Cargando…
Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT
This randomized controlled study used corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) to compare the efficacy of Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating mild to moderate diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by detecting early nerve fiber repair. Enrolled patients were randomized approxima...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34282267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94284-4 |
_version_ | 1783724409096241152 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yuanjin Fan, Dongsheng Zhang, Yixuan Zhang, Shuo Wang, Haikun Liu, Ziyuan Wang, Hongli |
author_facet | Zhang, Yuanjin Fan, Dongsheng Zhang, Yixuan Zhang, Shuo Wang, Haikun Liu, Ziyuan Wang, Hongli |
author_sort | Zhang, Yuanjin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This randomized controlled study used corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) to compare the efficacy of Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating mild to moderate diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by detecting early nerve fiber repair. Enrolled patients were randomized approximately 1:1 to receive Mecobalamin intramuscular injections (0.5 mg/day, 3 times/week) or Mecobalamin oral tablets (1.5 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Primary outcome was change of inferior whorl length (IWL) from baseline. Secondary outcomes included changes of corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL), corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD) and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS). 15 (93.75%) patients in the injection group and 17 (89.47%) patients in the tablet group completed the study. The injection treatment significantly improved patients’ IWL from baseline (21.64 ± 3.00 mm/mm(2) vs 17.64 ± 4.83 mm/mm(2), P < 0.01) while the tablet treatment didn’t. Additionally, the injection treatment led to significantly improved CNFL, CNBD and SAS from baseline (all P < 0.05) while the tablet treatment did not. No patient experienced any adverse events. In conclusion, CCM is sensitive enough to detect the superior efficacy of 8-week Mecobalamin intramuscular injection treatment for DPN compared to the oral tablet treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04372316 (30/04/2020). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8290034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82900342021-07-21 Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT Zhang, Yuanjin Fan, Dongsheng Zhang, Yixuan Zhang, Shuo Wang, Haikun Liu, Ziyuan Wang, Hongli Sci Rep Article This randomized controlled study used corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) to compare the efficacy of Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating mild to moderate diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by detecting early nerve fiber repair. Enrolled patients were randomized approximately 1:1 to receive Mecobalamin intramuscular injections (0.5 mg/day, 3 times/week) or Mecobalamin oral tablets (1.5 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Primary outcome was change of inferior whorl length (IWL) from baseline. Secondary outcomes included changes of corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL), corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD) and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS). 15 (93.75%) patients in the injection group and 17 (89.47%) patients in the tablet group completed the study. The injection treatment significantly improved patients’ IWL from baseline (21.64 ± 3.00 mm/mm(2) vs 17.64 ± 4.83 mm/mm(2), P < 0.01) while the tablet treatment didn’t. Additionally, the injection treatment led to significantly improved CNFL, CNBD and SAS from baseline (all P < 0.05) while the tablet treatment did not. No patient experienced any adverse events. In conclusion, CCM is sensitive enough to detect the superior efficacy of 8-week Mecobalamin intramuscular injection treatment for DPN compared to the oral tablet treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04372316 (30/04/2020). Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8290034/ /pubmed/34282267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94284-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Yuanjin Fan, Dongsheng Zhang, Yixuan Zhang, Shuo Wang, Haikun Liu, Ziyuan Wang, Hongli Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT |
title | Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT |
title_full | Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT |
title_fullStr | Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT |
title_full_unstemmed | Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT |
title_short | Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT |
title_sort | using corneal confocal microscopy to compare mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a rct |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34282267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94284-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyuanjin usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct AT fandongsheng usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct AT zhangyixuan usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct AT zhangshuo usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct AT wanghaikun usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct AT liuziyuan usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct AT wanghongli usingcornealconfocalmicroscopytocomparemecobalaminintramuscularinjectionsvsoraltabletsintreatingdiabeticperipheralneuropathyarct |