Cargando…

Thinking green: modelling respirator reuse strategies to reduce cost and waste

OBJECTIVES: To compare the impact of respirator extended use and reuse strategies with regard to cost and sustainability during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Cost analysis. SETTING: USA. PARTICIPANTS: All healthcare workers within the USA. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A mod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chu, Jacqueline, Ghenand, Omkar, Collins, Joy, Byrne, James, Wentworth, Adam, Chai, Peter R., Dadabhoy, Farah, Hur, Chin, Traverso, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048687
_version_ 1783724552896905216
author Chu, Jacqueline
Ghenand, Omkar
Collins, Joy
Byrne, James
Wentworth, Adam
Chai, Peter R.
Dadabhoy, Farah
Hur, Chin
Traverso, Giovanni
author_facet Chu, Jacqueline
Ghenand, Omkar
Collins, Joy
Byrne, James
Wentworth, Adam
Chai, Peter R.
Dadabhoy, Farah
Hur, Chin
Traverso, Giovanni
author_sort Chu, Jacqueline
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the impact of respirator extended use and reuse strategies with regard to cost and sustainability during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Cost analysis. SETTING: USA. PARTICIPANTS: All healthcare workers within the USA. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A model was developed to estimate usage, costs and waste incurred by several respirator usage strategies over the first 6 months of the pandemic in the USA. This model assumed universal masking of all healthcare workers. Estimates were taken from the literature, government databases and commercially available data from approved vendors. RESULTS: A new N95 respirator per patient encounter would require 7.41 billion respirators, cost $6.38 billion and generate 84.0 million kg of waste in the USA over 6 months. One respirator per day per healthcare worker would require 3.29 billion respirators, cost $2.83 billion and generate 37.22 million kg of waste. Decontamination by ultraviolet germicidal irradiation would require 1.64 billion respirators, cost $1.41 billion and accumulate 18.61 million kg of waste. H(2)O(2) vapour decontamination would require 1.15 billion respirators, cost $1.65 billion and produce 13.03 million kg of waste. One reusable respirator with daily disposable filters would require 18 million respirators, cost $1.24 billion and generate 15.73 million kg of waste. Pairing a reusable respirator with H(2)O(2) vapour-decontaminated filters would reduce cost to $831 million and generate 1.58 million kg of waste. The use of one surgical mask per healthcare worker per day would require 3.29 billion masks, cost $460 million and generate 27.92 million kg of waste. CONCLUSIONS: Decontamination and reusable respirator-based strategies decreased the number of respirators used, costs and waste generated compared with single-use or daily extended-use of disposable respirators. Future development of low-cost, simple technologies to enable respirator and/or filter decontamination is needed to further minimise the economic and environmental costs of masks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8290946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82909462021-07-20 Thinking green: modelling respirator reuse strategies to reduce cost and waste Chu, Jacqueline Ghenand, Omkar Collins, Joy Byrne, James Wentworth, Adam Chai, Peter R. Dadabhoy, Farah Hur, Chin Traverso, Giovanni BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: To compare the impact of respirator extended use and reuse strategies with regard to cost and sustainability during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Cost analysis. SETTING: USA. PARTICIPANTS: All healthcare workers within the USA. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A model was developed to estimate usage, costs and waste incurred by several respirator usage strategies over the first 6 months of the pandemic in the USA. This model assumed universal masking of all healthcare workers. Estimates were taken from the literature, government databases and commercially available data from approved vendors. RESULTS: A new N95 respirator per patient encounter would require 7.41 billion respirators, cost $6.38 billion and generate 84.0 million kg of waste in the USA over 6 months. One respirator per day per healthcare worker would require 3.29 billion respirators, cost $2.83 billion and generate 37.22 million kg of waste. Decontamination by ultraviolet germicidal irradiation would require 1.64 billion respirators, cost $1.41 billion and accumulate 18.61 million kg of waste. H(2)O(2) vapour decontamination would require 1.15 billion respirators, cost $1.65 billion and produce 13.03 million kg of waste. One reusable respirator with daily disposable filters would require 18 million respirators, cost $1.24 billion and generate 15.73 million kg of waste. Pairing a reusable respirator with H(2)O(2) vapour-decontaminated filters would reduce cost to $831 million and generate 1.58 million kg of waste. The use of one surgical mask per healthcare worker per day would require 3.29 billion masks, cost $460 million and generate 27.92 million kg of waste. CONCLUSIONS: Decontamination and reusable respirator-based strategies decreased the number of respirators used, costs and waste generated compared with single-use or daily extended-use of disposable respirators. Future development of low-cost, simple technologies to enable respirator and/or filter decontamination is needed to further minimise the economic and environmental costs of masks. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8290946/ /pubmed/34275864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048687 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Economics
Chu, Jacqueline
Ghenand, Omkar
Collins, Joy
Byrne, James
Wentworth, Adam
Chai, Peter R.
Dadabhoy, Farah
Hur, Chin
Traverso, Giovanni
Thinking green: modelling respirator reuse strategies to reduce cost and waste
title Thinking green: modelling respirator reuse strategies to reduce cost and waste
title_full Thinking green: modelling respirator reuse strategies to reduce cost and waste
title_fullStr Thinking green: modelling respirator reuse strategies to reduce cost and waste
title_full_unstemmed Thinking green: modelling respirator reuse strategies to reduce cost and waste
title_short Thinking green: modelling respirator reuse strategies to reduce cost and waste
title_sort thinking green: modelling respirator reuse strategies to reduce cost and waste
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048687
work_keys_str_mv AT chujacqueline thinkinggreenmodellingrespiratorreusestrategiestoreducecostandwaste
AT ghenandomkar thinkinggreenmodellingrespiratorreusestrategiestoreducecostandwaste
AT collinsjoy thinkinggreenmodellingrespiratorreusestrategiestoreducecostandwaste
AT byrnejames thinkinggreenmodellingrespiratorreusestrategiestoreducecostandwaste
AT wentworthadam thinkinggreenmodellingrespiratorreusestrategiestoreducecostandwaste
AT chaipeterr thinkinggreenmodellingrespiratorreusestrategiestoreducecostandwaste
AT dadabhoyfarah thinkinggreenmodellingrespiratorreusestrategiestoreducecostandwaste
AT hurchin thinkinggreenmodellingrespiratorreusestrategiestoreducecostandwaste
AT traversogiovanni thinkinggreenmodellingrespiratorreusestrategiestoreducecostandwaste