Cargando…

Multi-omics approach highlights differences between RLP classes in Arabidopsis thaliana

BACKGROUND: The Leucine rich-repeat (LRR) receptor-like protein (RLP) family is a complex gene family with 57 members in Arabidopsis thaliana. Some members of the RLP family are known to be involved in basal developmental processes, whereas others are involved in defence responses. However, function...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steidele, C. E., Stam, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34284718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-07855-0
_version_ 1783724517640634368
author Steidele, C. E.
Stam, R.
author_facet Steidele, C. E.
Stam, R.
author_sort Steidele, C. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Leucine rich-repeat (LRR) receptor-like protein (RLP) family is a complex gene family with 57 members in Arabidopsis thaliana. Some members of the RLP family are known to be involved in basal developmental processes, whereas others are involved in defence responses. However, functional data is currently only available for a small subset of RLPs, leaving the remaining ones classified as RLPs of unknown function. RESULTS: Using publicly available datasets, we annotated RLPs of unknown function as either likely defence-related or likely fulfilling a more basal function in plants. Then, using these categories, we can identify important characteristics that differ between the RLP subclasses. We found that the two classes differ in abundance on both transcriptome and proteome level, physical clustering in the genome and putative interaction partners. However, the classes do not differ in the genetic di versity of their individual members in accessible pan-genome data. CONCLUSIONS: Our work has several implications for work related to functional studies on RLPs as well as for the understanding of RLP gene family evolution. Using our annotations, we can make suggestions on which RLPs can be identified as potential immune receptors using genetics tools and thereby complement disease studies. The lack of differences in nucleotide diversity between the two RLP subclasses further suggests that non-synonymous diversity of gene sequences alone cannot distinguish defence from developmental genes. By contrast, differences in transcript and protein abundance or clustering at genomic loci might also allow for functional annotations and characterisation in other plant species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-021-07855-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8290556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82905562021-07-20 Multi-omics approach highlights differences between RLP classes in Arabidopsis thaliana Steidele, C. E. Stam, R. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The Leucine rich-repeat (LRR) receptor-like protein (RLP) family is a complex gene family with 57 members in Arabidopsis thaliana. Some members of the RLP family are known to be involved in basal developmental processes, whereas others are involved in defence responses. However, functional data is currently only available for a small subset of RLPs, leaving the remaining ones classified as RLPs of unknown function. RESULTS: Using publicly available datasets, we annotated RLPs of unknown function as either likely defence-related or likely fulfilling a more basal function in plants. Then, using these categories, we can identify important characteristics that differ between the RLP subclasses. We found that the two classes differ in abundance on both transcriptome and proteome level, physical clustering in the genome and putative interaction partners. However, the classes do not differ in the genetic di versity of their individual members in accessible pan-genome data. CONCLUSIONS: Our work has several implications for work related to functional studies on RLPs as well as for the understanding of RLP gene family evolution. Using our annotations, we can make suggestions on which RLPs can be identified as potential immune receptors using genetics tools and thereby complement disease studies. The lack of differences in nucleotide diversity between the two RLP subclasses further suggests that non-synonymous diversity of gene sequences alone cannot distinguish defence from developmental genes. By contrast, differences in transcript and protein abundance or clustering at genomic loci might also allow for functional annotations and characterisation in other plant species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-021-07855-0. BioMed Central 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8290556/ /pubmed/34284718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-07855-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Steidele, C. E.
Stam, R.
Multi-omics approach highlights differences between RLP classes in Arabidopsis thaliana
title Multi-omics approach highlights differences between RLP classes in Arabidopsis thaliana
title_full Multi-omics approach highlights differences between RLP classes in Arabidopsis thaliana
title_fullStr Multi-omics approach highlights differences between RLP classes in Arabidopsis thaliana
title_full_unstemmed Multi-omics approach highlights differences between RLP classes in Arabidopsis thaliana
title_short Multi-omics approach highlights differences between RLP classes in Arabidopsis thaliana
title_sort multi-omics approach highlights differences between rlp classes in arabidopsis thaliana
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34284718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-07855-0
work_keys_str_mv AT steidelece multiomicsapproachhighlightsdifferencesbetweenrlpclassesinarabidopsisthaliana
AT stamr multiomicsapproachhighlightsdifferencesbetweenrlpclassesinarabidopsisthaliana