Cargando…

Preoperative Radiomics Analysis of 1p/19q Status in WHO Grade II Gliomas

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to preoperatively predict the status of 1p/19q based on radiomics analysis in patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade II gliomas. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 157 patients with WHO grade II gliomas (76 patients with astrocytomas with mutant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Ziwen, Sun, Zhiyan, Fang, Shengyu, Li, Yiming, Liu, Xing, Liang, Yucha, Liu, Yukun, Zhou, Chunyao, Zhu, Qiang, Zhang, Hong, Li, Tianshi, Li, Shaowu, Jiang, Tao, Wang, Yinyan, Wang, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295805
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.616740
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The present study aimed to preoperatively predict the status of 1p/19q based on radiomics analysis in patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade II gliomas. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 157 patients with WHO grade II gliomas (76 patients with astrocytomas with mutant IDH, 16 patients with astrocytomas with wild-type IDH, and 65 patients with oligodendrogliomas with mutant IDH and 1p/19q codeletion). Radiomic features were extracted from magnetic resonance images, including T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and contrast T1-weighted images. Elastic net and support vector machines with radial basis function kernel were applied in nested 10-fold cross-validation loops to predict the 1p/19q status. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and precision-recall analysis were used to evaluate the model performance. Student’s t-tests were then used to compare the posterior probabilities of 1p/19q co-deletion prediction in the group with different 1p/19q status. RESULTS: Six valuable radiomic features, along with age, were selected with the nested 10-fold cross-validation loops. Five features showed significant difference in patients with different 1p/19q status. The area under curve and accuracy of the predictive model were 0.8079 (95% confidence interval, 0.733–0.8755) and 0.758 (0.6879–0.8217), respectively, and the F1-score of the precision-recall curve achieved 0.6667 (0.5201–0.7705). The posterior probabilities in the 1p/19q co-deletion group were significantly different from the non-deletion group. CONCLUSION: Combined radiomics analysis and machine learning showed potential clinical utility in the preoperative prediction of 1p/19q status, which can aid in making customized neurosurgery plans and glioma management strategies before postoperative pathology.