Cargando…
Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks
PURPOSE: Medical physicists use a suitable detector connected to an electrometer to measure radiotherapy beams. Each detector and electrometer has a lifetime (due to physical deterioration of detector components and electrical characteristic deterioration in electronic electrometer components), long...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34085364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13312 |
_version_ | 1783724875656986624 |
---|---|
author | Kinoshita, Naoki Oguchi, Hiroshi Shimizu, Morihito Kidoya, Eiji Shioura, Hiroki Kimura, Hirohiko |
author_facet | Kinoshita, Naoki Oguchi, Hiroshi Shimizu, Morihito Kidoya, Eiji Shioura, Hiroki Kimura, Hirohiko |
author_sort | Kinoshita, Naoki |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Medical physicists use a suitable detector connected to an electrometer to measure radiotherapy beams. Each detector and electrometer has a lifetime (due to physical deterioration of detector components and electrical characteristic deterioration in electronic electrometer components), long‐term stability [according to IEC 60731:2011, ≤0.5% (reference‐class dosimeter)], and calibration frequency [according to Muir et al. (J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017; 18:182‐190), generally 2 years]; thus, physicists should check the electrometer and detector separately. However, to the best of our knowledge, only one study (Blad et al., Phys Med Biol. 1998; 43:2385–2391) has reported checking the electrometer independently from the detector. The present study conducts performance checks on electrometers separately from the detector in clinical settings, using an electrometer equipped with a direct current (DC) generator (EMF 521R) capable of injecting DC (effective range: ±20 pA to ±20 nA) into itself or another electrometer. METHODS: First, to check the nonlinearity of the generated currents from ±20 pA to ±20 nA, charges generated from the DC generator were measured with the EMF 521R electrometer. Next, six reference‐class electrometers classified according to IEC 60731:2011 were checked for repeatability at a current of ±20 pA or a minimum effective indicated value meeting IEC 60731:2011, as well as for nonlinearity within the current range from ±20 pA to ±20 nA. RESULTS: The nonlinearities for the measured currents were less than ±0.05%. The repeatability for the six electrometers was < 0.1%. While the nonlinearity of one electrometer reached up to 0.22% at a current of –20 pA, all six electrometers displayed nonlinearities of less than ±0.1% at currents of ±100 pA or higher. CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests that it is possible to check the nonlinearity and repeatability of clinical electrometers with DCs above the ±30 pA level using a DC generator in a clinic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8292692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82926922021-07-22 Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks Kinoshita, Naoki Oguchi, Hiroshi Shimizu, Morihito Kidoya, Eiji Shioura, Hiroki Kimura, Hirohiko J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements PURPOSE: Medical physicists use a suitable detector connected to an electrometer to measure radiotherapy beams. Each detector and electrometer has a lifetime (due to physical deterioration of detector components and electrical characteristic deterioration in electronic electrometer components), long‐term stability [according to IEC 60731:2011, ≤0.5% (reference‐class dosimeter)], and calibration frequency [according to Muir et al. (J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017; 18:182‐190), generally 2 years]; thus, physicists should check the electrometer and detector separately. However, to the best of our knowledge, only one study (Blad et al., Phys Med Biol. 1998; 43:2385–2391) has reported checking the electrometer independently from the detector. The present study conducts performance checks on electrometers separately from the detector in clinical settings, using an electrometer equipped with a direct current (DC) generator (EMF 521R) capable of injecting DC (effective range: ±20 pA to ±20 nA) into itself or another electrometer. METHODS: First, to check the nonlinearity of the generated currents from ±20 pA to ±20 nA, charges generated from the DC generator were measured with the EMF 521R electrometer. Next, six reference‐class electrometers classified according to IEC 60731:2011 were checked for repeatability at a current of ±20 pA or a minimum effective indicated value meeting IEC 60731:2011, as well as for nonlinearity within the current range from ±20 pA to ±20 nA. RESULTS: The nonlinearities for the measured currents were less than ±0.05%. The repeatability for the six electrometers was < 0.1%. While the nonlinearity of one electrometer reached up to 0.22% at a current of –20 pA, all six electrometers displayed nonlinearities of less than ±0.1% at currents of ±100 pA or higher. CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests that it is possible to check the nonlinearity and repeatability of clinical electrometers with DCs above the ±30 pA level using a DC generator in a clinic. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8292692/ /pubmed/34085364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13312 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Measurements Kinoshita, Naoki Oguchi, Hiroshi Shimizu, Morihito Kidoya, Eiji Shioura, Hiroki Kimura, Hirohiko Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks |
title | Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks |
title_full | Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks |
title_fullStr | Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks |
title_short | Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks |
title_sort | examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks |
topic | Radiation Measurements |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34085364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kinoshitanaoki examiningelectrometerperformancecheckswithdirectcurrentgeneratorinaclinicassessmentofgeneratedchargesandimplementationofelectrometerchecks AT oguchihiroshi examiningelectrometerperformancecheckswithdirectcurrentgeneratorinaclinicassessmentofgeneratedchargesandimplementationofelectrometerchecks AT shimizumorihito examiningelectrometerperformancecheckswithdirectcurrentgeneratorinaclinicassessmentofgeneratedchargesandimplementationofelectrometerchecks AT kidoyaeiji examiningelectrometerperformancecheckswithdirectcurrentgeneratorinaclinicassessmentofgeneratedchargesandimplementationofelectrometerchecks AT shiourahiroki examiningelectrometerperformancecheckswithdirectcurrentgeneratorinaclinicassessmentofgeneratedchargesandimplementationofelectrometerchecks AT kimurahirohiko examiningelectrometerperformancecheckswithdirectcurrentgeneratorinaclinicassessmentofgeneratedchargesandimplementationofelectrometerchecks |