Cargando…
Comparison of Outcomes After Breast Cancer Surgery Between Inhalational and Propofol-Based Intravenous Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: General anaesthesia is the commonly provided for breast cancer surgery, but the effects of inhalational anaesthesia and propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia on short- and long-term outcomes after breast cancer surgery are not clear. In this study, we conduct a meta-analysis of randomiz...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8291825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295185 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S315360 |
_version_ | 1783724717946961920 |
---|---|
author | Pang, Qian-Yun Duan, Li-Ping Jiang, Yan Liu, Hong-Liang |
author_facet | Pang, Qian-Yun Duan, Li-Ping Jiang, Yan Liu, Hong-Liang |
author_sort | Pang, Qian-Yun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: General anaesthesia is the commonly provided for breast cancer surgery, but the effects of inhalational anaesthesia and propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia on short- and long-term outcomes after breast cancer surgery are not clear. In this study, we conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore the superior anaesthetic for breast cancer surgery patients. METHODS: We searched the Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases (up to January, 2021) for RCTs in which inhalational anaesthesia and propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia were compared and short- and long-term outcomes were assessed in breast cancer surgical patients. The meta-analysis was performed by Stata 12.0. RESULTS: Twenty RCTs with a total of 2201 patients were included. Compared with inhalational anaesthesia, propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia was associated with more postoperative rescue analgesia (I(2)=0%, RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07–1.30, P=0.001) but a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (I(2)=25.5%, RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62–0.81, P<0.001) and postoperative rescue antiemetics (I(2)=0%, RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58–0.82, P<0.001). Propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia preserved nature killer cell cytotoxicity (I(2)=86.2%, SMD: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.13–1.39, P=0.018), decreased IL-6 level (I(2)=98.0%, SMD: −3.09, 95% CI: −5.70– −0.48, P=0.021) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (I(2)=0%, SMD: −0.28, 95% CI: −0.53– −0.03, P=0.030), and increased 2-year recurrence-free survival rate (I(2)=0%, RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00–1.20, P=0.043) but did not affect recurrence or the overall survival rate (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia increases postoperative rescue analgesia but reduces PONV compared with inhalational anaesthesia in breast cancer surgery. The benefit of propofol over inhalational anaesthetics in the preservation of anti-cancer immunity is obvious, but it is difficult to conclude that propofol can exert long-term benefits due to the small sample size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8291825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82918252021-07-21 Comparison of Outcomes After Breast Cancer Surgery Between Inhalational and Propofol-Based Intravenous Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Pang, Qian-Yun Duan, Li-Ping Jiang, Yan Liu, Hong-Liang J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: General anaesthesia is the commonly provided for breast cancer surgery, but the effects of inhalational anaesthesia and propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia on short- and long-term outcomes after breast cancer surgery are not clear. In this study, we conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore the superior anaesthetic for breast cancer surgery patients. METHODS: We searched the Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases (up to January, 2021) for RCTs in which inhalational anaesthesia and propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia were compared and short- and long-term outcomes were assessed in breast cancer surgical patients. The meta-analysis was performed by Stata 12.0. RESULTS: Twenty RCTs with a total of 2201 patients were included. Compared with inhalational anaesthesia, propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia was associated with more postoperative rescue analgesia (I(2)=0%, RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07–1.30, P=0.001) but a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (I(2)=25.5%, RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62–0.81, P<0.001) and postoperative rescue antiemetics (I(2)=0%, RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58–0.82, P<0.001). Propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia preserved nature killer cell cytotoxicity (I(2)=86.2%, SMD: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.13–1.39, P=0.018), decreased IL-6 level (I(2)=98.0%, SMD: −3.09, 95% CI: −5.70– −0.48, P=0.021) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (I(2)=0%, SMD: −0.28, 95% CI: −0.53– −0.03, P=0.030), and increased 2-year recurrence-free survival rate (I(2)=0%, RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00–1.20, P=0.043) but did not affect recurrence or the overall survival rate (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia increases postoperative rescue analgesia but reduces PONV compared with inhalational anaesthesia in breast cancer surgery. The benefit of propofol over inhalational anaesthetics in the preservation of anti-cancer immunity is obvious, but it is difficult to conclude that propofol can exert long-term benefits due to the small sample size. Dove 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8291825/ /pubmed/34295185 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S315360 Text en © 2021 Pang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Pang, Qian-Yun Duan, Li-Ping Jiang, Yan Liu, Hong-Liang Comparison of Outcomes After Breast Cancer Surgery Between Inhalational and Propofol-Based Intravenous Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Comparison of Outcomes After Breast Cancer Surgery Between Inhalational and Propofol-Based Intravenous Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Comparison of Outcomes After Breast Cancer Surgery Between Inhalational and Propofol-Based Intravenous Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Outcomes After Breast Cancer Surgery Between Inhalational and Propofol-Based Intravenous Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Outcomes After Breast Cancer Surgery Between Inhalational and Propofol-Based Intravenous Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Comparison of Outcomes After Breast Cancer Surgery Between Inhalational and Propofol-Based Intravenous Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | comparison of outcomes after breast cancer surgery between inhalational and propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8291825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295185 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S315360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pangqianyun comparisonofoutcomesafterbreastcancersurgerybetweeninhalationalandpropofolbasedintravenousanaesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT duanliping comparisonofoutcomesafterbreastcancersurgerybetweeninhalationalandpropofolbasedintravenousanaesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiangyan comparisonofoutcomesafterbreastcancersurgerybetweeninhalationalandpropofolbasedintravenousanaesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuhongliang comparisonofoutcomesafterbreastcancersurgerybetweeninhalationalandpropofolbasedintravenousanaesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |