Cargando…

Reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in Sweden: a population based cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence and reasons for presenteeism in occupations in three branches defined as employees handling people, handling things or handling symbols. METHOD: A cross-sectional population-based cohort study was conducted. The study group was drawn from a representative sample...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marklund, Staffan, Gustafsson, Klas, Bergström, Gunnar, Leineweber, Constanze
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33914162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-021-01701-2
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence and reasons for presenteeism in occupations in three branches defined as employees handling people, handling things or handling symbols. METHOD: A cross-sectional population-based cohort study was conducted. The study group was drawn from a representative sample (n = 6230) aged 16–64, who had been interviewed in 2015 or in 2017 for the Swedish Work Environment Surveys (SWES). The odds ratios (ORs) stratified by occupational category for reasons of presenteeism, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were estimated using binomial multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study showed that presenteeism was more common among employees handling people (74%), when compared to employees handling things (65%) or handling symbols (70%). The most common reason for presenteeism among employees handling people was “I do not want to burden my colleagues”, while “Because nobody else can carry out my responsibilities” was most common in the other two categories. After control for socio-demography, work environments and health, the differences in reasons mostly remained significant between the three occupational categories. CONCLUSION: The differences between occupational categories are important for prevalence and reasons for presenteeism. As presenteeism affects the future health of employees and the productivity of the work unit, attempts to reduce presenteeism may be important. Because the reasons vary between occupations, customized preventive measures should be applied in different occupational settings. Among employees handling people, covering up for absence in work team is relevant, while among employees handling symbols and handling things the corresponding focus could be on shared responsibilities for specific tasks. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-021-01701-2.