Cargando…

Trends in inequalities in disability in Europe between 2002 and 2017

BACKGROUND: Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in population health is important in order to reduce them. We aim to determine if educational inequalities in Global Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI) disability have changed between 2002 and 2017 in Europe (26 countries). METHODS: We used logisti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rubio Valverde, Jose R, Mackenbach, Johan P, Nusselder, Wilma J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-216141
_version_ 1783724850437685248
author Rubio Valverde, Jose R
Mackenbach, Johan P
Nusselder, Wilma J
author_facet Rubio Valverde, Jose R
Mackenbach, Johan P
Nusselder, Wilma J
author_sort Rubio Valverde, Jose R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in population health is important in order to reduce them. We aim to determine if educational inequalities in Global Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI) disability have changed between 2002 and 2017 in Europe (26 countries). METHODS: We used logistic regression to quantify the annual change in disability prevalence by education, as well as the annual change in prevalence difference and ratio, both for the pooled sample and each country, as reported in the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) and the European Social Survey (ESS) for individuals aged 30–79 years. RESULTS: In EU-SILC, disability prevalence tended to decrease among the high educated. As a result, both the prevalence difference and the prevalence ratio between the low and high educated increased over time. There were no discernible trends in the ESS. However, there was substantial heterogeneity between countries in the magnitude and direction of these changes, but without clear geographical patterns and without consistency between surveys. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities in disability appear to have increased over time in Europe between 2002 and 2017 as per EU-SILC, and have persisted as measured by the ESS. Efforts to further harmonise disability instruments in international surveys are important, and so are studies to better understand international differences in disability trends and inequalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8292565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82925652021-08-05 Trends in inequalities in disability in Europe between 2002 and 2017 Rubio Valverde, Jose R Mackenbach, Johan P Nusselder, Wilma J J Epidemiol Community Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in population health is important in order to reduce them. We aim to determine if educational inequalities in Global Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI) disability have changed between 2002 and 2017 in Europe (26 countries). METHODS: We used logistic regression to quantify the annual change in disability prevalence by education, as well as the annual change in prevalence difference and ratio, both for the pooled sample and each country, as reported in the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) and the European Social Survey (ESS) for individuals aged 30–79 years. RESULTS: In EU-SILC, disability prevalence tended to decrease among the high educated. As a result, both the prevalence difference and the prevalence ratio between the low and high educated increased over time. There were no discernible trends in the ESS. However, there was substantial heterogeneity between countries in the magnitude and direction of these changes, but without clear geographical patterns and without consistency between surveys. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities in disability appear to have increased over time in Europe between 2002 and 2017 as per EU-SILC, and have persisted as measured by the ESS. Efforts to further harmonise disability instruments in international surveys are important, and so are studies to better understand international differences in disability trends and inequalities. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8292565/ /pubmed/33674458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-216141 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rubio Valverde, Jose R
Mackenbach, Johan P
Nusselder, Wilma J
Trends in inequalities in disability in Europe between 2002 and 2017
title Trends in inequalities in disability in Europe between 2002 and 2017
title_full Trends in inequalities in disability in Europe between 2002 and 2017
title_fullStr Trends in inequalities in disability in Europe between 2002 and 2017
title_full_unstemmed Trends in inequalities in disability in Europe between 2002 and 2017
title_short Trends in inequalities in disability in Europe between 2002 and 2017
title_sort trends in inequalities in disability in europe between 2002 and 2017
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-216141
work_keys_str_mv AT rubiovalverdejoser trendsininequalitiesindisabilityineuropebetween2002and2017
AT mackenbachjohanp trendsininequalitiesindisabilityineuropebetween2002and2017
AT nusselderwilmaj trendsininequalitiesindisabilityineuropebetween2002and2017