Cargando…

Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer

BACKGROUND: Few studies have explored the optimal examined lymph node count and lymph node density cutoff values that could be used to predict the survival of patients with penile cancer. We further clarify the prognostic value of lymph node density and examined lymph node count in penile cancer. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Pan, Zhu, Tianle, Gao, Jingjing, Li, Hu, Liu, Xi, Zhang, Xiansheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307174
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.706531
_version_ 1783725004725157888
author Gao, Pan
Zhu, Tianle
Gao, Jingjing
Li, Hu
Liu, Xi
Zhang, Xiansheng
author_facet Gao, Pan
Zhu, Tianle
Gao, Jingjing
Li, Hu
Liu, Xi
Zhang, Xiansheng
author_sort Gao, Pan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have explored the optimal examined lymph node count and lymph node density cutoff values that could be used to predict the survival of patients with penile cancer. We further clarify the prognostic value of lymph node density and examined lymph node count in penile cancer. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was explored to recruit penile cancer patients from 2010 to 2015. A retrospective analysis of penile cancer patients’ data from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University was performed for verification (2006–2016). The cutoff values of examined lymph node count and lymph node density were performed according to the ROC curve. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare survival differences among different groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to determine the significant variables. On the basis of Cox proportional hazards regression model, a nomogram was established and validated by calibration plot diagrams and concordance index (C-index). RESULTS: A total of 528 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cohort and 156 patients in the Chinese cohort were included in this study. Using the ROC curve, we found that the recommended cutoff values of ELN and LND were 13 and 9.3%, respectively (P <0.001). Kaplan–Meier curves suggested the significant differences of overall survival among different examined lymph nodes and lymph node density. Multivariate analysis indicated ELN and LND were independent prognostic factor for OS of penile cancer patients. Nomogram showed the contribution of ELN and LND to predicting OS was large. The C-index at 3-, and 5-year were 0.744 for overall survival (95% CI 0.711–0.777). CONCLUSIONS: The more lymph nodes examined, the lower the density of lymph nodes, and the higher the long-term survival rate of penile cancer. We recommended 13 examined lymph nodes and lymph node density >9.3% as the cutoff value for evaluating the prognosis of penile cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8293298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82932982021-07-22 Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer Gao, Pan Zhu, Tianle Gao, Jingjing Li, Hu Liu, Xi Zhang, Xiansheng Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Few studies have explored the optimal examined lymph node count and lymph node density cutoff values that could be used to predict the survival of patients with penile cancer. We further clarify the prognostic value of lymph node density and examined lymph node count in penile cancer. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was explored to recruit penile cancer patients from 2010 to 2015. A retrospective analysis of penile cancer patients’ data from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University was performed for verification (2006–2016). The cutoff values of examined lymph node count and lymph node density were performed according to the ROC curve. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare survival differences among different groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to determine the significant variables. On the basis of Cox proportional hazards regression model, a nomogram was established and validated by calibration plot diagrams and concordance index (C-index). RESULTS: A total of 528 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cohort and 156 patients in the Chinese cohort were included in this study. Using the ROC curve, we found that the recommended cutoff values of ELN and LND were 13 and 9.3%, respectively (P <0.001). Kaplan–Meier curves suggested the significant differences of overall survival among different examined lymph nodes and lymph node density. Multivariate analysis indicated ELN and LND were independent prognostic factor for OS of penile cancer patients. Nomogram showed the contribution of ELN and LND to predicting OS was large. The C-index at 3-, and 5-year were 0.744 for overall survival (95% CI 0.711–0.777). CONCLUSIONS: The more lymph nodes examined, the lower the density of lymph nodes, and the higher the long-term survival rate of penile cancer. We recommended 13 examined lymph nodes and lymph node density >9.3% as the cutoff value for evaluating the prognosis of penile cancer patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8293298/ /pubmed/34307174 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.706531 Text en Copyright © 2021 Gao, Zhu, Gao, Li, Liu and Zhang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Gao, Pan
Zhu, Tianle
Gao, Jingjing
Li, Hu
Liu, Xi
Zhang, Xiansheng
Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer
title Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer
title_full Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer
title_fullStr Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer
title_short Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer
title_sort impact of examined lymph node count and lymph node density on overall survival of penile cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307174
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.706531
work_keys_str_mv AT gaopan impactofexaminedlymphnodecountandlymphnodedensityonoverallsurvivalofpenilecancer
AT zhutianle impactofexaminedlymphnodecountandlymphnodedensityonoverallsurvivalofpenilecancer
AT gaojingjing impactofexaminedlymphnodecountandlymphnodedensityonoverallsurvivalofpenilecancer
AT lihu impactofexaminedlymphnodecountandlymphnodedensityonoverallsurvivalofpenilecancer
AT liuxi impactofexaminedlymphnodecountandlymphnodedensityonoverallsurvivalofpenilecancer
AT zhangxiansheng impactofexaminedlymphnodecountandlymphnodedensityonoverallsurvivalofpenilecancer