Cargando…
Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production
Meloidogyne incognita (southern root-knot nematode, SRKN) is a major pest in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) production in the Southeastern United States. Management has relied on fumigant and carbamate non-fumigant nematicides. New non-fumigant nematicides, such as fluopyram, are available and field...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Exeley Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34296191 http://dx.doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2021-055 |
_version_ | 1783724506571866112 |
---|---|
author | Grabau, Zane J. Liu, Chang Sandoval-Ruiz, Rebeca |
author_facet | Grabau, Zane J. Liu, Chang Sandoval-Ruiz, Rebeca |
author_sort | Grabau, Zane J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Meloidogyne incognita (southern root-knot nematode, SRKN) is a major pest in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) production in the Southeastern United States. Management has relied on fumigant and carbamate non-fumigant nematicides. New non-fumigant nematicides, such as fluopyram, are available and field evaluation of new nematicides is needed. The objectives of this research were to assess the efficacy of new (fluopyram) and established (oxamyl) non-fumigant nematicides as well as fumigation (1,3-dichloropropene) for (1) SRKN management, and (2) impacts on total soil abundances of non-target, free-living nematodes in field tests in Florida. Fumigation with 1,3-D consistently managed SRKN and, in two of three trials, increased yield relative to untreated. Oxamyl and fluopyram also had efficacy in managing SRKN, but were inconsistent from year to year. Oxamyl provided better root galling control than fluopyram in one of two trials, but otherwise those nematicides provided similar SRKN management and yield response. Supplementing 1,3-D fumigation with fluopyram did not improve SRKN management or yield relative to fumigation alone. Fumigation consistently reduced free-living nematode abundances relative to untreated. Oxamyl and fluopyram were more inconsistent, but always reduced total free-living nematode abundances when effective against SRKN. In summary, while non-fumigant nematicides provided some management of SRKN, fumigation continued to be the most consistent option. All nematicides had deleterious effects on free-living nematodes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8290502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Exeley Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82905022021-07-21 Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production Grabau, Zane J. Liu, Chang Sandoval-Ruiz, Rebeca J Nematol Arts & Humanities Meloidogyne incognita (southern root-knot nematode, SRKN) is a major pest in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) production in the Southeastern United States. Management has relied on fumigant and carbamate non-fumigant nematicides. New non-fumigant nematicides, such as fluopyram, are available and field evaluation of new nematicides is needed. The objectives of this research were to assess the efficacy of new (fluopyram) and established (oxamyl) non-fumigant nematicides as well as fumigation (1,3-dichloropropene) for (1) SRKN management, and (2) impacts on total soil abundances of non-target, free-living nematodes in field tests in Florida. Fumigation with 1,3-D consistently managed SRKN and, in two of three trials, increased yield relative to untreated. Oxamyl and fluopyram also had efficacy in managing SRKN, but were inconsistent from year to year. Oxamyl provided better root galling control than fluopyram in one of two trials, but otherwise those nematicides provided similar SRKN management and yield response. Supplementing 1,3-D fumigation with fluopyram did not improve SRKN management or yield relative to fumigation alone. Fumigation consistently reduced free-living nematode abundances relative to untreated. Oxamyl and fluopyram were more inconsistent, but always reduced total free-living nematode abundances when effective against SRKN. In summary, while non-fumigant nematicides provided some management of SRKN, fumigation continued to be the most consistent option. All nematicides had deleterious effects on free-living nematodes. Exeley Inc. 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8290502/ /pubmed/34296191 http://dx.doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2021-055 Text en © 2021 Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Arts & Humanities Grabau, Zane J. Liu, Chang Sandoval-Ruiz, Rebeca Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production |
title | Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production |
title_full | Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production |
title_fullStr | Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production |
title_full_unstemmed | Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production |
title_short | Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production |
title_sort | meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production |
topic | Arts & Humanities |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34296191 http://dx.doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2021-055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grabauzanej meloidogyneincognitamanagementbynematicidesintomatoproduction AT liuchang meloidogyneincognitamanagementbynematicidesintomatoproduction AT sandovalruizrebeca meloidogyneincognitamanagementbynematicidesintomatoproduction |