Cargando…

The Value of Cognitive Pretesting: Improving Validity and Revealing Blind Spots through the Development of a Newborn Screening Parent Experiences Survey

Surveys are used to gather a range of data on newborn screening (NBS) processes. We describe the development of a survey about parents’ NBS experiences, in the United States, informed by cognitive pretest interviews among parents with varying NBS test results (true-positive, false-positive, normal)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simon, Norma-Jean, Atkins, Anne, Miller, Brianne, Bonhomme, Natasha, Tarini, Beth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34287256
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns7030041
_version_ 1783724973459767296
author Simon, Norma-Jean
Atkins, Anne
Miller, Brianne
Bonhomme, Natasha
Tarini, Beth
author_facet Simon, Norma-Jean
Atkins, Anne
Miller, Brianne
Bonhomme, Natasha
Tarini, Beth
author_sort Simon, Norma-Jean
collection PubMed
description Surveys are used to gather a range of data on newborn screening (NBS) processes. We describe the development of a survey about parents’ NBS experiences, in the United States, informed by cognitive pretest interviews among parents with varying NBS test results (true-positive, false-positive, normal). Cognitive pretest interviews were conducted following a semi-structured script and notes were taken to identify problematic survey items. The study team met weekly to discuss pretest feedback, draft changes, and generate revised items. Pretests indicated that parent experiences with NBS are varied and NBS screening procedures are not well understood. Substantial modifications were made to survey questions concerning NBS testing and result communication. Pretesters often associated NBS with other tests/exams/scales—APGAR scores, Ages and Stages questionnaires, and genetic testing during pregnancy. Some pretesters recalled receiving NBS blood spot results during their hospital admission, an uncommon practice, and few recalled knowing results would be provided to them or their pediatrician in the first few weeks of life. Thorough explanations regarding NBS procedures and expectations were embedded within the survey to enhance and improve interpretation of survey questions. Future NBS experience surveys should utilize cognitive pretesting to capture divergent experiences and improve response validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8293165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82931652021-07-22 The Value of Cognitive Pretesting: Improving Validity and Revealing Blind Spots through the Development of a Newborn Screening Parent Experiences Survey Simon, Norma-Jean Atkins, Anne Miller, Brianne Bonhomme, Natasha Tarini, Beth Int J Neonatal Screen Article Surveys are used to gather a range of data on newborn screening (NBS) processes. We describe the development of a survey about parents’ NBS experiences, in the United States, informed by cognitive pretest interviews among parents with varying NBS test results (true-positive, false-positive, normal). Cognitive pretest interviews were conducted following a semi-structured script and notes were taken to identify problematic survey items. The study team met weekly to discuss pretest feedback, draft changes, and generate revised items. Pretests indicated that parent experiences with NBS are varied and NBS screening procedures are not well understood. Substantial modifications were made to survey questions concerning NBS testing and result communication. Pretesters often associated NBS with other tests/exams/scales—APGAR scores, Ages and Stages questionnaires, and genetic testing during pregnancy. Some pretesters recalled receiving NBS blood spot results during their hospital admission, an uncommon practice, and few recalled knowing results would be provided to them or their pediatrician in the first few weeks of life. Thorough explanations regarding NBS procedures and expectations were embedded within the survey to enhance and improve interpretation of survey questions. Future NBS experience surveys should utilize cognitive pretesting to capture divergent experiences and improve response validity. MDPI 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8293165/ /pubmed/34287256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns7030041 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Simon, Norma-Jean
Atkins, Anne
Miller, Brianne
Bonhomme, Natasha
Tarini, Beth
The Value of Cognitive Pretesting: Improving Validity and Revealing Blind Spots through the Development of a Newborn Screening Parent Experiences Survey
title The Value of Cognitive Pretesting: Improving Validity and Revealing Blind Spots through the Development of a Newborn Screening Parent Experiences Survey
title_full The Value of Cognitive Pretesting: Improving Validity and Revealing Blind Spots through the Development of a Newborn Screening Parent Experiences Survey
title_fullStr The Value of Cognitive Pretesting: Improving Validity and Revealing Blind Spots through the Development of a Newborn Screening Parent Experiences Survey
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Cognitive Pretesting: Improving Validity and Revealing Blind Spots through the Development of a Newborn Screening Parent Experiences Survey
title_short The Value of Cognitive Pretesting: Improving Validity and Revealing Blind Spots through the Development of a Newborn Screening Parent Experiences Survey
title_sort value of cognitive pretesting: improving validity and revealing blind spots through the development of a newborn screening parent experiences survey
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34287256
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns7030041
work_keys_str_mv AT simonnormajean thevalueofcognitivepretestingimprovingvalidityandrevealingblindspotsthroughthedevelopmentofanewbornscreeningparentexperiencessurvey
AT atkinsanne thevalueofcognitivepretestingimprovingvalidityandrevealingblindspotsthroughthedevelopmentofanewbornscreeningparentexperiencessurvey
AT millerbrianne thevalueofcognitivepretestingimprovingvalidityandrevealingblindspotsthroughthedevelopmentofanewbornscreeningparentexperiencessurvey
AT bonhommenatasha thevalueofcognitivepretestingimprovingvalidityandrevealingblindspotsthroughthedevelopmentofanewbornscreeningparentexperiencessurvey
AT tarinibeth thevalueofcognitivepretestingimprovingvalidityandrevealingblindspotsthroughthedevelopmentofanewbornscreeningparentexperiencessurvey
AT simonnormajean valueofcognitivepretestingimprovingvalidityandrevealingblindspotsthroughthedevelopmentofanewbornscreeningparentexperiencessurvey
AT atkinsanne valueofcognitivepretestingimprovingvalidityandrevealingblindspotsthroughthedevelopmentofanewbornscreeningparentexperiencessurvey
AT millerbrianne valueofcognitivepretestingimprovingvalidityandrevealingblindspotsthroughthedevelopmentofanewbornscreeningparentexperiencessurvey
AT bonhommenatasha valueofcognitivepretestingimprovingvalidityandrevealingblindspotsthroughthedevelopmentofanewbornscreeningparentexperiencessurvey
AT tarinibeth valueofcognitivepretestingimprovingvalidityandrevealingblindspotsthroughthedevelopmentofanewbornscreeningparentexperiencessurvey