Cargando…

Airborne infection risks of SARS-CoV-2 in U.S. schools and impacts of different intervention strategies

The potential airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has triggered concerns as schools continue to reopen and resume in-person instruction during the current COVID-19 pandemic. It is critical to understand the risks of airborne SARS-CoV-2 transmission under different epidemiological scenarios and opera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: XU, Yifang, CAI, Jiannan, LI, Shuai, HE, Qiang, ZHU, Siyao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34306993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103188
_version_ 1783724419057713152
author XU, Yifang
CAI, Jiannan
LI, Shuai
HE, Qiang
ZHU, Siyao
author_facet XU, Yifang
CAI, Jiannan
LI, Shuai
HE, Qiang
ZHU, Siyao
author_sort XU, Yifang
collection PubMed
description The potential airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has triggered concerns as schools continue to reopen and resume in-person instruction during the current COVID-19 pandemic. It is critical to understand the risks of airborne SARS-CoV-2 transmission under different epidemiological scenarios and operation strategies for schools to make informed decisions to mitigate infection risk. Through scenario-based analysis, this study estimates the airborne infection risk of SARS-CoV-2 in 111,485 U.S. public and private schools and evaluates the impacts of different intervention strategies, including increased ventilation, air filtration, and hybrid learning. Schools in more than 90% of counties exhibit infection risk of higher than 1%, indicating the significance of implementing intervention strategies. Among the considered strategies, air filtration is found to be most effective: the school average infection risk when applying MERV 13 is over 30% less than the risk levels correlating with the use of increased ventilation and hybrid learning strategies, respectively. For most schools, it is necessary to adopt combined intervention strategies to ensure the infection risk below 1%. The results provide insights into airborne infection risk in schools under various scenarios and may guide schools and policymakers in developing effective operations strategies to maintain environmental health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8290078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82900782021-07-20 Airborne infection risks of SARS-CoV-2 in U.S. schools and impacts of different intervention strategies XU, Yifang CAI, Jiannan LI, Shuai HE, Qiang ZHU, Siyao Sustain Cities Soc Article The potential airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has triggered concerns as schools continue to reopen and resume in-person instruction during the current COVID-19 pandemic. It is critical to understand the risks of airborne SARS-CoV-2 transmission under different epidemiological scenarios and operation strategies for schools to make informed decisions to mitigate infection risk. Through scenario-based analysis, this study estimates the airborne infection risk of SARS-CoV-2 in 111,485 U.S. public and private schools and evaluates the impacts of different intervention strategies, including increased ventilation, air filtration, and hybrid learning. Schools in more than 90% of counties exhibit infection risk of higher than 1%, indicating the significance of implementing intervention strategies. Among the considered strategies, air filtration is found to be most effective: the school average infection risk when applying MERV 13 is over 30% less than the risk levels correlating with the use of increased ventilation and hybrid learning strategies, respectively. For most schools, it is necessary to adopt combined intervention strategies to ensure the infection risk below 1%. The results provide insights into airborne infection risk in schools under various scenarios and may guide schools and policymakers in developing effective operations strategies to maintain environmental health. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-11 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8290078/ /pubmed/34306993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103188 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
XU, Yifang
CAI, Jiannan
LI, Shuai
HE, Qiang
ZHU, Siyao
Airborne infection risks of SARS-CoV-2 in U.S. schools and impacts of different intervention strategies
title Airborne infection risks of SARS-CoV-2 in U.S. schools and impacts of different intervention strategies
title_full Airborne infection risks of SARS-CoV-2 in U.S. schools and impacts of different intervention strategies
title_fullStr Airborne infection risks of SARS-CoV-2 in U.S. schools and impacts of different intervention strategies
title_full_unstemmed Airborne infection risks of SARS-CoV-2 in U.S. schools and impacts of different intervention strategies
title_short Airborne infection risks of SARS-CoV-2 in U.S. schools and impacts of different intervention strategies
title_sort airborne infection risks of sars-cov-2 in u.s. schools and impacts of different intervention strategies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34306993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103188
work_keys_str_mv AT xuyifang airborneinfectionrisksofsarscov2inusschoolsandimpactsofdifferentinterventionstrategies
AT caijiannan airborneinfectionrisksofsarscov2inusschoolsandimpactsofdifferentinterventionstrategies
AT lishuai airborneinfectionrisksofsarscov2inusschoolsandimpactsofdifferentinterventionstrategies
AT heqiang airborneinfectionrisksofsarscov2inusschoolsandimpactsofdifferentinterventionstrategies
AT zhusiyao airborneinfectionrisksofsarscov2inusschoolsandimpactsofdifferentinterventionstrategies