Cargando…

Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols

PURPOSE: Each radiotherapy center should have a site‐specific planning target volume (PTV) margins and image‐guided (IG) radiotherapy (IGRT) correction protocols to compensate for the geometric errors that can occur during treatment. This study developed an automated algorithm for the calculation an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abubakar, Auwal, Zamri, Nada Alia M., Shaukat, Shazril Imran, Mohd Zin, Hafiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34109736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13291
_version_ 1783724878746091520
author Abubakar, Auwal
Zamri, Nada Alia M.
Shaukat, Shazril Imran
Mohd Zin, Hafiz
author_facet Abubakar, Auwal
Zamri, Nada Alia M.
Shaukat, Shazril Imran
Mohd Zin, Hafiz
author_sort Abubakar, Auwal
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Each radiotherapy center should have a site‐specific planning target volume (PTV) margins and image‐guided (IG) radiotherapy (IGRT) correction protocols to compensate for the geometric errors that can occur during treatment. This study developed an automated algorithm for the calculation and evaluation of these parameters from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)‐based IG‐intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG‐IMRT) treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A MATLAB algorithm was developed to extract the setup errors in three translational directions (x, y, and z) from the data logged by the CBCT system during treatment delivery. The algorithm also calculates the resulted population setup error and PTV margin based on the van Herk margin recipe and subsequently estimates their respective values for no action level (NAL) and extended no action level (eNAL) offline correction protocols. The algorithm was tested on 25 head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated using IG‐IMRT. RESULTS: The algorithms calculated that the HNC patients require a PTV margin of 3.1, 2.7, and 3.2 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, without IGRT. The margin can be reduced to 2.0, 2.2, and 3.0 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, with NAL and 1.6, 1.7, and 2.2 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, with eNAL protocol. The results obtained were verified to be the same with the margins calculated using an Excel spreadsheet. The algorithm calculates the weekly offline setup error correction values automatically and reduces the risk of input data error observed in the spreadsheet. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the algorithm provides an automated method for optimization and reduction of PTV margin using logged setup errors from CBCT‐based IGRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8292705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82927052021-07-22 Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols Abubakar, Auwal Zamri, Nada Alia M. Shaukat, Shazril Imran Mohd Zin, Hafiz J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Each radiotherapy center should have a site‐specific planning target volume (PTV) margins and image‐guided (IG) radiotherapy (IGRT) correction protocols to compensate for the geometric errors that can occur during treatment. This study developed an automated algorithm for the calculation and evaluation of these parameters from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)‐based IG‐intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG‐IMRT) treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A MATLAB algorithm was developed to extract the setup errors in three translational directions (x, y, and z) from the data logged by the CBCT system during treatment delivery. The algorithm also calculates the resulted population setup error and PTV margin based on the van Herk margin recipe and subsequently estimates their respective values for no action level (NAL) and extended no action level (eNAL) offline correction protocols. The algorithm was tested on 25 head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated using IG‐IMRT. RESULTS: The algorithms calculated that the HNC patients require a PTV margin of 3.1, 2.7, and 3.2 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, without IGRT. The margin can be reduced to 2.0, 2.2, and 3.0 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, with NAL and 1.6, 1.7, and 2.2 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, with eNAL protocol. The results obtained were verified to be the same with the margins calculated using an Excel spreadsheet. The algorithm calculates the weekly offline setup error correction values automatically and reduces the risk of input data error observed in the spreadsheet. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the algorithm provides an automated method for optimization and reduction of PTV margin using logged setup errors from CBCT‐based IGRT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8292705/ /pubmed/34109736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13291 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Abubakar, Auwal
Zamri, Nada Alia M.
Shaukat, Shazril Imran
Mohd Zin, Hafiz
Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols
title Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols
title_full Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols
title_fullStr Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols
title_full_unstemmed Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols
title_short Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols
title_sort automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34109736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13291
work_keys_str_mv AT abubakarauwal automatedalgorithmforcalculationofsetupcorrectionsandplanningtargetvolumemarginsforofflineimageguidedradiotherapyprotocols
AT zamrinadaaliam automatedalgorithmforcalculationofsetupcorrectionsandplanningtargetvolumemarginsforofflineimageguidedradiotherapyprotocols
AT shaukatshazrilimran automatedalgorithmforcalculationofsetupcorrectionsandplanningtargetvolumemarginsforofflineimageguidedradiotherapyprotocols
AT mohdzinhafiz automatedalgorithmforcalculationofsetupcorrectionsandplanningtargetvolumemarginsforofflineimageguidedradiotherapyprotocols