Cargando…
Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience
PURPOSE: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after prior myotomy (PM-POEM) can be technically challenging with possible increased adverse events. We aimed to assess gas leak and mucosal injury incidence during PM-POEM, compared to an index POEM (iPOEM), and post-procedure extubation time. PATIENTS AND...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295172 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S297338 |
_version_ | 1783724444426960896 |
---|---|
author | Samo, Salih Hamo, Falak Jain, Anand S Shah, Rushikesh H Patel, Vaishali Calderon, Lucie F Xie, Mengdan Mekaroonkamol, Parit Keilin, Steven A Cai, Qiang |
author_facet | Samo, Salih Hamo, Falak Jain, Anand S Shah, Rushikesh H Patel, Vaishali Calderon, Lucie F Xie, Mengdan Mekaroonkamol, Parit Keilin, Steven A Cai, Qiang |
author_sort | Samo, Salih |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after prior myotomy (PM-POEM) can be technically challenging with possible increased adverse events. We aimed to assess gas leak and mucosal injury incidence during PM-POEM, compared to an index POEM (iPOEM), and post-procedure extubation time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study comparing PM-POEM to iPOEM from March 2016 to August 2018. RESULTS: There were 21 subjects in the PM-POEM and 56 subjects in the iPOEM. The PM-POEM group was younger (average age 44.33 vs 57.57 years, p=0.0082). Gas leak incidence did not differ between groups (28.6% in PM-POEM vs 14.3% in iPOEM, p=0.148). For cases with imaging available postoperatively, there was a trend towards higher incidence of gas leak in the PM-POEM, but it was not statistically significant (60% vs 42.1%, p=0.359). The post-procedure extubation time was not different between PM-POEM and iPOEM (11.38 vs 9.46 minutes, p=0.93), but it was longer when gas leak occurred (15.92 vs 8.67 minutes, p=0.027). The odds of mucosal injury were four-fold higher (OR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.32–14.08), and more clips were used to close mucosal injuries (0.62 vs 0.14 clips, p=0.0053) in the PM-POEM group. More procedures were deemed difficult or challenging in the PM-POEM (33.3% vs 7.1%, p=0.007). The number of clips used to close the mucosotomy was not different between groups (4.05 vs 3.84 clips, p=0.498). Although the myotomy was shorter in PM-POEM, it was not statistically significant (6.38 vs 7.14 cm, p=0.074). However, the procedure was longer in PM-POEM (61.28 vs 45.39 minutes, p=0.0017). There was no intervention or ICU admission required pertinent to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Performing PM-POEM can be more difficult with more mucosal injuries. Gas leak was associated with a slightly longer post-procedure extubation time, but clinical relevance is unclear given incidence of gas leak was unknown at time of extubation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8290189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82901892021-07-21 Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience Samo, Salih Hamo, Falak Jain, Anand S Shah, Rushikesh H Patel, Vaishali Calderon, Lucie F Xie, Mengdan Mekaroonkamol, Parit Keilin, Steven A Cai, Qiang Clin Exp Gastroenterol Original Research PURPOSE: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after prior myotomy (PM-POEM) can be technically challenging with possible increased adverse events. We aimed to assess gas leak and mucosal injury incidence during PM-POEM, compared to an index POEM (iPOEM), and post-procedure extubation time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study comparing PM-POEM to iPOEM from March 2016 to August 2018. RESULTS: There were 21 subjects in the PM-POEM and 56 subjects in the iPOEM. The PM-POEM group was younger (average age 44.33 vs 57.57 years, p=0.0082). Gas leak incidence did not differ between groups (28.6% in PM-POEM vs 14.3% in iPOEM, p=0.148). For cases with imaging available postoperatively, there was a trend towards higher incidence of gas leak in the PM-POEM, but it was not statistically significant (60% vs 42.1%, p=0.359). The post-procedure extubation time was not different between PM-POEM and iPOEM (11.38 vs 9.46 minutes, p=0.93), but it was longer when gas leak occurred (15.92 vs 8.67 minutes, p=0.027). The odds of mucosal injury were four-fold higher (OR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.32–14.08), and more clips were used to close mucosal injuries (0.62 vs 0.14 clips, p=0.0053) in the PM-POEM group. More procedures were deemed difficult or challenging in the PM-POEM (33.3% vs 7.1%, p=0.007). The number of clips used to close the mucosotomy was not different between groups (4.05 vs 3.84 clips, p=0.498). Although the myotomy was shorter in PM-POEM, it was not statistically significant (6.38 vs 7.14 cm, p=0.074). However, the procedure was longer in PM-POEM (61.28 vs 45.39 minutes, p=0.0017). There was no intervention or ICU admission required pertinent to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Performing PM-POEM can be more difficult with more mucosal injuries. Gas leak was associated with a slightly longer post-procedure extubation time, but clinical relevance is unclear given incidence of gas leak was unknown at time of extubation. Dove 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8290189/ /pubmed/34295172 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S297338 Text en © 2021 Samo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Samo, Salih Hamo, Falak Jain, Anand S Shah, Rushikesh H Patel, Vaishali Calderon, Lucie F Xie, Mengdan Mekaroonkamol, Parit Keilin, Steven A Cai, Qiang Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience |
title | Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full | Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience |
title_fullStr | Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience |
title_short | Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience |
title_sort | gas leak and mucosal injury during endoscopic esophageal myotomy after previous myotomy: a single-center experience |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295172 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S297338 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samosalih gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience AT hamofalak gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience AT jainanands gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience AT shahrushikeshh gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience AT patelvaishali gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience AT calderonlucief gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience AT xiemengdan gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience AT mekaroonkamolparit gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience AT keilinstevena gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience AT caiqiang gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience |