Cargando…
Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure
BACKGROUND: Catastrophic cognitive appraisals, similar to those in anxiety disorders, are implicated in depersonalisation, a form of dissociation. No scales exist to measure appraisals of dissociative experiences. Dissociation is common in psychosis. Misinterpretations of dissociative experiences ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465820000958 |
_version_ | 1783725081087705088 |
---|---|
author | Černis, Emma Bird, Jessica C. Molodynski, Andrew Ehlers, Anke Freeman, Daniel |
author_facet | Černis, Emma Bird, Jessica C. Molodynski, Andrew Ehlers, Anke Freeman, Daniel |
author_sort | Černis, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Catastrophic cognitive appraisals, similar to those in anxiety disorders, are implicated in depersonalisation, a form of dissociation. No scales exist to measure appraisals of dissociative experiences. Dissociation is common in psychosis. Misinterpretations of dissociative experiences may maintain psychotic symptoms. Therefore, assessing appraisals in this context may be valuable. AIMS: The primary aim was to develop a measure of key appraisals of dissociation in psychosis. Secondary aims were to test the relationship between appraisals and psychotic experiences (paranoia and hallucinations), and determine whether appraisals explain additional variance in psychotic symptoms above dissociative symptoms. METHOD: Fifty items were generated from transcripts of interviews with patients. The measure was developed and psychometrically validated via factor analysis of data from 9902 general population participants and 1026 patients with psychosis. Convergent validity, test–re-test reliability, and internal reliability were assessed. Regression analyses tested relationships with psychotic symptoms. RESULTS: A 13-item single-factor measure was developed. Factor analysis indicated good model fit [χ(2)(65) = 247.173, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.960, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.052]. The scale had good convergent validity with a rumination (non-clinical: r = 0.71; clinical: r = 0.73) and dissociation measure (r = 0.81; r = 0.80), high internal consistency (α = 0.93; α = 0.93), and excellent 1-week test–re-test reliability [intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.90]. It explained variance in psychotic symptoms (paranoia: 36.4%; hallucinations: 35.0%), including additional variance compared with dissociation alone (paranoia: 5.3%; hallucinations: 2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The Cognitive Appraisals of Dissociation in Psychosis (CAD-P) measure is a psychometrically robust scale identifying appraisals of dissociative experiences in psychosis and is associated with the presence of psychotic experiences. It is likely to prove useful for clinical assessment and research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8293624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82936242021-08-03 Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure Černis, Emma Bird, Jessica C. Molodynski, Andrew Ehlers, Anke Freeman, Daniel Behav Cogn Psychother Main BACKGROUND: Catastrophic cognitive appraisals, similar to those in anxiety disorders, are implicated in depersonalisation, a form of dissociation. No scales exist to measure appraisals of dissociative experiences. Dissociation is common in psychosis. Misinterpretations of dissociative experiences may maintain psychotic symptoms. Therefore, assessing appraisals in this context may be valuable. AIMS: The primary aim was to develop a measure of key appraisals of dissociation in psychosis. Secondary aims were to test the relationship between appraisals and psychotic experiences (paranoia and hallucinations), and determine whether appraisals explain additional variance in psychotic symptoms above dissociative symptoms. METHOD: Fifty items were generated from transcripts of interviews with patients. The measure was developed and psychometrically validated via factor analysis of data from 9902 general population participants and 1026 patients with psychosis. Convergent validity, test–re-test reliability, and internal reliability were assessed. Regression analyses tested relationships with psychotic symptoms. RESULTS: A 13-item single-factor measure was developed. Factor analysis indicated good model fit [χ(2)(65) = 247.173, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.960, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.052]. The scale had good convergent validity with a rumination (non-clinical: r = 0.71; clinical: r = 0.73) and dissociation measure (r = 0.81; r = 0.80), high internal consistency (α = 0.93; α = 0.93), and excellent 1-week test–re-test reliability [intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.90]. It explained variance in psychotic symptoms (paranoia: 36.4%; hallucinations: 35.0%), including additional variance compared with dissociation alone (paranoia: 5.3%; hallucinations: 2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The Cognitive Appraisals of Dissociation in Psychosis (CAD-P) measure is a psychometrically robust scale identifying appraisals of dissociative experiences in psychosis and is associated with the presence of psychotic experiences. It is likely to prove useful for clinical assessment and research. Cambridge University Press 2021-07 2020-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8293624/ /pubmed/33446299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465820000958 Text en © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Main Černis, Emma Bird, Jessica C. Molodynski, Andrew Ehlers, Anke Freeman, Daniel Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure |
title | Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure |
title_full | Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure |
title_fullStr | Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure |
title_short | Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure |
title_sort | cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure |
topic | Main |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465820000958 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cernisemma cognitiveappraisalsofdissociationinpsychosisanewbriefmeasure AT birdjessicac cognitiveappraisalsofdissociationinpsychosisanewbriefmeasure AT molodynskiandrew cognitiveappraisalsofdissociationinpsychosisanewbriefmeasure AT ehlersanke cognitiveappraisalsofdissociationinpsychosisanewbriefmeasure AT freemandaniel cognitiveappraisalsofdissociationinpsychosisanewbriefmeasure |