Cargando…

Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?

OBJECTIVE: Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact the rate of mild/moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with a GnRH agonist trigger? METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 285 in-vitro fertilization patients at risk of OHSS who received a GnRH agonist t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rubenfeld, Eryn Sara, Dahan, Michael Haim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34102744
http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.21067
_version_ 1783724435053740032
author Rubenfeld, Eryn Sara
Dahan, Michael Haim
author_facet Rubenfeld, Eryn Sara
Dahan, Michael Haim
author_sort Rubenfeld, Eryn Sara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact the rate of mild/moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with a GnRH agonist trigger? METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 285 in-vitro fertilization patients at risk of OHSS who received a GnRH agonist trigger from 2011 to 2019 at McGill University Health Centre. Group 1 (Trig, n=101) began taking cabergoline 0.5 mg orally for 7 days at the time of GnRH agonist trigger, while Group 2 (Retriev, n=184) started taking cabergoline on the day of oocyte retrieval. The rates of OHSS were then compared between the groups using analysis of variance and chi-square analysis, where appropriate. RESULTS: The baseline demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. Trig appeared to be at a slightly higher risk of OHSS based on a significantly higher antral follicle count (20.2±4.2 vs. 19.0±4.3; P=0.02), higher number of stimulated follicles >10 mm at trigger (25.7±7.0 vs. 22.8±8.3, P=0.003), and higher peak serum E2 level (17,325±2,542 vs. 14,822±3,098; P=0.0001). The Trig group had lower rates of mild and moderate OHSS (24% vs. 36%; P=0.045). Neither group had any patients who developed severe OHSS. Trig had fewer patients presenting with pelvic free fluid (13% vs. 23%; P=0.03), lower hematocrit (37.8±4.8% vs. 40.5±4.2%; P=0.0001), higher albumin concentrations (30.4±2.7 vs. 29.5±2.0; P=0.01), and lower potassium concentrations (3.9±0.5 vs. 4.2±0.7; P=0.0002). CONCLUSION: Cabergoline at the time of trigger as compared to the time of collection should be investigated to assess its role in reducing the rates of mild/moderate OHSS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8290150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82901502021-08-04 Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? Rubenfeld, Eryn Sara Dahan, Michael Haim Obstet Gynecol Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact the rate of mild/moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with a GnRH agonist trigger? METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 285 in-vitro fertilization patients at risk of OHSS who received a GnRH agonist trigger from 2011 to 2019 at McGill University Health Centre. Group 1 (Trig, n=101) began taking cabergoline 0.5 mg orally for 7 days at the time of GnRH agonist trigger, while Group 2 (Retriev, n=184) started taking cabergoline on the day of oocyte retrieval. The rates of OHSS were then compared between the groups using analysis of variance and chi-square analysis, where appropriate. RESULTS: The baseline demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. Trig appeared to be at a slightly higher risk of OHSS based on a significantly higher antral follicle count (20.2±4.2 vs. 19.0±4.3; P=0.02), higher number of stimulated follicles >10 mm at trigger (25.7±7.0 vs. 22.8±8.3, P=0.003), and higher peak serum E2 level (17,325±2,542 vs. 14,822±3,098; P=0.0001). The Trig group had lower rates of mild and moderate OHSS (24% vs. 36%; P=0.045). Neither group had any patients who developed severe OHSS. Trig had fewer patients presenting with pelvic free fluid (13% vs. 23%; P=0.03), lower hematocrit (37.8±4.8% vs. 40.5±4.2%; P=0.0001), higher albumin concentrations (30.4±2.7 vs. 29.5±2.0; P=0.01), and lower potassium concentrations (3.9±0.5 vs. 4.2±0.7; P=0.0002). CONCLUSION: Cabergoline at the time of trigger as compared to the time of collection should be investigated to assess its role in reducing the rates of mild/moderate OHSS. Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2021-07 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8290150/ /pubmed/34102744 http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.21067 Text en Copyright © 2021 Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/Articles published in Obstet Gynecol Sci are open-access, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rubenfeld, Eryn Sara
Dahan, Michael Haim
Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?
title Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?
title_full Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?
title_fullStr Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?
title_full_unstemmed Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?
title_short Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?
title_sort does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34102744
http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.21067
work_keys_str_mv AT rubenfelderynsara doesthetimingofcabergolineadministrationimpactratesofovarianhyperstimulationsyndrome
AT dahanmichaelhaim doesthetimingofcabergolineadministrationimpactratesofovarianhyperstimulationsyndrome