsfromcancernextgenerationsequencingpanels AT panchalseema incidentalfindingsfromcancernextgenerationsequencingpanels AT sadikovicbekim incidentalfindingsfromcancernextgenerationsequencingpanels AT armelsusanrandall incidentalfindingsfromcancernextgenerationsequencingpanels AT linhanxin incidentalfindingsfromcancernextgenerationsequencingpanels AT kimraymondh incidentalfindingsfromcancernextgenerationsequencingpanels |