Cargando…

Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production

Meloidogyne incognita (southern root-knot nematode, SRKN) is a major pest in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) production in the Southeastern United States. Management has relied on fumigant and carbamate non-fumigant nematicides. New non-fumigant nematicides, such as fluopyram, are available and field...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grabau, Zane J., Liu, Chang, Sandoval-Ruiz, Rebeca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Exeley Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34296191
http://dx.doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2021-055
_version_ 1783724506571866112
author Grabau, Zane J.
Liu, Chang
Sandoval-Ruiz, Rebeca
author_facet Grabau, Zane J.
Liu, Chang
Sandoval-Ruiz, Rebeca
author_sort Grabau, Zane J.
collection PubMed
description Meloidogyne incognita (southern root-knot nematode, SRKN) is a major pest in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) production in the Southeastern United States. Management has relied on fumigant and carbamate non-fumigant nematicides. New non-fumigant nematicides, such as fluopyram, are available and field evaluation of new nematicides is needed. The objectives of this research were to assess the efficacy of new (fluopyram) and established (oxamyl) non-fumigant nematicides as well as fumigation (1,3-dichloropropene) for (1) SRKN management, and (2) impacts on total soil abundances of non-target, free-living nematodes in field tests in Florida. Fumigation with 1,3-D consistently managed SRKN and, in two of three trials, increased yield relative to untreated. Oxamyl and fluopyram also had efficacy in managing SRKN, but were inconsistent from year to year. Oxamyl provided better root galling control than fluopyram in one of two trials, but otherwise those nematicides provided similar SRKN management and yield response. Supplementing 1,3-D fumigation with fluopyram did not improve SRKN management or yield relative to fumigation alone. Fumigation consistently reduced free-living nematode abundances relative to untreated. Oxamyl and fluopyram were more inconsistent, but always reduced total free-living nematode abundances when effective against SRKN. In summary, while non-fumigant nematicides provided some management of SRKN, fumigation continued to be the most consistent option. All nematicides had deleterious effects on free-living nematodes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8290502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Exeley Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82905022021-07-21 Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production Grabau, Zane J. Liu, Chang Sandoval-Ruiz, Rebeca J Nematol Arts & Humanities Meloidogyne incognita (southern root-knot nematode, SRKN) is a major pest in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) production in the Southeastern United States. Management has relied on fumigant and carbamate non-fumigant nematicides. New non-fumigant nematicides, such as fluopyram, are available and field evaluation of new nematicides is needed. The objectives of this research were to assess the efficacy of new (fluopyram) and established (oxamyl) non-fumigant nematicides as well as fumigation (1,3-dichloropropene) for (1) SRKN management, and (2) impacts on total soil abundances of non-target, free-living nematodes in field tests in Florida. Fumigation with 1,3-D consistently managed SRKN and, in two of three trials, increased yield relative to untreated. Oxamyl and fluopyram also had efficacy in managing SRKN, but were inconsistent from year to year. Oxamyl provided better root galling control than fluopyram in one of two trials, but otherwise those nematicides provided similar SRKN management and yield response. Supplementing 1,3-D fumigation with fluopyram did not improve SRKN management or yield relative to fumigation alone. Fumigation consistently reduced free-living nematode abundances relative to untreated. Oxamyl and fluopyram were more inconsistent, but always reduced total free-living nematode abundances when effective against SRKN. In summary, while non-fumigant nematicides provided some management of SRKN, fumigation continued to be the most consistent option. All nematicides had deleterious effects on free-living nematodes. Exeley Inc. 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8290502/ /pubmed/34296191 http://dx.doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2021-055 Text en © 2021 Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Arts & Humanities
Grabau, Zane J.
Liu, Chang
Sandoval-Ruiz, Rebeca
Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production
title Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production
title_full Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production
title_fullStr Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production
title_full_unstemmed Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production
title_short Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production
title_sort meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production
topic Arts & Humanities
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34296191
http://dx.doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2021-055
work_keys_str_mv AT grabauzanej meloidogyneincognitamanagementbynematicidesintomatoproduction
AT liuchang meloidogyneincognitamanagementbynematicidesintomatoproduction
AT sandovalruizrebeca meloidogyneincognitamanagementbynematicidesintomatoproduction