Cargando…
Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols
PURPOSE: Each radiotherapy center should have a site‐specific planning target volume (PTV) margins and image‐guided (IG) radiotherapy (IGRT) correction protocols to compensate for the geometric errors that can occur during treatment. This study developed an automated algorithm for the calculation an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34109736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13291 |
_version_ | 1783724878746091520 |
---|---|
author | Abubakar, Auwal Zamri, Nada Alia M. Shaukat, Shazril Imran Mohd Zin, Hafiz |
author_facet | Abubakar, Auwal Zamri, Nada Alia M. Shaukat, Shazril Imran Mohd Zin, Hafiz |
author_sort | Abubakar, Auwal |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Each radiotherapy center should have a site‐specific planning target volume (PTV) margins and image‐guided (IG) radiotherapy (IGRT) correction protocols to compensate for the geometric errors that can occur during treatment. This study developed an automated algorithm for the calculation and evaluation of these parameters from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)‐based IG‐intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG‐IMRT) treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A MATLAB algorithm was developed to extract the setup errors in three translational directions (x, y, and z) from the data logged by the CBCT system during treatment delivery. The algorithm also calculates the resulted population setup error and PTV margin based on the van Herk margin recipe and subsequently estimates their respective values for no action level (NAL) and extended no action level (eNAL) offline correction protocols. The algorithm was tested on 25 head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated using IG‐IMRT. RESULTS: The algorithms calculated that the HNC patients require a PTV margin of 3.1, 2.7, and 3.2 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, without IGRT. The margin can be reduced to 2.0, 2.2, and 3.0 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, with NAL and 1.6, 1.7, and 2.2 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, with eNAL protocol. The results obtained were verified to be the same with the margins calculated using an Excel spreadsheet. The algorithm calculates the weekly offline setup error correction values automatically and reduces the risk of input data error observed in the spreadsheet. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the algorithm provides an automated method for optimization and reduction of PTV margin using logged setup errors from CBCT‐based IGRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8292705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82927052021-07-22 Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols Abubakar, Auwal Zamri, Nada Alia M. Shaukat, Shazril Imran Mohd Zin, Hafiz J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Each radiotherapy center should have a site‐specific planning target volume (PTV) margins and image‐guided (IG) radiotherapy (IGRT) correction protocols to compensate for the geometric errors that can occur during treatment. This study developed an automated algorithm for the calculation and evaluation of these parameters from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)‐based IG‐intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG‐IMRT) treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A MATLAB algorithm was developed to extract the setup errors in three translational directions (x, y, and z) from the data logged by the CBCT system during treatment delivery. The algorithm also calculates the resulted population setup error and PTV margin based on the van Herk margin recipe and subsequently estimates their respective values for no action level (NAL) and extended no action level (eNAL) offline correction protocols. The algorithm was tested on 25 head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated using IG‐IMRT. RESULTS: The algorithms calculated that the HNC patients require a PTV margin of 3.1, 2.7, and 3.2 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, without IGRT. The margin can be reduced to 2.0, 2.2, and 3.0 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, with NAL and 1.6, 1.7, and 2.2 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, with eNAL protocol. The results obtained were verified to be the same with the margins calculated using an Excel spreadsheet. The algorithm calculates the weekly offline setup error correction values automatically and reduces the risk of input data error observed in the spreadsheet. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the algorithm provides an automated method for optimization and reduction of PTV margin using logged setup errors from CBCT‐based IGRT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8292705/ /pubmed/34109736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13291 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Abubakar, Auwal Zamri, Nada Alia M. Shaukat, Shazril Imran Mohd Zin, Hafiz Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols |
title | Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols |
title_full | Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols |
title_fullStr | Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols |
title_short | Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols |
title_sort | automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image‐guided radiotherapy protocols |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34109736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13291 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abubakarauwal automatedalgorithmforcalculationofsetupcorrectionsandplanningtargetvolumemarginsforofflineimageguidedradiotherapyprotocols AT zamrinadaaliam automatedalgorithmforcalculationofsetupcorrectionsandplanningtargetvolumemarginsforofflineimageguidedradiotherapyprotocols AT shaukatshazrilimran automatedalgorithmforcalculationofsetupcorrectionsandplanningtargetvolumemarginsforofflineimageguidedradiotherapyprotocols AT mohdzinhafiz automatedalgorithmforcalculationofsetupcorrectionsandplanningtargetvolumemarginsforofflineimageguidedradiotherapyprotocols |