Cargando…

Phase I trial compensation: How much do healthy volunteers actually earn from clinical trial enrollment?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Financial compensation for research participation is a major focus of ethical concern regarding human subject recruitment. Phase I trials are sometimes considered to be a lucrative source of income for healthy volunteers, encouraging some people to become “professional guinea pigs.”...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Fisher, Jill A, McManus, Lisa, Kalbaugh, Julianne M, Walker, Rebecca L
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:	Ethics
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17407745211011069

Ejemplares similares

Healthy volunteers in US phase I clinical trials: Sociodemographic characteristics and participation over time
por: Kalbaugh, Corey A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Healthy volunteers' perceptions of risk in US Phase I clinical trials: A mixed-methods study
por: Fisher, Jill A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Do protocols for new randomised trials take previous similar trials into account? Cohort study of contemporary trial protocols
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Informal professionalization of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials in Russia
por: Zvonareva, Olga, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Dissemination of trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic clinical trials: an audit of trial investigators intentions
por: Raza, M Zulfiqar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

How do community advisory boards fulfil their ethical role in HIV clinical trials? A protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence
por: Pancras, Godwin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy: Halachic Considerations for Enrolling in an Experimental Clinical Trial
por: Tendler, Rabbi Moshe D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cosmetic Surgery in Teenagers: To Do or Not to Do
por: Singh, Kuldeep
Publicado: (2015)

TwiC or treat? Are trials within cohorts ethically defensible?
por: Weijer, Charles, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: a guide for the perplexed
por: Nix, Hayden P, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Healthy Volunteers for Clinical Trials in Resource-Poor Settings: National Registries Can Address Ethical and Safety Concerns
por: BOMPART, FRANCOIS
Publicado: (2019)

The Lived Experience Of Participants in an African RandomiseD trial (LEOPARD): protocol for an in-depth qualitative study within a multisite randomised controlled trial for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis
por: Lawrence, David S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reconsidering ‘minimal risk’ to expand the repertoire of trials with waiver of informed consent for research
por: Monach, Paul A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Details of risk–benefit communication in informed consent documents for phase I/II trials
por: Kahrass, Hannes, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Advance consent for participation in randomised controlled trials for emergency conditions: a scoping review
por: Niznick, Naomi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Public reporting of clinical trial findings as an ethical responsibility to participants: a qualitative study
por: Morrow, Richard L, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Too much of a good thing? An observational study of prolific authors
por: Wager, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A critical appraisal of clinical trials conducted and subsequent drug approvals in India and South Africa
por: Limaye, Dnyanesh, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies
por: Miller, Jennifer E, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Denneny, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Protocol for a systematic scoping review of reasons given to justify the performance of randomised controlled trials
por: Dewar, Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Advanced consent for participation in acute care randomised control trials: protocol for a scoping review
por: Niznick, Naomi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Strzebonska, Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Patient burden and clinical advances associated with postapproval monotherapy cancer drug trials: a retrospective cohort study
por: Carlisle, Benjamin Gregory, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Rationalisations for women-only randomised controlled trials in conditions that affect both sexes: a scoping review protocol
por: Matthewson, Ainsley, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cross-sectional assessment of patient attitudes towards participation in clinical trials: does making results publicly available matter?
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Consent processes in cluster-randomised trials in residential facilities for older adults: a systematic review of reporting practices and proposed guidelines
por: DiazOrdaz, Karla, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Improved parental understanding by an enhanced informed consent form: a randomized controlled study nested in a paediatric drug trial
por: Koonrungsesomboon, Nut, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Clinical trial registration, reporting, publication and FDAAA compliance: a cross-sectional analysis and ranking of new drugs approved by the FDA in 2012
por: Miller, Jennifer E, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
por: Mhaskar, Rahul, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Money-oriented risk-takers or deliberate decision-makers: a cross-sectional survey study of participants in controlled human infection trials
por: Hoogerwerf, Marie-Astrid, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage
por: Sweeney, Lorna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Best Case/Worst Case: protocol for a multisite randomised clinical trial of a scenario planning intervention for patients with kidney failure
por: Haug, Karlie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Ethics of treatment interruption trials in HIV cure research: addressing the conundrum of risk/benefit assessment
por: Henderson, Gail E, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Parental comprehension of the benefits/risks of first-line randomised clinical trials in children with solid tumours: a two-stage cross-sectional interview study
por: Chappuy, Hélène, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study
por: Parker, Melissa J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Clinical trial transparency and data sharing among biopharmaceutical companies and the role of company size, location and product type: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis
por: Axson, Sydney A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Research priorities relating to the debate on assisted dying: what do we still need to know? Results of a modified Delphi technique
por: Rodgers, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Exploring the Legacies of Filmed Patient Narratives: The Interpretation and Appropriation of Patient Films by Health Care Staff
por: Adams, Mary, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers
por: Shearman, Kirstie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_qbhgf2dks0io0oei5tukn6gsd8