Cargando…

Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters

Designing an economically viable catalyst that maintains high catalytic activity and stability is the key to unlock dry reforming of methane (DRM) as a primary strategy for biogas valorization. Ni/Al(2)O(3) catalysts have been widely used for this purpose; however, several modifications have been re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Álvarez Moreno, Andrea, Ramirez-Reina, Tomás, Ivanova, Svetlana, Roger, Anne-Cécile, Centeno, Miguel Ángel, Odriozola, José Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307298
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.694976
_version_ 1783724872036253696
author Álvarez Moreno, Andrea
Ramirez-Reina, Tomás
Ivanova, Svetlana
Roger, Anne-Cécile
Centeno, Miguel Ángel
Odriozola, José Antonio
author_facet Álvarez Moreno, Andrea
Ramirez-Reina, Tomás
Ivanova, Svetlana
Roger, Anne-Cécile
Centeno, Miguel Ángel
Odriozola, José Antonio
author_sort Álvarez Moreno, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Designing an economically viable catalyst that maintains high catalytic activity and stability is the key to unlock dry reforming of methane (DRM) as a primary strategy for biogas valorization. Ni/Al(2)O(3) catalysts have been widely used for this purpose; however, several modifications have been reported in the last years in order to prevent coke deposition and deactivation of the samples. Modification of the acidity of the support and the addition of noble metal promoters are between the most reported strategies. Nevertheless, in the task of designing an active and stable catalyst for DRM, the selection of an appropriate noble metal promoter is turning more challenging owing to the lack of homogeneity of the different studies. Therefore, this research aims to compare Ru (0.50 and 2.0%) and Re (0.50 and 2.0%) as noble metal promoters for a Ni/MgAl(2)O(4) catalyst under the same synthesis and reaction conditions. Catalysts were characterized by XRF, BET, XRD, TPR, hydrogen chemisorption (H(2)-TPD), and dry reforming reaction tests. Results show that both promoters increase Ni reducibility and dispersion. However, Ru seems a better promoter for DRM since 0.50% of Ru increases the catalytic activity in 10% and leads to less coke deposition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8292677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82926772021-07-22 Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters Álvarez Moreno, Andrea Ramirez-Reina, Tomás Ivanova, Svetlana Roger, Anne-Cécile Centeno, Miguel Ángel Odriozola, José Antonio Front Chem Chemistry Designing an economically viable catalyst that maintains high catalytic activity and stability is the key to unlock dry reforming of methane (DRM) as a primary strategy for biogas valorization. Ni/Al(2)O(3) catalysts have been widely used for this purpose; however, several modifications have been reported in the last years in order to prevent coke deposition and deactivation of the samples. Modification of the acidity of the support and the addition of noble metal promoters are between the most reported strategies. Nevertheless, in the task of designing an active and stable catalyst for DRM, the selection of an appropriate noble metal promoter is turning more challenging owing to the lack of homogeneity of the different studies. Therefore, this research aims to compare Ru (0.50 and 2.0%) and Re (0.50 and 2.0%) as noble metal promoters for a Ni/MgAl(2)O(4) catalyst under the same synthesis and reaction conditions. Catalysts were characterized by XRF, BET, XRD, TPR, hydrogen chemisorption (H(2)-TPD), and dry reforming reaction tests. Results show that both promoters increase Ni reducibility and dispersion. However, Ru seems a better promoter for DRM since 0.50% of Ru increases the catalytic activity in 10% and leads to less coke deposition. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8292677/ /pubmed/34307298 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.694976 Text en Copyright © 2021 Álvarez Moreno, Ramirez-Reina, Ivanova, Roger, Centeno and Odriozola. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Chemistry
Álvarez Moreno, Andrea
Ramirez-Reina, Tomás
Ivanova, Svetlana
Roger, Anne-Cécile
Centeno, Miguel Ángel
Odriozola, José Antonio
Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
title Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
title_full Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
title_fullStr Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
title_full_unstemmed Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
title_short Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
title_sort bimetallic ni–ru and ni–re catalysts for dry reforming of methane: understanding the synergies of the selected promoters
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307298
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.694976
work_keys_str_mv AT alvarezmorenoandrea bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
AT ramirezreinatomas bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
AT ivanovasvetlana bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
AT rogerannececile bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
AT centenomiguelangel bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
AT odriozolajoseantonio bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters