Cargando…
A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination
BACKGROUND: Technological advances have previously been hailed as a new dawn in Higher Education, with the advent of ‘massive open online courses’ (MOOCs) and online learning. Virtual platforms have potential advantages such as accessibility and availability but simply transferring educational mater...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34284771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02822-5 |
_version_ | 1783725067411128320 |
---|---|
author | Brewer, P. E. Racy, M. Hampton, M. Mushtaq, F. Tomlinson, J. E. Ali, F. M. |
author_facet | Brewer, P. E. Racy, M. Hampton, M. Mushtaq, F. Tomlinson, J. E. Ali, F. M. |
author_sort | Brewer, P. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Technological advances have previously been hailed as a new dawn in Higher Education, with the advent of ‘massive open online courses’ (MOOCs) and online learning. Virtual platforms have potential advantages such as accessibility and availability but simply transferring educational material to the online environment may not ensure high quality learning. Clinical examination is a fundamental principle of medical assessment, and this study aimed to assess the role of technology in teaching these skills. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To determine whether three teaching modalities were of equal efficacy in teaching examination of the shoulder joint to naïve medical students. METHODS: Sixty-seven pre-clinical medical students naïve to large joint examination were recruited. Participants completed a learning style questionnaire and were then block randomised to three study: textbook study, face-to-face seminar, or video tutorial via online platform. The same examination technique was taught in all groups, with the intervention being the method of delivery All second year students were eligible for inclusion. The single exclusion criteria was previous exposure to clinical examination teaching. Students were assessed using a standardised scoring system at baseline (pre-intervention), and days 5 and 19 post-intervention (maximum score 30). Assessors were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was assessment score at day 5 post intervention. RESULTS: There was no difference between the three groups at baseline assessment (mean scores 2.4 for textbook, 2.8 for face-to-face, and 3.1 for video; p = 0.267). Mean post-intervention scores were 16.5 textbook, 25.5 face-to-face, and 22.4 video (p < 0.001, η(2) = .449). There was no change between day 5 and day 19 post-intervention assessment scores in any group (p = 0.373), Preferred learning style did not affect scores (p = 0.543). CONCLUSION: Face-to-face teaching was the most effective method for teaching clinical examination of the shoulder. Technology can potentially increase accessibility and remove geographic barriers, but is not as effective if teaching techniques are simply mirrored in an online format. Online platforms allow in depth data analysis of how learners interact with educational material and this may have value in improving the design of online educational materials, and is a potential area for further research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02822-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8293563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82935632021-07-21 A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination Brewer, P. E. Racy, M. Hampton, M. Mushtaq, F. Tomlinson, J. E. Ali, F. M. BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Technological advances have previously been hailed as a new dawn in Higher Education, with the advent of ‘massive open online courses’ (MOOCs) and online learning. Virtual platforms have potential advantages such as accessibility and availability but simply transferring educational material to the online environment may not ensure high quality learning. Clinical examination is a fundamental principle of medical assessment, and this study aimed to assess the role of technology in teaching these skills. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To determine whether three teaching modalities were of equal efficacy in teaching examination of the shoulder joint to naïve medical students. METHODS: Sixty-seven pre-clinical medical students naïve to large joint examination were recruited. Participants completed a learning style questionnaire and were then block randomised to three study: textbook study, face-to-face seminar, or video tutorial via online platform. The same examination technique was taught in all groups, with the intervention being the method of delivery All second year students were eligible for inclusion. The single exclusion criteria was previous exposure to clinical examination teaching. Students were assessed using a standardised scoring system at baseline (pre-intervention), and days 5 and 19 post-intervention (maximum score 30). Assessors were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was assessment score at day 5 post intervention. RESULTS: There was no difference between the three groups at baseline assessment (mean scores 2.4 for textbook, 2.8 for face-to-face, and 3.1 for video; p = 0.267). Mean post-intervention scores were 16.5 textbook, 25.5 face-to-face, and 22.4 video (p < 0.001, η(2) = .449). There was no change between day 5 and day 19 post-intervention assessment scores in any group (p = 0.373), Preferred learning style did not affect scores (p = 0.543). CONCLUSION: Face-to-face teaching was the most effective method for teaching clinical examination of the shoulder. Technology can potentially increase accessibility and remove geographic barriers, but is not as effective if teaching techniques are simply mirrored in an online format. Online platforms allow in depth data analysis of how learners interact with educational material and this may have value in improving the design of online educational materials, and is a potential area for further research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02822-5. BioMed Central 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8293563/ /pubmed/34284771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02822-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Brewer, P. E. Racy, M. Hampton, M. Mushtaq, F. Tomlinson, J. E. Ali, F. M. A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination |
title | A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination |
title_full | A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination |
title_fullStr | A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination |
title_full_unstemmed | A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination |
title_short | A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination |
title_sort | three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34284771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02822-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brewerpe athreearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination AT racym athreearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination AT hamptonm athreearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination AT mushtaqf athreearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination AT tomlinsonje athreearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination AT alifm athreearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination AT brewerpe threearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination AT racym threearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination AT hamptonm threearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination AT mushtaqf threearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination AT tomlinsonje threearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination AT alifm threearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination |