Cargando…

Subclinical cardiac perforation by cardiac implantable electronic device leads detected by cardiac computed tomography

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the characteristics of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) leads and subclinical cardiac perforations remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of subclinical cardiac perforation among various CIED leads using cardiac computed tomograph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Yeong-Min, Uhm, Jae-Sun, Kim, Min, Kim, In-Soo, Jin, Moo-Nyun, Yu, Hee Tae, Kim, Tae-Hoon, Lee, Hye-Jeong, Kim, Young-Jin, Joung, Boyoung, Pak, Hui-Nam, Lee, Moon-Hyoung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34281506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02159-3
_version_ 1783724516943331328
author Lim, Yeong-Min
Uhm, Jae-Sun
Kim, Min
Kim, In-Soo
Jin, Moo-Nyun
Yu, Hee Tae
Kim, Tae-Hoon
Lee, Hye-Jeong
Kim, Young-Jin
Joung, Boyoung
Pak, Hui-Nam
Lee, Moon-Hyoung
author_facet Lim, Yeong-Min
Uhm, Jae-Sun
Kim, Min
Kim, In-Soo
Jin, Moo-Nyun
Yu, Hee Tae
Kim, Tae-Hoon
Lee, Hye-Jeong
Kim, Young-Jin
Joung, Boyoung
Pak, Hui-Nam
Lee, Moon-Hyoung
author_sort Lim, Yeong-Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relationship between the characteristics of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) leads and subclinical cardiac perforations remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of subclinical cardiac perforation among various CIED leads using cardiac computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 271 consecutive patients with 463 CIED leads, who underwent cardiac CT after CIED implantation, were included in this retrospective observational study. Cardiac CT images were reviewed by one radiologist and two cardiologists. Subclinical perforation was defined as traversal of the lead tip past the outer myocardial layer without symptoms and signs related to cardiac perforation. We compared the subclinical cardiac perforation rates of the available lead types. RESULTS: A total of 219, 49, and 3 patients had pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy, respectively. The total subclinical cardiac perforation rate was 5.6%. Subclinical cardiac perforation by screw-in ventricular leads was significantly more frequent than that caused by tined ventricular leads (13.3% vs 3.3%, respectively, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the incidence of cardiac perforation between atrial and ventricular leads, screw-in and tined atrial leads, pacing and defibrillator ventricular leads, nor between magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional and MR-unsafe screw-in ventricular leads. Screw-in ventricular leads were significantly associated with subclinical cardiac perforation [odds ratio, 4.554; 95% confidence interval, 1.587–13.065, p = 0.005]. There was no case subclinical cardiac perforation by septal ventricular leads. CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical cardiac perforation by screw-in ventricular leads is not rare. Septal pacing may be helpful in avoiding cardiac perforation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-02159-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8290553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82905532021-07-20 Subclinical cardiac perforation by cardiac implantable electronic device leads detected by cardiac computed tomography Lim, Yeong-Min Uhm, Jae-Sun Kim, Min Kim, In-Soo Jin, Moo-Nyun Yu, Hee Tae Kim, Tae-Hoon Lee, Hye-Jeong Kim, Young-Jin Joung, Boyoung Pak, Hui-Nam Lee, Moon-Hyoung BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research BACKGROUND: The relationship between the characteristics of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) leads and subclinical cardiac perforations remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of subclinical cardiac perforation among various CIED leads using cardiac computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 271 consecutive patients with 463 CIED leads, who underwent cardiac CT after CIED implantation, were included in this retrospective observational study. Cardiac CT images were reviewed by one radiologist and two cardiologists. Subclinical perforation was defined as traversal of the lead tip past the outer myocardial layer without symptoms and signs related to cardiac perforation. We compared the subclinical cardiac perforation rates of the available lead types. RESULTS: A total of 219, 49, and 3 patients had pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy, respectively. The total subclinical cardiac perforation rate was 5.6%. Subclinical cardiac perforation by screw-in ventricular leads was significantly more frequent than that caused by tined ventricular leads (13.3% vs 3.3%, respectively, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the incidence of cardiac perforation between atrial and ventricular leads, screw-in and tined atrial leads, pacing and defibrillator ventricular leads, nor between magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional and MR-unsafe screw-in ventricular leads. Screw-in ventricular leads were significantly associated with subclinical cardiac perforation [odds ratio, 4.554; 95% confidence interval, 1.587–13.065, p = 0.005]. There was no case subclinical cardiac perforation by septal ventricular leads. CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical cardiac perforation by screw-in ventricular leads is not rare. Septal pacing may be helpful in avoiding cardiac perforation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-02159-3. BioMed Central 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8290553/ /pubmed/34281506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02159-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lim, Yeong-Min
Uhm, Jae-Sun
Kim, Min
Kim, In-Soo
Jin, Moo-Nyun
Yu, Hee Tae
Kim, Tae-Hoon
Lee, Hye-Jeong
Kim, Young-Jin
Joung, Boyoung
Pak, Hui-Nam
Lee, Moon-Hyoung
Subclinical cardiac perforation by cardiac implantable electronic device leads detected by cardiac computed tomography
title Subclinical cardiac perforation by cardiac implantable electronic device leads detected by cardiac computed tomography
title_full Subclinical cardiac perforation by cardiac implantable electronic device leads detected by cardiac computed tomography
title_fullStr Subclinical cardiac perforation by cardiac implantable electronic device leads detected by cardiac computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Subclinical cardiac perforation by cardiac implantable electronic device leads detected by cardiac computed tomography
title_short Subclinical cardiac perforation by cardiac implantable electronic device leads detected by cardiac computed tomography
title_sort subclinical cardiac perforation by cardiac implantable electronic device leads detected by cardiac computed tomography
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34281506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02159-3
work_keys_str_mv AT limyeongmin subclinicalcardiacperforationbycardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadsdetectedbycardiaccomputedtomography
AT uhmjaesun subclinicalcardiacperforationbycardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadsdetectedbycardiaccomputedtomography
AT kimmin subclinicalcardiacperforationbycardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadsdetectedbycardiaccomputedtomography
AT kiminsoo subclinicalcardiacperforationbycardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadsdetectedbycardiaccomputedtomography
AT jinmoonyun subclinicalcardiacperforationbycardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadsdetectedbycardiaccomputedtomography
AT yuheetae subclinicalcardiacperforationbycardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadsdetectedbycardiaccomputedtomography
AT kimtaehoon subclinicalcardiacperforationbycardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadsdetectedbycardiaccomputedtomography
AT leehyejeong subclinicalcardiacperforationbycardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadsdetectedbycardiaccomputedtomography
AT kimyoungjin subclinicalcardiacperforationbycardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadsdetectedbycardiaccomputedtomography
AT joungboyoung subclinicalcardiacperforationbycardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadsdetectedbycardiaccomputedtomography
AT pakhuinam subclinicalcardiacperforationbycardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadsdetectedbycardiaccomputedtomography
AT leemoonhyoung subclinicalcardiacperforationbycardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadsdetectedbycardiaccomputedtomography