Cargando…
Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?
OBJECTIVE: Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact the rate of mild/moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with a GnRH agonist trigger? METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 285 in-vitro fertilization patients at risk of OHSS who received a GnRH agonist t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34102744 http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.21067 |
_version_ | 1783724435053740032 |
---|---|
author | Rubenfeld, Eryn Sara Dahan, Michael Haim |
author_facet | Rubenfeld, Eryn Sara Dahan, Michael Haim |
author_sort | Rubenfeld, Eryn Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact the rate of mild/moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with a GnRH agonist trigger? METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 285 in-vitro fertilization patients at risk of OHSS who received a GnRH agonist trigger from 2011 to 2019 at McGill University Health Centre. Group 1 (Trig, n=101) began taking cabergoline 0.5 mg orally for 7 days at the time of GnRH agonist trigger, while Group 2 (Retriev, n=184) started taking cabergoline on the day of oocyte retrieval. The rates of OHSS were then compared between the groups using analysis of variance and chi-square analysis, where appropriate. RESULTS: The baseline demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. Trig appeared to be at a slightly higher risk of OHSS based on a significantly higher antral follicle count (20.2±4.2 vs. 19.0±4.3; P=0.02), higher number of stimulated follicles >10 mm at trigger (25.7±7.0 vs. 22.8±8.3, P=0.003), and higher peak serum E2 level (17,325±2,542 vs. 14,822±3,098; P=0.0001). The Trig group had lower rates of mild and moderate OHSS (24% vs. 36%; P=0.045). Neither group had any patients who developed severe OHSS. Trig had fewer patients presenting with pelvic free fluid (13% vs. 23%; P=0.03), lower hematocrit (37.8±4.8% vs. 40.5±4.2%; P=0.0001), higher albumin concentrations (30.4±2.7 vs. 29.5±2.0; P=0.01), and lower potassium concentrations (3.9±0.5 vs. 4.2±0.7; P=0.0002). CONCLUSION: Cabergoline at the time of trigger as compared to the time of collection should be investigated to assess its role in reducing the rates of mild/moderate OHSS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8290150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82901502021-08-04 Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? Rubenfeld, Eryn Sara Dahan, Michael Haim Obstet Gynecol Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact the rate of mild/moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with a GnRH agonist trigger? METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 285 in-vitro fertilization patients at risk of OHSS who received a GnRH agonist trigger from 2011 to 2019 at McGill University Health Centre. Group 1 (Trig, n=101) began taking cabergoline 0.5 mg orally for 7 days at the time of GnRH agonist trigger, while Group 2 (Retriev, n=184) started taking cabergoline on the day of oocyte retrieval. The rates of OHSS were then compared between the groups using analysis of variance and chi-square analysis, where appropriate. RESULTS: The baseline demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. Trig appeared to be at a slightly higher risk of OHSS based on a significantly higher antral follicle count (20.2±4.2 vs. 19.0±4.3; P=0.02), higher number of stimulated follicles >10 mm at trigger (25.7±7.0 vs. 22.8±8.3, P=0.003), and higher peak serum E2 level (17,325±2,542 vs. 14,822±3,098; P=0.0001). The Trig group had lower rates of mild and moderate OHSS (24% vs. 36%; P=0.045). Neither group had any patients who developed severe OHSS. Trig had fewer patients presenting with pelvic free fluid (13% vs. 23%; P=0.03), lower hematocrit (37.8±4.8% vs. 40.5±4.2%; P=0.0001), higher albumin concentrations (30.4±2.7 vs. 29.5±2.0; P=0.01), and lower potassium concentrations (3.9±0.5 vs. 4.2±0.7; P=0.0002). CONCLUSION: Cabergoline at the time of trigger as compared to the time of collection should be investigated to assess its role in reducing the rates of mild/moderate OHSS. Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2021-07 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8290150/ /pubmed/34102744 http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.21067 Text en Copyright © 2021 Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/Articles published in Obstet Gynecol Sci are open-access, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rubenfeld, Eryn Sara Dahan, Michael Haim Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? |
title | Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? |
title_full | Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? |
title_fullStr | Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? |
title_short | Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? |
title_sort | does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34102744 http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.21067 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rubenfelderynsara doesthetimingofcabergolineadministrationimpactratesofovarianhyperstimulationsyndrome AT dahanmichaelhaim doesthetimingofcabergolineadministrationimpactratesofovarianhyperstimulationsyndrome |