Cargando…
Aspectos cognitivos, éticos, sociales y políticos en la evaluación de riesgos: a propósito de las vacunas contra el SARS-CoV-2
Risk is a concept that is usually evaluated by scientists and public health experts by comparing probabilities. However, this ethical utilitarian perspective, which considers that the best decision is the one that has less probability of harm than of benefit, does not consider normative aspects base...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SESPAS. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34420784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.06.007 |
_version_ | 1783724779414487040 |
---|---|
author | Novoa Jurado, Abel Jaime Abellán, José María |
author_facet | Novoa Jurado, Abel Jaime Abellán, José María |
author_sort | Novoa Jurado, Abel Jaime |
collection | PubMed |
description | Risk is a concept that is usually evaluated by scientists and public health experts by comparing probabilities. However, this ethical utilitarian perspective, which considers that the best decision is the one that has less probability of harm than of benefit, does not consider normative aspects based on other ethical perspectives. Interpreting the origin of public controversies arising from people's reactions to the small risks of attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and evaluating the responses of public institutions requires an understanding of both the cognitive aspects that introduce systematic biases in the assessment of probabilities and the sociological, ethical, and political framework that contextualizes risk management in modern societies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8292099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SESPAS. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82920992021-07-21 Aspectos cognitivos, éticos, sociales y políticos en la evaluación de riesgos: a propósito de las vacunas contra el SARS-CoV-2 Novoa Jurado, Abel Jaime Abellán, José María Gac Sanit Artículo Especial Risk is a concept that is usually evaluated by scientists and public health experts by comparing probabilities. However, this ethical utilitarian perspective, which considers that the best decision is the one that has less probability of harm than of benefit, does not consider normative aspects based on other ethical perspectives. Interpreting the origin of public controversies arising from people's reactions to the small risks of attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and evaluating the responses of public institutions requires an understanding of both the cognitive aspects that introduce systematic biases in the assessment of probabilities and the sociological, ethical, and political framework that contextualizes risk management in modern societies. SESPAS. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2022 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8292099/ /pubmed/34420784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.06.007 Text en © 2021 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Artículo Especial Novoa Jurado, Abel Jaime Abellán, José María Aspectos cognitivos, éticos, sociales y políticos en la evaluación de riesgos: a propósito de las vacunas contra el SARS-CoV-2 |
title | Aspectos cognitivos, éticos, sociales y políticos en la evaluación de riesgos: a propósito de las vacunas contra el SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full | Aspectos cognitivos, éticos, sociales y políticos en la evaluación de riesgos: a propósito de las vacunas contra el SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr | Aspectos cognitivos, éticos, sociales y políticos en la evaluación de riesgos: a propósito de las vacunas contra el SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Aspectos cognitivos, éticos, sociales y políticos en la evaluación de riesgos: a propósito de las vacunas contra el SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short | Aspectos cognitivos, éticos, sociales y políticos en la evaluación de riesgos: a propósito de las vacunas contra el SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort | aspectos cognitivos, éticos, sociales y políticos en la evaluación de riesgos: a propósito de las vacunas contra el sars-cov-2 |
topic | Artículo Especial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34420784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.06.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT novoajuradoabeljaime aspectoscognitivoseticossocialesypoliticosenlaevaluacionderiesgosapropositodelasvacunascontraelsarscov2 AT abellanjosemaria aspectoscognitivoseticossocialesypoliticosenlaevaluacionderiesgosapropositodelasvacunascontraelsarscov2 |