Cargando…
Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens
PURPOSE: To compare the visual performance of the AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens and the TECNIS Symfony extended depth-of-focus lens at near and distance visual ranges. METHODS: A total of 146 patients (221 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification and cataract extraction and received e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8291815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295144 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S321779 |
_version_ | 1783724715507974144 |
---|---|
author | Moshirfar, Majid Ellis, James Beesley, Daniel McCabe, Shannon E Lewis, Adam West, William B Ronquillo, Yasmyne Hoopes, Phillip |
author_facet | Moshirfar, Majid Ellis, James Beesley, Daniel McCabe, Shannon E Lewis, Adam West, William B Ronquillo, Yasmyne Hoopes, Phillip |
author_sort | Moshirfar, Majid |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the visual performance of the AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens and the TECNIS Symfony extended depth-of-focus lens at near and distance visual ranges. METHODS: A total of 146 patients (221 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification and cataract extraction and received either a PanOptix or Symfony lens from January 2019 to July 2020 were included in the study (83 PanOptix non-toric, 30 PanOptix toric, 70 Symfony non-toric, and 38 Symfony toric). Uncorrected distance (UDVA), uncorrected near (UNVA), and corrected distance (CDVA) visual acuity were assessed at one-day, one-month, and three-months postoperatively. Averages of UDVA, UNVA, and CDVA were taken to evaluate which lens was superior at near and distance visual ranges. Secondary outcome measures including glare, halo, dryness, and problems with night vision were documented at each postoperative visit. RESULTS: At one month postoperatively, the average UNVA was 0.16 ± 0.14 logMAR in the PanOptix group and 0.21 ± 0.14 logMAR in the Symfony group (P=0.007); the average UDVA for the PanOptix group was 0.09 ± 0.13 logMAR compared to the Symfony group at 0.10 ± 0.14 logMAR (P=0.67); and the average CDVA was 0.02 ± 0.05 logMAR in the PanOptix group and 0.00 ± 0.04 logMAR in the Symfony group (P=0.11). At three months postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences in UNVA, UDVA, or CDVA between the two groups (P=0.18, 0.79, 0.68 respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in secondary outcome measures at one- and three-months (P=0.49, 0.10 respectively). CONCLUSION: The AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens appears to afford better UNVA compared to the TECNIS Symfony extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens at one-month postoperatively, though this difference was not seen at three months postoperatively. There is no statistically significant difference in UDVA and CDVA between the two groups at postoperative day one, one-month, and three-months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8291815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82918152021-07-21 Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens Moshirfar, Majid Ellis, James Beesley, Daniel McCabe, Shannon E Lewis, Adam West, William B Ronquillo, Yasmyne Hoopes, Phillip Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the visual performance of the AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens and the TECNIS Symfony extended depth-of-focus lens at near and distance visual ranges. METHODS: A total of 146 patients (221 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification and cataract extraction and received either a PanOptix or Symfony lens from January 2019 to July 2020 were included in the study (83 PanOptix non-toric, 30 PanOptix toric, 70 Symfony non-toric, and 38 Symfony toric). Uncorrected distance (UDVA), uncorrected near (UNVA), and corrected distance (CDVA) visual acuity were assessed at one-day, one-month, and three-months postoperatively. Averages of UDVA, UNVA, and CDVA were taken to evaluate which lens was superior at near and distance visual ranges. Secondary outcome measures including glare, halo, dryness, and problems with night vision were documented at each postoperative visit. RESULTS: At one month postoperatively, the average UNVA was 0.16 ± 0.14 logMAR in the PanOptix group and 0.21 ± 0.14 logMAR in the Symfony group (P=0.007); the average UDVA for the PanOptix group was 0.09 ± 0.13 logMAR compared to the Symfony group at 0.10 ± 0.14 logMAR (P=0.67); and the average CDVA was 0.02 ± 0.05 logMAR in the PanOptix group and 0.00 ± 0.04 logMAR in the Symfony group (P=0.11). At three months postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences in UNVA, UDVA, or CDVA between the two groups (P=0.18, 0.79, 0.68 respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in secondary outcome measures at one- and three-months (P=0.49, 0.10 respectively). CONCLUSION: The AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens appears to afford better UNVA compared to the TECNIS Symfony extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens at one-month postoperatively, though this difference was not seen at three months postoperatively. There is no statistically significant difference in UDVA and CDVA between the two groups at postoperative day one, one-month, and three-months. Dove 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8291815/ /pubmed/34295144 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S321779 Text en © 2021 Moshirfar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Moshirfar, Majid Ellis, James Beesley, Daniel McCabe, Shannon E Lewis, Adam West, William B Ronquillo, Yasmyne Hoopes, Phillip Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens |
title | Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens |
title_full | Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens |
title_short | Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens |
title_sort | comparison of the visual outcomes of an extended depth-of-focus lens and a trifocal lens |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8291815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295144 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S321779 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moshirfarmajid comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT ellisjames comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT beesleydaniel comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT mccabeshannone comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT lewisadam comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT westwilliamb comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT ronquilloyasmyne comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT hoopesphillip comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens |