Cargando…

A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination

BACKGROUND: Technological advances have previously been hailed as a new dawn in Higher Education, with the advent of ‘massive open online courses’ (MOOCs) and online learning. Virtual platforms have potential advantages such as accessibility and availability but simply transferring educational mater...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brewer, P. E., Racy, M., Hampton, M., Mushtaq, F., Tomlinson, J. E., Ali, F. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34284771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02822-5
_version_ 1783725067411128320
author Brewer, P. E.
Racy, M.
Hampton, M.
Mushtaq, F.
Tomlinson, J. E.
Ali, F. M.
author_facet Brewer, P. E.
Racy, M.
Hampton, M.
Mushtaq, F.
Tomlinson, J. E.
Ali, F. M.
author_sort Brewer, P. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Technological advances have previously been hailed as a new dawn in Higher Education, with the advent of ‘massive open online courses’ (MOOCs) and online learning. Virtual platforms have potential advantages such as accessibility and availability but simply transferring educational material to the online environment may not ensure high quality learning. Clinical examination is a fundamental principle of medical assessment, and this study aimed to assess the role of technology in teaching these skills. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To determine whether three teaching modalities were of equal efficacy in teaching examination of the shoulder joint to naïve medical students. METHODS: Sixty-seven pre-clinical medical students naïve to large joint examination were recruited. Participants completed a learning style questionnaire and were then block randomised to three study: textbook study, face-to-face seminar, or video tutorial via online platform. The same examination technique was taught in all groups, with the intervention being the method of delivery All second year students were eligible for inclusion. The single exclusion criteria was previous exposure to clinical examination teaching. Students were assessed using a standardised scoring system at baseline (pre-intervention), and days 5 and 19 post-intervention (maximum score 30). Assessors were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was assessment score at day 5 post intervention. RESULTS: There was no difference between the three groups at baseline assessment (mean scores 2.4 for textbook, 2.8 for face-to-face, and 3.1 for video; p = 0.267). Mean post-intervention scores were 16.5 textbook, 25.5 face-to-face, and 22.4 video (p < 0.001, η(2) = .449). There was no change between day 5 and day 19 post-intervention assessment scores in any group (p = 0.373), Preferred learning style did not affect scores (p = 0.543). CONCLUSION: Face-to-face teaching was the most effective method for teaching clinical examination of the shoulder. Technology can potentially increase accessibility and remove geographic barriers, but is not as effective if teaching techniques are simply mirrored in an online format. Online platforms allow in depth data analysis of how learners interact with educational material and this may have value in improving the design of online educational materials, and is a potential area for further research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02822-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8293563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82935632021-07-21 A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination Brewer, P. E. Racy, M. Hampton, M. Mushtaq, F. Tomlinson, J. E. Ali, F. M. BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Technological advances have previously been hailed as a new dawn in Higher Education, with the advent of ‘massive open online courses’ (MOOCs) and online learning. Virtual platforms have potential advantages such as accessibility and availability but simply transferring educational material to the online environment may not ensure high quality learning. Clinical examination is a fundamental principle of medical assessment, and this study aimed to assess the role of technology in teaching these skills. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To determine whether three teaching modalities were of equal efficacy in teaching examination of the shoulder joint to naïve medical students. METHODS: Sixty-seven pre-clinical medical students naïve to large joint examination were recruited. Participants completed a learning style questionnaire and were then block randomised to three study: textbook study, face-to-face seminar, or video tutorial via online platform. The same examination technique was taught in all groups, with the intervention being the method of delivery All second year students were eligible for inclusion. The single exclusion criteria was previous exposure to clinical examination teaching. Students were assessed using a standardised scoring system at baseline (pre-intervention), and days 5 and 19 post-intervention (maximum score 30). Assessors were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was assessment score at day 5 post intervention. RESULTS: There was no difference between the three groups at baseline assessment (mean scores 2.4 for textbook, 2.8 for face-to-face, and 3.1 for video; p = 0.267). Mean post-intervention scores were 16.5 textbook, 25.5 face-to-face, and 22.4 video (p < 0.001, η(2) = .449). There was no change between day 5 and day 19 post-intervention assessment scores in any group (p = 0.373), Preferred learning style did not affect scores (p = 0.543). CONCLUSION: Face-to-face teaching was the most effective method for teaching clinical examination of the shoulder. Technology can potentially increase accessibility and remove geographic barriers, but is not as effective if teaching techniques are simply mirrored in an online format. Online platforms allow in depth data analysis of how learners interact with educational material and this may have value in improving the design of online educational materials, and is a potential area for further research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02822-5. BioMed Central 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8293563/ /pubmed/34284771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02822-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Brewer, P. E.
Racy, M.
Hampton, M.
Mushtaq, F.
Tomlinson, J. E.
Ali, F. M.
A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination
title A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination
title_full A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination
title_fullStr A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination
title_full_unstemmed A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination
title_short A three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination
title_sort three-arm single blind randomised control trial of naïve medical students performing a shoulder joint clinical examination
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34284771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02822-5
work_keys_str_mv AT brewerpe athreearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination
AT racym athreearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination
AT hamptonm athreearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination
AT mushtaqf athreearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination
AT tomlinsonje athreearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination
AT alifm athreearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination
AT brewerpe threearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination
AT racym threearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination
AT hamptonm threearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination
AT mushtaqf threearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination
AT tomlinsonje threearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination
AT alifm threearmsingleblindrandomisedcontroltrialofnaivemedicalstudentsperformingashoulderjointclinicalexamination