Cargando…

Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience

PURPOSE: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after prior myotomy (PM-POEM) can be technically challenging with possible increased adverse events. We aimed to assess gas leak and mucosal injury incidence during PM-POEM, compared to an index POEM (iPOEM), and post-procedure extubation time. PATIENTS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samo, Salih, Hamo, Falak, Jain, Anand S, Shah, Rushikesh H, Patel, Vaishali, Calderon, Lucie F, Xie, Mengdan, Mekaroonkamol, Parit, Keilin, Steven A, Cai, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295172
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S297338
_version_ 1783724444426960896
author Samo, Salih
Hamo, Falak
Jain, Anand S
Shah, Rushikesh H
Patel, Vaishali
Calderon, Lucie F
Xie, Mengdan
Mekaroonkamol, Parit
Keilin, Steven A
Cai, Qiang
author_facet Samo, Salih
Hamo, Falak
Jain, Anand S
Shah, Rushikesh H
Patel, Vaishali
Calderon, Lucie F
Xie, Mengdan
Mekaroonkamol, Parit
Keilin, Steven A
Cai, Qiang
author_sort Samo, Salih
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after prior myotomy (PM-POEM) can be technically challenging with possible increased adverse events. We aimed to assess gas leak and mucosal injury incidence during PM-POEM, compared to an index POEM (iPOEM), and post-procedure extubation time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study comparing PM-POEM to iPOEM from March 2016 to August 2018. RESULTS: There were 21 subjects in the PM-POEM and 56 subjects in the iPOEM. The PM-POEM group was younger (average age 44.33 vs 57.57 years, p=0.0082). Gas leak incidence did not differ between groups (28.6% in PM-POEM vs 14.3% in iPOEM, p=0.148). For cases with imaging available postoperatively, there was a trend towards higher incidence of gas leak in the PM-POEM, but it was not statistically significant (60% vs 42.1%, p=0.359). The post-procedure extubation time was not different between PM-POEM and iPOEM (11.38 vs 9.46 minutes, p=0.93), but it was longer when gas leak occurred (15.92 vs 8.67 minutes, p=0.027). The odds of mucosal injury were four-fold higher (OR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.32–14.08), and more clips were used to close mucosal injuries (0.62 vs 0.14 clips, p=0.0053) in the PM-POEM group. More procedures were deemed difficult or challenging in the PM-POEM (33.3% vs 7.1%, p=0.007). The number of clips used to close the mucosotomy was not different between groups (4.05 vs 3.84 clips, p=0.498). Although the myotomy was shorter in PM-POEM, it was not statistically significant (6.38 vs 7.14 cm, p=0.074). However, the procedure was longer in PM-POEM (61.28 vs 45.39 minutes, p=0.0017). There was no intervention or ICU admission required pertinent to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Performing PM-POEM can be more difficult with more mucosal injuries. Gas leak was associated with a slightly longer post-procedure extubation time, but clinical relevance is unclear given incidence of gas leak was unknown at time of extubation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8290189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82901892021-07-21 Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience Samo, Salih Hamo, Falak Jain, Anand S Shah, Rushikesh H Patel, Vaishali Calderon, Lucie F Xie, Mengdan Mekaroonkamol, Parit Keilin, Steven A Cai, Qiang Clin Exp Gastroenterol Original Research PURPOSE: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after prior myotomy (PM-POEM) can be technically challenging with possible increased adverse events. We aimed to assess gas leak and mucosal injury incidence during PM-POEM, compared to an index POEM (iPOEM), and post-procedure extubation time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study comparing PM-POEM to iPOEM from March 2016 to August 2018. RESULTS: There were 21 subjects in the PM-POEM and 56 subjects in the iPOEM. The PM-POEM group was younger (average age 44.33 vs 57.57 years, p=0.0082). Gas leak incidence did not differ between groups (28.6% in PM-POEM vs 14.3% in iPOEM, p=0.148). For cases with imaging available postoperatively, there was a trend towards higher incidence of gas leak in the PM-POEM, but it was not statistically significant (60% vs 42.1%, p=0.359). The post-procedure extubation time was not different between PM-POEM and iPOEM (11.38 vs 9.46 minutes, p=0.93), but it was longer when gas leak occurred (15.92 vs 8.67 minutes, p=0.027). The odds of mucosal injury were four-fold higher (OR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.32–14.08), and more clips were used to close mucosal injuries (0.62 vs 0.14 clips, p=0.0053) in the PM-POEM group. More procedures were deemed difficult or challenging in the PM-POEM (33.3% vs 7.1%, p=0.007). The number of clips used to close the mucosotomy was not different between groups (4.05 vs 3.84 clips, p=0.498). Although the myotomy was shorter in PM-POEM, it was not statistically significant (6.38 vs 7.14 cm, p=0.074). However, the procedure was longer in PM-POEM (61.28 vs 45.39 minutes, p=0.0017). There was no intervention or ICU admission required pertinent to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Performing PM-POEM can be more difficult with more mucosal injuries. Gas leak was associated with a slightly longer post-procedure extubation time, but clinical relevance is unclear given incidence of gas leak was unknown at time of extubation. Dove 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8290189/ /pubmed/34295172 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S297338 Text en © 2021 Samo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Samo, Salih
Hamo, Falak
Jain, Anand S
Shah, Rushikesh H
Patel, Vaishali
Calderon, Lucie F
Xie, Mengdan
Mekaroonkamol, Parit
Keilin, Steven A
Cai, Qiang
Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience
title Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience
title_full Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience
title_short Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort gas leak and mucosal injury during endoscopic esophageal myotomy after previous myotomy: a single-center experience
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295172
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S297338
work_keys_str_mv AT samosalih gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience
AT hamofalak gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience
AT jainanands gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience
AT shahrushikeshh gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience
AT patelvaishali gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience
AT calderonlucief gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience
AT xiemengdan gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience
AT mekaroonkamolparit gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience
AT keilinstevena gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience
AT caiqiang gasleakandmucosalinjuryduringendoscopicesophagealmyotomyafterpreviousmyotomyasinglecenterexperience