Cargando…
Large variations of oxygen delivery in self-inflating resuscitation bags used for preoxygenation - a mechanical simulation
BACKGROUND: Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags (SIRB) are common and essential tools in airway management and ventilation. They are often used in resuscitation and emergency anaesthesia outside the operating theatre. There is a common notion that all SIRBs applied with a tight sealed mask will delive...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34281616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00885-3 |
_version_ | 1783724513220886528 |
---|---|
author | Grauman, Sven Johansson, Joakim Drevhammar, Thomas |
author_facet | Grauman, Sven Johansson, Joakim Drevhammar, Thomas |
author_sort | Grauman, Sven |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags (SIRB) are common and essential tools in airway management and ventilation. They are often used in resuscitation and emergency anaesthesia outside the operating theatre. There is a common notion that all SIRBs applied with a tight sealed mask will deliver close to 100 % oxygen during spontaneous breathing. The aim of the study was to measure the oxygen delivery of six commonly used SIRBs in a mechanical spontaneous breathing adult in vitro model. METHODS: Three SIRBs of each of the six models were evaluated for oxygen delivery during simulated breathing with an adult mechanical lung. The test was repeated three times per device (54 tests in total). The breathing profile was fixed to a minute volume of 10 L/min, a tidal volume of 500 mL and the SIRBs supplied with an oxygen fresh gas flow of 15 L/min. The fraction of delivered oxygen (FDO(2)) was measured over a three-minute period. Average FDO(2) was calculated and compared at 30, 60 and 90 s. RESULTS: At 90 s all models had reached a stable FDO(2). Average FDO(2) at 90 s; Ambu Oval Plus 99,5 %; Ambu Spur II 99,8 %; Intersurgical BVM Resuscitator 76,7 %; Laerdal Silicone 97,3 %; Laerdal The Bag II 94,5 % and the O-Two Smart Bag 39,0 %. All differences in FDO(2) were significant apart from the two Ambu models. CONCLUSIONS: In simulated spontaneous breathing, four out of six (by Ambu and Laerdal) Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags delivered a high fraction of oxygen while two (Intersurgical and O-two) underperformed in oxygen delivery. These large variations confirm results reported in other studies. It is our opinion that underperforming Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags might pose a serious threat to patients’ health if used in resuscitation and anaesthesia. Manufacturers of Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags rarely provide information on performance for spontaneous breathing. This poses a challenge to all organizations that need their devices to deliver adequate oxygen during spontaneous breathing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8290536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82905362021-07-20 Large variations of oxygen delivery in self-inflating resuscitation bags used for preoxygenation - a mechanical simulation Grauman, Sven Johansson, Joakim Drevhammar, Thomas Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags (SIRB) are common and essential tools in airway management and ventilation. They are often used in resuscitation and emergency anaesthesia outside the operating theatre. There is a common notion that all SIRBs applied with a tight sealed mask will deliver close to 100 % oxygen during spontaneous breathing. The aim of the study was to measure the oxygen delivery of six commonly used SIRBs in a mechanical spontaneous breathing adult in vitro model. METHODS: Three SIRBs of each of the six models were evaluated for oxygen delivery during simulated breathing with an adult mechanical lung. The test was repeated three times per device (54 tests in total). The breathing profile was fixed to a minute volume of 10 L/min, a tidal volume of 500 mL and the SIRBs supplied with an oxygen fresh gas flow of 15 L/min. The fraction of delivered oxygen (FDO(2)) was measured over a three-minute period. Average FDO(2) was calculated and compared at 30, 60 and 90 s. RESULTS: At 90 s all models had reached a stable FDO(2). Average FDO(2) at 90 s; Ambu Oval Plus 99,5 %; Ambu Spur II 99,8 %; Intersurgical BVM Resuscitator 76,7 %; Laerdal Silicone 97,3 %; Laerdal The Bag II 94,5 % and the O-Two Smart Bag 39,0 %. All differences in FDO(2) were significant apart from the two Ambu models. CONCLUSIONS: In simulated spontaneous breathing, four out of six (by Ambu and Laerdal) Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags delivered a high fraction of oxygen while two (Intersurgical and O-two) underperformed in oxygen delivery. These large variations confirm results reported in other studies. It is our opinion that underperforming Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags might pose a serious threat to patients’ health if used in resuscitation and anaesthesia. Manufacturers of Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags rarely provide information on performance for spontaneous breathing. This poses a challenge to all organizations that need their devices to deliver adequate oxygen during spontaneous breathing. BioMed Central 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8290536/ /pubmed/34281616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00885-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Grauman, Sven Johansson, Joakim Drevhammar, Thomas Large variations of oxygen delivery in self-inflating resuscitation bags used for preoxygenation - a mechanical simulation |
title | Large variations of oxygen delivery in self-inflating resuscitation bags used for preoxygenation - a mechanical simulation |
title_full | Large variations of oxygen delivery in self-inflating resuscitation bags used for preoxygenation - a mechanical simulation |
title_fullStr | Large variations of oxygen delivery in self-inflating resuscitation bags used for preoxygenation - a mechanical simulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Large variations of oxygen delivery in self-inflating resuscitation bags used for preoxygenation - a mechanical simulation |
title_short | Large variations of oxygen delivery in self-inflating resuscitation bags used for preoxygenation - a mechanical simulation |
title_sort | large variations of oxygen delivery in self-inflating resuscitation bags used for preoxygenation - a mechanical simulation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34281616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00885-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT graumansven largevariationsofoxygendeliveryinselfinflatingresuscitationbagsusedforpreoxygenationamechanicalsimulation AT johanssonjoakim largevariationsofoxygendeliveryinselfinflatingresuscitationbagsusedforpreoxygenationamechanicalsimulation AT drevhammarthomas largevariationsofoxygendeliveryinselfinflatingresuscitationbagsusedforpreoxygenationamechanicalsimulation |