Cargando…

Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT

This randomized controlled study used corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) to compare the efficacy of Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating mild to moderate diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by detecting early nerve fiber repair. Enrolled patients were randomized approxima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yuanjin, Fan, Dongsheng, Zhang, Yixuan, Zhang, Shuo, Wang, Haikun, Liu, Ziyuan, Wang, Hongli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34282267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94284-4
_version_ 1783724409096241152
author Zhang, Yuanjin
Fan, Dongsheng
Zhang, Yixuan
Zhang, Shuo
Wang, Haikun
Liu, Ziyuan
Wang, Hongli
author_facet Zhang, Yuanjin
Fan, Dongsheng
Zhang, Yixuan
Zhang, Shuo
Wang, Haikun
Liu, Ziyuan
Wang, Hongli
author_sort Zhang, Yuanjin
collection PubMed
description This randomized controlled study used corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) to compare the efficacy of Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating mild to moderate diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by detecting early nerve fiber repair. Enrolled patients were randomized approximately 1:1 to receive Mecobalamin intramuscular injections (0.5 mg/day, 3 times/week) or Mecobalamin oral tablets (1.5 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Primary outcome was change of inferior whorl length (IWL) from baseline. Secondary outcomes included changes of corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL), corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD) and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS). 15 (93.75%) patients in the injection group and 17 (89.47%) patients in the tablet group completed the study. The injection treatment significantly improved patients’ IWL from baseline (21.64 ± 3.00 mm/mm(2) vs 17.64 ± 4.83 mm/mm(2), P < 0.01) while the tablet treatment didn’t. Additionally, the injection treatment led to significantly improved CNFL, CNBD and SAS from baseline (all P < 0.05) while the tablet treatment did not. No patient experienced any adverse events. In conclusion, CCM is sensitive enough to detect the superior efficacy of 8-week Mecobalamin intramuscular injection treatment for DPN compared to the oral tablet treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04372316 (30/04/2020).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8290034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82900342021-07-21 Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT Zhang, Yuanjin Fan, Dongsheng Zhang, Yixuan Zhang, Shuo Wang, Haikun Liu, Ziyuan Wang, Hongli Sci Rep Article This randomized controlled study used corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) to compare the efficacy of Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating mild to moderate diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by detecting early nerve fiber repair. Enrolled patients were randomized approximately 1:1 to receive Mecobalamin intramuscular injections (0.5 mg/day, 3 times/week) or Mecobalamin oral tablets (1.5 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Primary outcome was change of inferior whorl length (IWL) from baseline. Secondary outcomes included changes of corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL), corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD) and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS). 15 (93.75%) patients in the injection group and 17 (89.47%) patients in the tablet group completed the study. The injection treatment significantly improved patients’ IWL from baseline (21.64 ± 3.00 mm/mm(2) vs 17.64 ± 4.83 mm/mm(2), P < 0.01) while the tablet treatment didn’t. Additionally, the injection treatment led to significantly improved CNFL, CNBD and SAS from baseline (all P < 0.05) while the tablet treatment did not. No patient experienced any adverse events. In conclusion, CCM is sensitive enough to detect the superior efficacy of 8-week Mecobalamin intramuscular injection treatment for DPN compared to the oral tablet treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04372316 (30/04/2020). Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8290034/ /pubmed/34282267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94284-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Yuanjin
Fan, Dongsheng
Zhang, Yixuan
Zhang, Shuo
Wang, Haikun
Liu, Ziyuan
Wang, Hongli
Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT
title Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT
title_full Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT
title_fullStr Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT
title_full_unstemmed Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT
title_short Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT
title_sort using corneal confocal microscopy to compare mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a rct
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34282267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94284-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyuanjin usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct
AT fandongsheng usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct
AT zhangyixuan usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct
AT zhangshuo usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct
AT wanghaikun usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct
AT liuziyuan usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct
AT wanghongli usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct