Cargando…

Cancer and Thrombosis: New Treatments, New Challenges

The direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) has become an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. The clinicians are, however, faced with difficult decisions regarding DOAC treatment: Which patients cannot u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dahm, Anders Erik Astrup
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci9020041
_version_ 1783725007799582720
author Dahm, Anders Erik Astrup
author_facet Dahm, Anders Erik Astrup
author_sort Dahm, Anders Erik Astrup
collection PubMed
description The direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) has become an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. The clinicians are, however, faced with difficult decisions regarding DOAC treatment: Which patients cannot use DOACs? Should incidental VTE be treated similar to symptomatic VTE? Is it safe to give DOACs to patients with gastrointestinal or urogenital cancers? How about drug–drug interactions? Should all cancer patients receive thromboprophylaxis? Is arterial thrombosis a problem? The current article reviews the available literature regarding these questions and aims to provide practical solutions based on data from the clinical trials and new guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8293316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82933162021-07-22 Cancer and Thrombosis: New Treatments, New Challenges Dahm, Anders Erik Astrup Med Sci (Basel) Review The direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) has become an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. The clinicians are, however, faced with difficult decisions regarding DOAC treatment: Which patients cannot use DOACs? Should incidental VTE be treated similar to symptomatic VTE? Is it safe to give DOACs to patients with gastrointestinal or urogenital cancers? How about drug–drug interactions? Should all cancer patients receive thromboprophylaxis? Is arterial thrombosis a problem? The current article reviews the available literature regarding these questions and aims to provide practical solutions based on data from the clinical trials and new guidelines. MDPI 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8293316/ /pubmed/34204957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci9020041 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Dahm, Anders Erik Astrup
Cancer and Thrombosis: New Treatments, New Challenges
title Cancer and Thrombosis: New Treatments, New Challenges
title_full Cancer and Thrombosis: New Treatments, New Challenges
title_fullStr Cancer and Thrombosis: New Treatments, New Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Cancer and Thrombosis: New Treatments, New Challenges
title_short Cancer and Thrombosis: New Treatments, New Challenges
title_sort cancer and thrombosis: new treatments, new challenges
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci9020041
work_keys_str_mv AT dahmanderserikastrup cancerandthrombosisnewtreatmentsnewchallenges