Cargando…

Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks

PURPOSE: Medical physicists use a suitable detector connected to an electrometer to measure radiotherapy beams. Each detector and electrometer has a lifetime (due to physical deterioration of detector components and electrical characteristic deterioration in electronic electrometer components), long...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinoshita, Naoki, Oguchi, Hiroshi, Shimizu, Morihito, Kidoya, Eiji, Shioura, Hiroki, Kimura, Hirohiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34085364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13312
_version_ 1783724875656986624
author Kinoshita, Naoki
Oguchi, Hiroshi
Shimizu, Morihito
Kidoya, Eiji
Shioura, Hiroki
Kimura, Hirohiko
author_facet Kinoshita, Naoki
Oguchi, Hiroshi
Shimizu, Morihito
Kidoya, Eiji
Shioura, Hiroki
Kimura, Hirohiko
author_sort Kinoshita, Naoki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Medical physicists use a suitable detector connected to an electrometer to measure radiotherapy beams. Each detector and electrometer has a lifetime (due to physical deterioration of detector components and electrical characteristic deterioration in electronic electrometer components), long‐term stability [according to IEC 60731:2011, ≤0.5% (reference‐class dosimeter)], and calibration frequency [according to Muir et al. (J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017; 18:182‐190), generally 2 years]; thus, physicists should check the electrometer and detector separately. However, to the best of our knowledge, only one study (Blad et al., Phys Med Biol. 1998; 43:2385–2391) has reported checking the electrometer independently from the detector. The present study conducts performance checks on electrometers separately from the detector in clinical settings, using an electrometer equipped with a direct current (DC) generator (EMF 521R) capable of injecting DC (effective range: ±20 pA to ±20 nA) into itself or another electrometer. METHODS: First, to check the nonlinearity of the generated currents from ±20 pA to ±20 nA, charges generated from the DC generator were measured with the EMF 521R electrometer. Next, six reference‐class electrometers classified according to IEC 60731:2011 were checked for repeatability at a current of ±20 pA or a minimum effective indicated value meeting IEC 60731:2011, as well as for nonlinearity within the current range from ±20 pA to ±20 nA. RESULTS: The nonlinearities for the measured currents were less than ±0.05%. The repeatability for the six electrometers was < 0.1%. While the nonlinearity of one electrometer reached up to 0.22% at a current of –20 pA, all six electrometers displayed nonlinearities of less than ±0.1% at currents of ±100 pA or higher. CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests that it is possible to check the nonlinearity and repeatability of clinical electrometers with DCs above the ±30 pA level using a DC generator in a clinic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8292692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82926922021-07-22 Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks Kinoshita, Naoki Oguchi, Hiroshi Shimizu, Morihito Kidoya, Eiji Shioura, Hiroki Kimura, Hirohiko J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements PURPOSE: Medical physicists use a suitable detector connected to an electrometer to measure radiotherapy beams. Each detector and electrometer has a lifetime (due to physical deterioration of detector components and electrical characteristic deterioration in electronic electrometer components), long‐term stability [according to IEC 60731:2011, ≤0.5% (reference‐class dosimeter)], and calibration frequency [according to Muir et al. (J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017; 18:182‐190), generally 2 years]; thus, physicists should check the electrometer and detector separately. However, to the best of our knowledge, only one study (Blad et al., Phys Med Biol. 1998; 43:2385–2391) has reported checking the electrometer independently from the detector. The present study conducts performance checks on electrometers separately from the detector in clinical settings, using an electrometer equipped with a direct current (DC) generator (EMF 521R) capable of injecting DC (effective range: ±20 pA to ±20 nA) into itself or another electrometer. METHODS: First, to check the nonlinearity of the generated currents from ±20 pA to ±20 nA, charges generated from the DC generator were measured with the EMF 521R electrometer. Next, six reference‐class electrometers classified according to IEC 60731:2011 were checked for repeatability at a current of ±20 pA or a minimum effective indicated value meeting IEC 60731:2011, as well as for nonlinearity within the current range from ±20 pA to ±20 nA. RESULTS: The nonlinearities for the measured currents were less than ±0.05%. The repeatability for the six electrometers was < 0.1%. While the nonlinearity of one electrometer reached up to 0.22% at a current of –20 pA, all six electrometers displayed nonlinearities of less than ±0.1% at currents of ±100 pA or higher. CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests that it is possible to check the nonlinearity and repeatability of clinical electrometers with DCs above the ±30 pA level using a DC generator in a clinic. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8292692/ /pubmed/34085364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13312 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
Kinoshita, Naoki
Oguchi, Hiroshi
Shimizu, Morihito
Kidoya, Eiji
Shioura, Hiroki
Kimura, Hirohiko
Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks
title Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks
title_full Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks
title_fullStr Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks
title_full_unstemmed Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks
title_short Examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks
title_sort examining electrometer performance checks with direct‐current generator in a clinic: assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34085364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13312
work_keys_str_mv AT kinoshitanaoki examiningelectrometerperformancecheckswithdirectcurrentgeneratorinaclinicassessmentofgeneratedchargesandimplementationofelectrometerchecks
AT oguchihiroshi examiningelectrometerperformancecheckswithdirectcurrentgeneratorinaclinicassessmentofgeneratedchargesandimplementationofelectrometerchecks
AT shimizumorihito examiningelectrometerperformancecheckswithdirectcurrentgeneratorinaclinicassessmentofgeneratedchargesandimplementationofelectrometerchecks
AT kidoyaeiji examiningelectrometerperformancecheckswithdirectcurrentgeneratorinaclinicassessmentofgeneratedchargesandimplementationofelectrometerchecks
AT shiourahiroki examiningelectrometerperformancecheckswithdirectcurrentgeneratorinaclinicassessmentofgeneratedchargesandimplementationofelectrometerchecks
AT kimurahirohiko examiningelectrometerperformancecheckswithdirectcurrentgeneratorinaclinicassessmentofgeneratedchargesandimplementationofelectrometerchecks