Cargando…

Principles of Genomic Newborn Screening Programs: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE: Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) may optimize the health and well-being of children and families. Screening programs are required to be evidence based, acceptable, and beneficial. OBJECTIVES: To identify what has been discovered following the reporting of the first gNBS pilot projects an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Downie, Lilian, Halliday, Jane, Lewis, Sharon, Amor, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34283230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14336
_version_ 1783724939448156160
author Downie, Lilian
Halliday, Jane
Lewis, Sharon
Amor, David J.
author_facet Downie, Lilian
Halliday, Jane
Lewis, Sharon
Amor, David J.
author_sort Downie, Lilian
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) may optimize the health and well-being of children and families. Screening programs are required to be evidence based, acceptable, and beneficial. OBJECTIVES: To identify what has been discovered following the reporting of the first gNBS pilot projects and to provide a summary of key points for the design of gNBS. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic literature review was performed on April 14, 2021, identifying 36 articles that addressed the following questions: (1) what is the interest in and what would be the uptake of gNBS? (2) what diseases and genes should be included? (3) what is the validity and utility of gNBS? and (4) what are the ethical, legal, and social implications? Articles were only included if they generated new evidence; all opinion pieces were excluded. FINDINGS: In the 36 articles included, there was high concordance, except for gene disease inclusion, which was highly variable. Key findings were the need for equitable access, appropriate educational materials, and informed and flexible consent. The process for selecting genes for testing should be transparent and reflect that parents value the certainty of prediction over actionability. Data should be analyzed in a way that minimizes uncertainty and incidental findings. The expansion of traditional newborn screening (tNBS) to identify more life-threatening and treatable diseases needs to be balanced against the complexity of consenting parents of newborns for genomic testing as well as the risk that overall uptake of tNBS may decline. The literature reflected that the right of a child to self-determination should be valued more than the possibility of the whole family benefiting from a newborn genomic test. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this systematic review suggest that implementing gNBS will require a nuanced approach. There are gaps in our knowledge, such as the views of diverse populations, the capabilities of health systems, and health economic implications. It will be essential to rigorously evaluate outcomes and ensure programs can evolve to maximize benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8293022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82930222021-08-17 Principles of Genomic Newborn Screening Programs: A Systematic Review Downie, Lilian Halliday, Jane Lewis, Sharon Amor, David J. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) may optimize the health and well-being of children and families. Screening programs are required to be evidence based, acceptable, and beneficial. OBJECTIVES: To identify what has been discovered following the reporting of the first gNBS pilot projects and to provide a summary of key points for the design of gNBS. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic literature review was performed on April 14, 2021, identifying 36 articles that addressed the following questions: (1) what is the interest in and what would be the uptake of gNBS? (2) what diseases and genes should be included? (3) what is the validity and utility of gNBS? and (4) what are the ethical, legal, and social implications? Articles were only included if they generated new evidence; all opinion pieces were excluded. FINDINGS: In the 36 articles included, there was high concordance, except for gene disease inclusion, which was highly variable. Key findings were the need for equitable access, appropriate educational materials, and informed and flexible consent. The process for selecting genes for testing should be transparent and reflect that parents value the certainty of prediction over actionability. Data should be analyzed in a way that minimizes uncertainty and incidental findings. The expansion of traditional newborn screening (tNBS) to identify more life-threatening and treatable diseases needs to be balanced against the complexity of consenting parents of newborns for genomic testing as well as the risk that overall uptake of tNBS may decline. The literature reflected that the right of a child to self-determination should be valued more than the possibility of the whole family benefiting from a newborn genomic test. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this systematic review suggest that implementing gNBS will require a nuanced approach. There are gaps in our knowledge, such as the views of diverse populations, the capabilities of health systems, and health economic implications. It will be essential to rigorously evaluate outcomes and ensure programs can evolve to maximize benefit. American Medical Association 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8293022/ /pubmed/34283230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14336 Text en Copyright 2021 Downie L et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Downie, Lilian
Halliday, Jane
Lewis, Sharon
Amor, David J.
Principles of Genomic Newborn Screening Programs: A Systematic Review
title Principles of Genomic Newborn Screening Programs: A Systematic Review
title_full Principles of Genomic Newborn Screening Programs: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Principles of Genomic Newborn Screening Programs: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Principles of Genomic Newborn Screening Programs: A Systematic Review
title_short Principles of Genomic Newborn Screening Programs: A Systematic Review
title_sort principles of genomic newborn screening programs: a systematic review
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34283230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14336
work_keys_str_mv AT downielilian principlesofgenomicnewbornscreeningprogramsasystematicreview
AT hallidayjane principlesofgenomicnewbornscreeningprogramsasystematicreview
AT lewissharon principlesofgenomicnewbornscreeningprogramsasystematicreview
AT amordavidj principlesofgenomicnewbornscreeningprogramsasystematicreview