Cargando…

Reporting of adverse events, conflict of interest and funding in randomised controlled trials of antibiotics: a secondary analysis

OBJECTIVES: Transparent reporting of trials is necessary to assess their internal and external validity. Currently, little is known about the quality of reporting in antibiotics trials. Our study investigates the reporting of adverse events, conflicts of interest and funding information in trials of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakhit, Mina, Jones, Mark, Baker, Jenalle, Nair, Ramil, Yan, Kylie, Del Mar, Chris, Scott, Anna Mae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045406
_version_ 1783724895882969088
author Bakhit, Mina
Jones, Mark
Baker, Jenalle
Nair, Ramil
Yan, Kylie
Del Mar, Chris
Scott, Anna Mae
author_facet Bakhit, Mina
Jones, Mark
Baker, Jenalle
Nair, Ramil
Yan, Kylie
Del Mar, Chris
Scott, Anna Mae
author_sort Bakhit, Mina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Transparent reporting of trials is necessary to assess their internal and external validity. Currently, little is known about the quality of reporting in antibiotics trials. Our study investigates the reporting of adverse events, conflicts of interest and funding information in trials of penicillins, cephalosporins and macrolides. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of trials included in a convenience sample of three systematic reviews. METHODS: All randomised controlled trials included in the systematic reviews were included, although duplicates were removed. Eligible trials compared the specified antibiotics to placebo, for any indication. Author pairs independently extracted the data on reporting of adverse events from parent reviews, and data on funding and conflict of interest information from the trial reports. We calculated the overall proportion of trials reporting adverse events, conflict of interest information and funding information, and their proportion before and after the publication of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2001 Statement. RESULTS: We included 432 trials. Overall, 62% of trials reported adverse events of any kind, although reporting of deaths or antibiotic resistance was less frequent (20% and 37%, respectively). Conflict-of-interest information was provided in 26% of the trials, and funding information was provided in 66% of the trials. There was no significant difference in reporting of adverse events before and after the publication of CONSORT 2001 Statement (62% vs 62%, p=0.92). Conflict of interest statements were provided more frequently (2% vs 55%, p<0.001) and conflict was present more often (0% vs 14%, p<0.001). There was no difference in the provision of the information about trial funding before (62%) and after (70%) CONSORT 2001 publication. CONCLUSIONS: Information about adverse events, conflict of interest and funding, remains under-reported in trials of antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8292799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82927992021-08-05 Reporting of adverse events, conflict of interest and funding in randomised controlled trials of antibiotics: a secondary analysis Bakhit, Mina Jones, Mark Baker, Jenalle Nair, Ramil Yan, Kylie Del Mar, Chris Scott, Anna Mae BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Transparent reporting of trials is necessary to assess their internal and external validity. Currently, little is known about the quality of reporting in antibiotics trials. Our study investigates the reporting of adverse events, conflicts of interest and funding information in trials of penicillins, cephalosporins and macrolides. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of trials included in a convenience sample of three systematic reviews. METHODS: All randomised controlled trials included in the systematic reviews were included, although duplicates were removed. Eligible trials compared the specified antibiotics to placebo, for any indication. Author pairs independently extracted the data on reporting of adverse events from parent reviews, and data on funding and conflict of interest information from the trial reports. We calculated the overall proportion of trials reporting adverse events, conflict of interest information and funding information, and their proportion before and after the publication of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2001 Statement. RESULTS: We included 432 trials. Overall, 62% of trials reported adverse events of any kind, although reporting of deaths or antibiotic resistance was less frequent (20% and 37%, respectively). Conflict-of-interest information was provided in 26% of the trials, and funding information was provided in 66% of the trials. There was no significant difference in reporting of adverse events before and after the publication of CONSORT 2001 Statement (62% vs 62%, p=0.92). Conflict of interest statements were provided more frequently (2% vs 55%, p<0.001) and conflict was present more often (0% vs 14%, p<0.001). There was no difference in the provision of the information about trial funding before (62%) and after (70%) CONSORT 2001 publication. CONCLUSIONS: Information about adverse events, conflict of interest and funding, remains under-reported in trials of antibiotics. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8292799/ /pubmed/34285004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045406 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Bakhit, Mina
Jones, Mark
Baker, Jenalle
Nair, Ramil
Yan, Kylie
Del Mar, Chris
Scott, Anna Mae
Reporting of adverse events, conflict of interest and funding in randomised controlled trials of antibiotics: a secondary analysis
title Reporting of adverse events, conflict of interest and funding in randomised controlled trials of antibiotics: a secondary analysis
title_full Reporting of adverse events, conflict of interest and funding in randomised controlled trials of antibiotics: a secondary analysis
title_fullStr Reporting of adverse events, conflict of interest and funding in randomised controlled trials of antibiotics: a secondary analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reporting of adverse events, conflict of interest and funding in randomised controlled trials of antibiotics: a secondary analysis
title_short Reporting of adverse events, conflict of interest and funding in randomised controlled trials of antibiotics: a secondary analysis
title_sort reporting of adverse events, conflict of interest and funding in randomised controlled trials of antibiotics: a secondary analysis
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8292799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045406
work_keys_str_mv AT bakhitmina reportingofadverseeventsconflictofinterestandfundinginrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofantibioticsasecondaryanalysis
AT jonesmark reportingofadverseeventsconflictofinterestandfundinginrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofantibioticsasecondaryanalysis
AT bakerjenalle reportingofadverseeventsconflictofinterestandfundinginrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofantibioticsasecondaryanalysis
AT nairramil reportingofadverseeventsconflictofinterestandfundinginrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofantibioticsasecondaryanalysis
AT yankylie reportingofadverseeventsconflictofinterestandfundinginrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofantibioticsasecondaryanalysis
AT delmarchris reportingofadverseeventsconflictofinterestandfundinginrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofantibioticsasecondaryanalysis
AT scottannamae reportingofadverseeventsconflictofinterestandfundinginrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofantibioticsasecondaryanalysis