Cargando…

Heterogeneous distribution of tau pathology in the behavioural variant of Alzheimer’s disease

OBJECTIVE: The clinical phenotype of the rare behavioural variant of Alzheimer’s disease (bvAD) is insufficiently understood. Given the strong clinico-anatomical correlations of tau pathology in AD, we investigated the distribution of tau deposits in bvAD, in-vivo and ex-vivo, using positron emissio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singleton, Ellen, Hansson, Oskar, Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L., La Joie, Renaud, Mantyh, William G, Tideman, Pontus, Stomrud, Erik, Leuzy, Antoine, Johansson, Maurits, Strandberg, Olof, Smith, Ruben, Berendrecht, Evi, Miller, Bruce L, Iaccarino, Leonardo, Edwards, Lauren, Strom, Amelia, Wolters, Emma E, Coomans, Emma, Visser, Denise, Golla, Sandeep S V, Tuncel, Hayel, Bouwman, Femke, Van Swieten, John Cornelis, Papma, Janne M, van Berckel, Bart, Scheltens, Philip, Dijkstra, Anke A., Rabinovici, Gil D, Ossenkoppele, Rik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-325497
_version_ 1783724858127941632
author Singleton, Ellen
Hansson, Oskar
Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L.
La Joie, Renaud
Mantyh, William G
Tideman, Pontus
Stomrud, Erik
Leuzy, Antoine
Johansson, Maurits
Strandberg, Olof
Smith, Ruben
Berendrecht, Evi
Miller, Bruce L
Iaccarino, Leonardo
Edwards, Lauren
Strom, Amelia
Wolters, Emma E
Coomans, Emma
Visser, Denise
Golla, Sandeep S V
Tuncel, Hayel
Bouwman, Femke
Van Swieten, John Cornelis
Papma, Janne M
van Berckel, Bart
Scheltens, Philip
Dijkstra, Anke A.
Rabinovici, Gil D
Ossenkoppele, Rik
author_facet Singleton, Ellen
Hansson, Oskar
Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L.
La Joie, Renaud
Mantyh, William G
Tideman, Pontus
Stomrud, Erik
Leuzy, Antoine
Johansson, Maurits
Strandberg, Olof
Smith, Ruben
Berendrecht, Evi
Miller, Bruce L
Iaccarino, Leonardo
Edwards, Lauren
Strom, Amelia
Wolters, Emma E
Coomans, Emma
Visser, Denise
Golla, Sandeep S V
Tuncel, Hayel
Bouwman, Femke
Van Swieten, John Cornelis
Papma, Janne M
van Berckel, Bart
Scheltens, Philip
Dijkstra, Anke A.
Rabinovici, Gil D
Ossenkoppele, Rik
author_sort Singleton, Ellen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The clinical phenotype of the rare behavioural variant of Alzheimer’s disease (bvAD) is insufficiently understood. Given the strong clinico-anatomical correlations of tau pathology in AD, we investigated the distribution of tau deposits in bvAD, in-vivo and ex-vivo, using positron emission tomography (PET) and postmortem examination. METHODS: For the tau PET study, seven amyloid-β positive bvAD patients underwent [(18)F]flortaucipir or [(18)F]RO948 PET. We converted tau PET uptake values into standardised (W-)scores, adjusting for age, sex and mini mental state examination in a ‘typical’ memory-predominant AD (n=205) group. W-scores were computed within entorhinal, temporoparietal, medial and lateral prefrontal, insular and whole-brain regions-of-interest, frontal-to-entorhinal and frontal-to-parietal ratios and within intrinsic functional connectivity network templates. For the postmortem study, the percentage of AT8 (tau)-positive area in hippocampus CA1, temporal, parietal, frontal and insular cortices were compared between autopsy-confirmed patients with bvAD (n=8) and typical AD (tAD;n=7). RESULTS: Individual regional W-scores ≥1.96 (corresponding to p<0.05) were observed in three cases, that is, case #5: medial prefrontal cortex (W=2.13) and anterior default mode network (W=3.79), case #2: lateral prefrontal cortex (W=2.79) and salience network (W=2.77), and case #7: frontal-to-entorhinal ratio (W=2.04). The remaining four cases fell within the normal distributions of the tAD group. Postmortem AT8 staining indicated no group-level regional differences in phosphorylated tau levels between bvAD and tAD (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both in-vivo and ex-vivo, patients with bvAD showed heterogeneous distributions of tau pathology. Since key regions involved in behavioural regulation were not consistently disproportionally affected by tau pathology, other factors are more likely driving the clinical phenotype in bvAD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8292599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82925992021-08-05 Heterogeneous distribution of tau pathology in the behavioural variant of Alzheimer’s disease Singleton, Ellen Hansson, Oskar Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L. La Joie, Renaud Mantyh, William G Tideman, Pontus Stomrud, Erik Leuzy, Antoine Johansson, Maurits Strandberg, Olof Smith, Ruben Berendrecht, Evi Miller, Bruce L Iaccarino, Leonardo Edwards, Lauren Strom, Amelia Wolters, Emma E Coomans, Emma Visser, Denise Golla, Sandeep S V Tuncel, Hayel Bouwman, Femke Van Swieten, John Cornelis Papma, Janne M van Berckel, Bart Scheltens, Philip Dijkstra, Anke A. Rabinovici, Gil D Ossenkoppele, Rik J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Neurodegeneration OBJECTIVE: The clinical phenotype of the rare behavioural variant of Alzheimer’s disease (bvAD) is insufficiently understood. Given the strong clinico-anatomical correlations of tau pathology in AD, we investigated the distribution of tau deposits in bvAD, in-vivo and ex-vivo, using positron emission tomography (PET) and postmortem examination. METHODS: For the tau PET study, seven amyloid-β positive bvAD patients underwent [(18)F]flortaucipir or [(18)F]RO948 PET. We converted tau PET uptake values into standardised (W-)scores, adjusting for age, sex and mini mental state examination in a ‘typical’ memory-predominant AD (n=205) group. W-scores were computed within entorhinal, temporoparietal, medial and lateral prefrontal, insular and whole-brain regions-of-interest, frontal-to-entorhinal and frontal-to-parietal ratios and within intrinsic functional connectivity network templates. For the postmortem study, the percentage of AT8 (tau)-positive area in hippocampus CA1, temporal, parietal, frontal and insular cortices were compared between autopsy-confirmed patients with bvAD (n=8) and typical AD (tAD;n=7). RESULTS: Individual regional W-scores ≥1.96 (corresponding to p<0.05) were observed in three cases, that is, case #5: medial prefrontal cortex (W=2.13) and anterior default mode network (W=3.79), case #2: lateral prefrontal cortex (W=2.79) and salience network (W=2.77), and case #7: frontal-to-entorhinal ratio (W=2.04). The remaining four cases fell within the normal distributions of the tAD group. Postmortem AT8 staining indicated no group-level regional differences in phosphorylated tau levels between bvAD and tAD (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both in-vivo and ex-vivo, patients with bvAD showed heterogeneous distributions of tau pathology. Since key regions involved in behavioural regulation were not consistently disproportionally affected by tau pathology, other factors are more likely driving the clinical phenotype in bvAD. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8292599/ /pubmed/33850001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-325497 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Neurodegeneration
Singleton, Ellen
Hansson, Oskar
Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L.
La Joie, Renaud
Mantyh, William G
Tideman, Pontus
Stomrud, Erik
Leuzy, Antoine
Johansson, Maurits
Strandberg, Olof
Smith, Ruben
Berendrecht, Evi
Miller, Bruce L
Iaccarino, Leonardo
Edwards, Lauren
Strom, Amelia
Wolters, Emma E
Coomans, Emma
Visser, Denise
Golla, Sandeep S V
Tuncel, Hayel
Bouwman, Femke
Van Swieten, John Cornelis
Papma, Janne M
van Berckel, Bart
Scheltens, Philip
Dijkstra, Anke A.
Rabinovici, Gil D
Ossenkoppele, Rik
Heterogeneous distribution of tau pathology in the behavioural variant of Alzheimer’s disease
title Heterogeneous distribution of tau pathology in the behavioural variant of Alzheimer’s disease
title_full Heterogeneous distribution of tau pathology in the behavioural variant of Alzheimer’s disease
title_fullStr Heterogeneous distribution of tau pathology in the behavioural variant of Alzheimer’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneous distribution of tau pathology in the behavioural variant of Alzheimer’s disease
title_short Heterogeneous distribution of tau pathology in the behavioural variant of Alzheimer’s disease
title_sort heterogeneous distribution of tau pathology in the behavioural variant of alzheimer’s disease
topic Neurodegeneration
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-325497
work_keys_str_mv AT singletonellen heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT hanssonoskar heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT pijnenburgyolandeal heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT lajoierenaud heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT mantyhwilliamg heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT tidemanpontus heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT stomruderik heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT leuzyantoine heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT johanssonmaurits heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT strandbergolof heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT smithruben heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT berendrechtevi heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT millerbrucel heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT iaccarinoleonardo heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT edwardslauren heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT stromamelia heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT woltersemmae heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT coomansemma heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT visserdenise heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT gollasandeepsv heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT tuncelhayel heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT bouwmanfemke heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT vanswietenjohncornelis heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT papmajannem heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT vanberckelbart heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT scheltensphilip heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT dijkstraankea heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT rabinovicigild heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease
AT ossenkoppelerik heterogeneousdistributionoftaupathologyinthebehaviouralvariantofalzheimersdisease