Cargando…

Safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: There has been an exponential growth in the number of clinical research studies regarding exercise training in multiple sclerosis, and literature reviews and meta-analyses have documented the many benefits of exercise training. This research further requires careful review for documentin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Learmonth, Y. C., Pilutti, L. A., Herring, M. P., Motl, R. W., Chan, B., Metse, A. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34284811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01751-0
_version_ 1783725056973602816
author Learmonth, Y. C.
Pilutti, L. A.
Herring, M. P.
Motl, R. W.
Chan, B.
Metse, A. P.
author_facet Learmonth, Y. C.
Pilutti, L. A.
Herring, M. P.
Motl, R. W.
Chan, B.
Metse, A. P.
author_sort Learmonth, Y. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been an exponential growth in the number of clinical research studies regarding exercise training in multiple sclerosis, and literature reviews and meta-analyses have documented the many benefits of exercise training. This research further requires careful review for documenting the safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis, as clarity on safety represents a major hurdle in the clinical prescription of exercise behaviour. OBJECTIVES: To enhance understanding of the feasibility of exercise in multiple sclerosis, we (1) provide a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis that summarises rates and risks of clinical relapse, adverse events (i.e., an unfavourable outcome that occurs during the intervention delivery time period), and serious adverse events (i.e., an untoward occurrence that results in death or is life threatening, requires hospitalisation, or results in disability during the intervention delivery time period), as well as retention, adherence, and compliance, from randomised controlled trials of exercise training in persons with multiple sclerosis; and (2) identify moderators of relapse, adverse events, and serious adverse event rates. METHODS: Eight field-relevant databases will be searched electronically. Studies that involve a randomised controlled trial of exercise training (with non-exercise, non-pharmacological, comparator), report on safety outcomes, and include adults with multiple sclerosis will be included. Rates and relative risks of the three primary outcomes (relapse, adverse event, and serious adverse event) will be calculated and reported each with standard error and 95% confidence interval. Random-effects meta-analysis will estimate mean population relative risk for outcomes. Potential sources of variability, including participant characteristics, features of the exercise stimulus, and comparison condition, will be examined with random-effects meta-regression with maximum likelihood estimation. DISCUSSION: The results from this systematic review and meta-analysis will inform and guide healthcare practitioners, researchers, and policymakers on the safety of exercise training in persons with multiple sclerosis. Where possible, we will identify the impact of exercise type, exercise delivery style, participant disability level, and the prescription of exercise guidelines, on the safety of exercise training. The result will identify critical information on the safety of exercise in persons with multiple sclerosis, while also identifying gaps in research and setting priorities for future enquiries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020190544 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01751-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8293520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82935202021-07-21 Safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis Learmonth, Y. C. Pilutti, L. A. Herring, M. P. Motl, R. W. Chan, B. Metse, A. P. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: There has been an exponential growth in the number of clinical research studies regarding exercise training in multiple sclerosis, and literature reviews and meta-analyses have documented the many benefits of exercise training. This research further requires careful review for documenting the safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis, as clarity on safety represents a major hurdle in the clinical prescription of exercise behaviour. OBJECTIVES: To enhance understanding of the feasibility of exercise in multiple sclerosis, we (1) provide a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis that summarises rates and risks of clinical relapse, adverse events (i.e., an unfavourable outcome that occurs during the intervention delivery time period), and serious adverse events (i.e., an untoward occurrence that results in death or is life threatening, requires hospitalisation, or results in disability during the intervention delivery time period), as well as retention, adherence, and compliance, from randomised controlled trials of exercise training in persons with multiple sclerosis; and (2) identify moderators of relapse, adverse events, and serious adverse event rates. METHODS: Eight field-relevant databases will be searched electronically. Studies that involve a randomised controlled trial of exercise training (with non-exercise, non-pharmacological, comparator), report on safety outcomes, and include adults with multiple sclerosis will be included. Rates and relative risks of the three primary outcomes (relapse, adverse event, and serious adverse event) will be calculated and reported each with standard error and 95% confidence interval. Random-effects meta-analysis will estimate mean population relative risk for outcomes. Potential sources of variability, including participant characteristics, features of the exercise stimulus, and comparison condition, will be examined with random-effects meta-regression with maximum likelihood estimation. DISCUSSION: The results from this systematic review and meta-analysis will inform and guide healthcare practitioners, researchers, and policymakers on the safety of exercise training in persons with multiple sclerosis. Where possible, we will identify the impact of exercise type, exercise delivery style, participant disability level, and the prescription of exercise guidelines, on the safety of exercise training. The result will identify critical information on the safety of exercise in persons with multiple sclerosis, while also identifying gaps in research and setting priorities for future enquiries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020190544 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01751-0. BioMed Central 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8293520/ /pubmed/34284811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01751-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Learmonth, Y. C.
Pilutti, L. A.
Herring, M. P.
Motl, R. W.
Chan, B.
Metse, A. P.
Safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title Safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34284811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01751-0
work_keys_str_mv AT learmonthyc safetyofexercisetraininginmultiplesclerosisaprotocolforanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT piluttila safetyofexercisetraininginmultiplesclerosisaprotocolforanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT herringmp safetyofexercisetraininginmultiplesclerosisaprotocolforanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT motlrw safetyofexercisetraininginmultiplesclerosisaprotocolforanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chanb safetyofexercisetraininginmultiplesclerosisaprotocolforanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT metseap safetyofexercisetraininginmultiplesclerosisaprotocolforanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis