Cargando…

Multicentre, randomised, single-blind, parallel group trial to compare the effectiveness of a Holter for Parkinson’s symptoms against other clinical monitoring methods: study protocol

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, multiple studies have aimed to develop and validate portable technological devices capable of monitoring the motor complications of Parkinson’s disease patients (Parkinson’s Holter). The effectiveness of these monitoring devices for improving clinical control is not kn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez-Molinero, Alejandro, Hernández-Vara, Jorge, Miñarro, Antonio, Pérez-López, Carlos, Bayes-Rusiñol, Àngels, Martínez-Castrillo, Juan Carlos, Pérez-Martínez, David A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8291311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34281918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045272
_version_ 1783724611533275136
author Rodríguez-Molinero, Alejandro
Hernández-Vara, Jorge
Miñarro, Antonio
Pérez-López, Carlos
Bayes-Rusiñol, Àngels
Martínez-Castrillo, Juan Carlos
Pérez-Martínez, David A
author_facet Rodríguez-Molinero, Alejandro
Hernández-Vara, Jorge
Miñarro, Antonio
Pérez-López, Carlos
Bayes-Rusiñol, Àngels
Martínez-Castrillo, Juan Carlos
Pérez-Martínez, David A
author_sort Rodríguez-Molinero, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In recent years, multiple studies have aimed to develop and validate portable technological devices capable of monitoring the motor complications of Parkinson’s disease patients (Parkinson’s Holter). The effectiveness of these monitoring devices for improving clinical control is not known. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-blind, cluster-randomised controlled clinical trial. Neurologists from Spanish health centres will be randomly assigned to one of three study arms (1:1:1): (a) therapeutic adjustment using information from a Parkinson’s Holter that will be worn by their patients for 7 days, (b) therapeutic adjustment using information from a diary of motor fluctuations that will be completed by their patients for 7 days and (c) therapeutic adjustment using clinical information collected during consultation. It is expected that 162 consecutive patients will be included over a period of 6 months. The primary outcome is the efficiency of the Parkinson’s Holter compared with traditional clinical practice in terms of Off time reduction with respect to the baseline (recorded through a diary of motor fluctuations, which will be completed by all patients). As secondary outcomes, changes in variables related to other motor complications (dyskinesia and freezing of gait), quality of life, autonomy in activities of daily living, adherence to the monitoring system and number of doctor–patient contacts will be analysed. The noninferiority of the Parkinson’s Holter against the diary of motor fluctuations in terms of Off time reduction will be studied as the exploratory objective. Ethics and dissemination approval for this study has been obtained from the Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge Ethics Committee. The results of this study will inform the practical utility of the objective information provided by a Parkinson’s Holter and, therefore, the convenience of adopting this technology in clinical practice and in future clinical trials. We expect public dissemination of the results in 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04176302; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04176302
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8291311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82913112021-08-05 Multicentre, randomised, single-blind, parallel group trial to compare the effectiveness of a Holter for Parkinson’s symptoms against other clinical monitoring methods: study protocol Rodríguez-Molinero, Alejandro Hernández-Vara, Jorge Miñarro, Antonio Pérez-López, Carlos Bayes-Rusiñol, Àngels Martínez-Castrillo, Juan Carlos Pérez-Martínez, David A BMJ Open Neurology INTRODUCTION: In recent years, multiple studies have aimed to develop and validate portable technological devices capable of monitoring the motor complications of Parkinson’s disease patients (Parkinson’s Holter). The effectiveness of these monitoring devices for improving clinical control is not known. