Cargando…

Reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in Sweden: a population based cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence and reasons for presenteeism in occupations in three branches defined as employees handling people, handling things or handling symbols. METHOD: A cross-sectional population-based cohort study was conducted. The study group was drawn from a representative sample...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marklund, Staffan, Gustafsson, Klas, Bergström, Gunnar, Leineweber, Constanze
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33914162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-021-01701-2
_version_ 1783724793946701824
author Marklund, Staffan
Gustafsson, Klas
Bergström, Gunnar
Leineweber, Constanze
author_facet Marklund, Staffan
Gustafsson, Klas
Bergström, Gunnar
Leineweber, Constanze
author_sort Marklund, Staffan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence and reasons for presenteeism in occupations in three branches defined as employees handling people, handling things or handling symbols. METHOD: A cross-sectional population-based cohort study was conducted. The study group was drawn from a representative sample (n = 6230) aged 16–64, who had been interviewed in 2015 or in 2017 for the Swedish Work Environment Surveys (SWES). The odds ratios (ORs) stratified by occupational category for reasons of presenteeism, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were estimated using binomial multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study showed that presenteeism was more common among employees handling people (74%), when compared to employees handling things (65%) or handling symbols (70%). The most common reason for presenteeism among employees handling people was “I do not want to burden my colleagues”, while “Because nobody else can carry out my responsibilities” was most common in the other two categories. After control for socio-demography, work environments and health, the differences in reasons mostly remained significant between the three occupational categories. CONCLUSION: The differences between occupational categories are important for prevalence and reasons for presenteeism. As presenteeism affects the future health of employees and the productivity of the work unit, attempts to reduce presenteeism may be important. Because the reasons vary between occupations, customized preventive measures should be applied in different occupational settings. Among employees handling people, covering up for absence in work team is relevant, while among employees handling symbols and handling things the corresponding focus could be on shared responsibilities for specific tasks. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-021-01701-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8292261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82922612021-07-23 Reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in Sweden: a population based cross-sectional study Marklund, Staffan Gustafsson, Klas Bergström, Gunnar Leineweber, Constanze Int Arch Occup Environ Health Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence and reasons for presenteeism in occupations in three branches defined as employees handling people, handling things or handling symbols. METHOD: A cross-sectional population-based cohort study was conducted. The study group was drawn from a representative sample (n = 6230) aged 16–64, who had been interviewed in 2015 or in 2017 for the Swedish Work Environment Surveys (SWES). The odds ratios (ORs) stratified by occupational category for reasons of presenteeism, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were estimated using binomial multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study showed that presenteeism was more common among employees handling people (74%), when compared to employees handling things (65%) or handling symbols (70%). The most common reason for presenteeism among employees handling people was “I do not want to burden my colleagues”, while “Because nobody else can carry out my responsibilities” was most common in the other two categories. After control for socio-demography, work environments and health, the differences in reasons mostly remained significant between the three occupational categories. CONCLUSION: The differences between occupational categories are important for prevalence and reasons for presenteeism. As presenteeism affects the future health of employees and the productivity of the work unit, attempts to reduce presenteeism may be important. Because the reasons vary between occupations, customized preventive measures should be applied in different occupational settings. Among employees handling people, covering up for absence in work team is relevant, while among employees handling symbols and handling things the corresponding focus could be on shared responsibilities for specific tasks. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-021-01701-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8292261/ /pubmed/33914162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-021-01701-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Marklund, Staffan
Gustafsson, Klas
Bergström, Gunnar
Leineweber, Constanze
Reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in Sweden: a population based cross-sectional study
title Reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in Sweden: a population based cross-sectional study
title_full Reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in Sweden: a population based cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in Sweden: a population based cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in Sweden: a population based cross-sectional study
title_short Reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in Sweden: a population based cross-sectional study
title_sort reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in sweden: a population based cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33914162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-021-01701-2
work_keys_str_mv AT marklundstaffan reasonsforpresenteeismindifferentoccupationalbranchesinswedenapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT gustafssonklas reasonsforpresenteeismindifferentoccupationalbranchesinswedenapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT bergstromgunnar reasonsforpresenteeismindifferentoccupationalbranchesinswedenapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT leineweberconstanze reasonsforpresenteeismindifferentoccupationalbranchesinswedenapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy