Cargando…

m(6)A Regulator-Mediated Methylation Modification Model Predicts Prognosis, Tumor Microenvironment Characterizations and Response to Immunotherapies of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: This study aims to establish an N6-methyladenosine (m(6)A) RNA methylation regulators-mediated methylation model and explore its role in predicting prognostic accuracy of immune contexture and characterizations of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS: The m(6)A modification s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Wenhao, Tian, Xi, Liu, Wangrui, Anwaier, Aihetaimujiang, Su, Jiaqi, Zhu, Wenkai, Wan, Fangning, Shi, Guohai, Wei, Gaomeng, Qu, Yuanyuan, Zhang, Hailiang, Ye, Dingwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295828
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.709579
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study aims to establish an N6-methyladenosine (m(6)A) RNA methylation regulators-mediated methylation model and explore its role in predicting prognostic accuracy of immune contexture and characterizations of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS: The m(6)A modification subclasses (m(6)AMS) were identified by unsupervised cluster analysis and three clusters were determined by consensus clustering algorithm in a discovering cohort. Testing and real-world validation cohorts were used to identify predictive responses for immune checkpoint therapies (ICTs) of m(6)AMS. RESULTS: Prognostic implications landscape of m(6)A regulators in cancers and its differential expression levels in ccRCC patients were identified. Based on discovering cohort, ccRCC were automatically divided into three m(6)AMS, and cluster 3 showed significant worse survival than cluster 1/2. Importantly, it was found that the immune checkpoint molecules expression was significantly elevated in cluster 3. Besides, m(6)A score(Low) group (cluster 1&2) have significantly elevated TIDE score compared with m(6)A score(High) group (cluster 3). There was conspicuous tertiary lymphoid tissue, aggressive phenotype, elevated glycolysis, expression of PD-L1, abundance of CD8(+) T cells, CD4(+) FOXP3(+) Treg cells and TCRn immune cells infiltration in the high m(6)A score group. Interestingly, there are significantly increased patients with clinical benefit in m(6)A score(High) group in 368 patients receiving ICTs from testing IMvigor210 (n = 292) and validation FUSCC (n = 55) cohorts. CONCLUSION: Our discovery highlights the relationship between tumor epigenetic heterogeneity and immune contexture. Immune-rejection cluster 3 has pro-tumorigenic immune infiltration, and shows significant clinical benefits for ccRCC patients receiving ICTs, enabling patient selection for future clinical treatment.