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-blind, cluster-randomised controlled clinical trial. Neurologists from Spanish health centres will be randomly assigned to one of three study arms (1:1:1): (a) therapeutic adjustment using information from a Parkinson’s Holter that will be worn by their patients for 7 days, (b) therapeutic adjustment using information from a diary of motor fluctuations that will be completed by their patients for 7 days and (c) therapeutic adjustment using clinical information collected during consultation. It is expected that 162 consecutive patients will be included over a period of 6 months. The primary outcome is the efficiency of the Parkinson’s Holter compared with traditional clinical practice in terms of Off time reduction with respect to the baseline (recorded through a diary of motor fluctuations, which will be completed by all patients). As secondary outcomes, changes in variables related to other motor complications (dyskinesia and freezing of gait), quality of life, autonomy in activities of daily living, adherence to the monitoring system and number of doctor–patient contacts will be analysed. The noninferiority of the Parkinson’s Holter against the diary of motor fluctuations in terms of Off time reduction will be studied as the exploratory objective. Ethics and dissemination approval for this study has been obtained from the Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge Ethics Committee. The results of this study will inform the practical utility of the objective information provided by a Parkinson’s Holter and, therefore, the convenience of adopting this technology in clinical practice and in future clinical trials. We expect public dissemination of the results in 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04176302; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04176302 BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8291311/ /pubmed/34281918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045272 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Neurology
Rodríguez-Molinero, Alejandro
Hernández-Vara, Jorge
Miñarro, Antonio
Pérez-López, Carlos
Bayes-Rusiñol, Àngels
Martínez-Castrillo, Juan Carlos
Pérez-Martínez, David A
Multicentre, randomised, single-blind, parallel group trial to compare the effectiveness of a Holter for Parkinson’s symptoms against other clinical monitoring methods: study protocol
title Multicentre, randomised, single-blind, parallel group trial to compare the effectiveness of a Holter for Parkinson’s symptoms against other clinical monitoring methods: study protocol
title_full Multicentre, randomised, single-blind, parallel group trial to compare the effectiveness of a Holter for Parkinson’s symptoms against other clinical monitoring methods: study protocol
title_fullStr Multicentre, randomised, single-blind, parallel group trial to compare the effectiveness of a Holter for Parkinson’s symptoms against other clinical monitoring methods: study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Multicentre, randomised, single-blind, parallel group trial to compare the effectiveness of a Holter for Parkinson’s symptoms against other clinical monitoring methods: study protocol
title_short Multicentre, randomised, single-blind, parallel group trial to compare the effectiveness of a Holter for Parkinson’s symptoms against other clinical monitoring methods: study protocol
title_sort multicentre, randomised, single-blind, parallel group trial to compare the effectiveness of a holter for parkinson’s symptoms against other clinical monitoring methods: study protocol
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8291311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34281918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045272
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezmolineroalejandro multicentrerandomisedsingleblindparallelgrouptrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofaholterforparkinsonssymptomsagainstotherclinicalmonitoringmethodsstudyprotocol
AT hernandezvarajorge multicentrerandomisedsingleblindparallelgrouptrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofaholterforparkinsonssymptomsagainstotherclinicalmonitoringmethodsstudyprotocol
AT minarroantonio multicentrerandomisedsingleblindparallelgrouptrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofaholterforparkinsonssymptomsagainstotherclinicalmonitoringmethodsstudyprotocol
AT perezlopezcarlos multicentrerandomisedsingleblindparallelgrouptrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofaholterforparkinsonssymptomsagainstotherclinicalmonitoringmethodsstudyprotocol
AT bayesrusinolangels multicentrerandomisedsingleblindparallelgrouptrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofaholterforparkinsonssymptomsagainstotherclinicalmonitoringmethodsstudyprotocol
AT martinezcastrillojuancarlos multicentrerandomisedsingleblindparallelgrouptrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofaholterforparkinsonssymptomsagainstotherclinicalmonitoringmethodsstudyprotocol
AT perezmartinezdavida multicentrerandomisedsingleblindparallelgrouptrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofaholterforparkinsonssymptomsagainstotherclinicalmonitoringmethodsstudyprotocol
AT multicentrerandomisedsingleblindparallelgrouptrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofaholterforparkinsonssymptomsagainstotherclinicalmonitoringmethodsstudyprotocol