Cargando…

Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure

BACKGROUND: Catastrophic cognitive appraisals, similar to those in anxiety disorders, are implicated in depersonalisation, a form of dissociation. No scales exist to measure appraisals of dissociative experiences. Dissociation is common in psychosis. Misinterpretations of dissociative experiences ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Černis, Emma, Bird, Jessica C., Molodynski, Andrew, Ehlers, Anke, Freeman, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465820000958
_version_ 1783725081087705088
author Černis, Emma
Bird, Jessica C.
Molodynski, Andrew
Ehlers, Anke
Freeman, Daniel
author_facet Černis, Emma
Bird, Jessica C.
Molodynski, Andrew
Ehlers, Anke
Freeman, Daniel
author_sort Černis, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Catastrophic cognitive appraisals, similar to those in anxiety disorders, are implicated in depersonalisation, a form of dissociation. No scales exist to measure appraisals of dissociative experiences. Dissociation is common in psychosis. Misinterpretations of dissociative experiences may maintain psychotic symptoms. Therefore, assessing appraisals in this context may be valuable. AIMS: The primary aim was to develop a measure of key appraisals of dissociation in psychosis. Secondary aims were to test the relationship between appraisals and psychotic experiences (paranoia and hallucinations), and determine whether appraisals explain additional variance in psychotic symptoms above dissociative symptoms. METHOD: Fifty items were generated from transcripts of interviews with patients. The measure was developed and psychometrically validated via factor analysis of data from 9902 general population participants and 1026 patients with psychosis. Convergent validity, test–re-test reliability, and internal reliability were assessed. Regression analyses tested relationships with psychotic symptoms. RESULTS: A 13-item single-factor measure was developed. Factor analysis indicated good model fit [χ(2)(65) = 247.173, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.960, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.052]. The scale had good convergent validity with a rumination (non-clinical: r = 0.71; clinical: r = 0.73) and dissociation measure (r = 0.81; r = 0.80), high internal consistency (α = 0.93; α = 0.93), and excellent 1-week test–re-test reliability [intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.90]. It explained variance in psychotic symptoms (paranoia: 36.4%; hallucinations: 35.0%), including additional variance compared with dissociation alone (paranoia: 5.3%; hallucinations: 2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The Cognitive Appraisals of Dissociation in Psychosis (CAD-P) measure is a psychometrically robust scale identifying appraisals of dissociative experiences in psychosis and is associated with the presence of psychotic experiences. It is likely to prove useful for clinical assessment and research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8293624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82936242021-08-03 Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure Černis, Emma Bird, Jessica C. Molodynski, Andrew Ehlers, Anke Freeman, Daniel Behav Cogn Psychother Main BACKGROUND: Catastrophic cognitive appraisals, similar to those in anxiety disorders, are implicated in depersonalisation, a form of dissociation. No scales exist to measure appraisals of dissociative experiences. Dissociation is common in psychosis. Misinterpretations of dissociative experiences may maintain psychotic symptoms. Therefore, assessing appraisals in this context may be valuable. AIMS: The primary aim was to develop a measure of key appraisals of dissociation in psychosis. Secondary aims were to test the relationship between appraisals and psychotic experiences (paranoia and hallucinations), and determine whether appraisals explain additional variance in psychotic symptoms above dissociative symptoms. METHOD: Fifty items were generated from transcripts of interviews with patients. The measure was developed and psychometrically validated via factor analysis of data from 9902 general population participants and 1026 patients with psychosis. Convergent validity, test–re-test reliability, and internal reliability were assessed. Regression analyses tested relationships with psychotic symptoms. RESULTS: A 13-item single-factor measure was developed. Factor analysis indicated good model fit [χ(2)(65) = 247.173, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.960, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.052]. The scale had good convergent validity with a rumination (non-clinical: r = 0.71; clinical: r = 0.73) and dissociation measure (r = 0.81; r = 0.80), high internal consistency (α = 0.93; α = 0.93), and excellent 1-week test–re-test reliability [intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.90]. It explained variance in psychotic symptoms (paranoia: 36.4%; hallucinations: 35.0%), including additional variance compared with dissociation alone (paranoia: 5.3%; hallucinations: 2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The Cognitive Appraisals of Dissociation in Psychosis (CAD-P) measure is a psychometrically robust scale identifying appraisals of dissociative experiences in psychosis and is associated with the presence of psychotic experiences. It is likely to prove useful for clinical assessment and research. Cambridge University Press 2021-07 2020-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8293624/ /pubmed/33446299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465820000958 Text en © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Main
Černis, Emma
Bird, Jessica C.
Molodynski, Andrew
Ehlers, Anke
Freeman, Daniel
Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure
title Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure
title_full Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure
title_fullStr Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure
title_short Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure
title_sort cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure
topic Main
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465820000958
work_keys_str_mv AT cernisemma cognitiveappraisalsofdissociationinpsychosisanewbriefmeasure
AT birdjessicac cognitiveappraisalsofdissociationinpsychosisanewbriefmeasure
AT molodynskiandrew cognitiveappraisalsofdissociationinpsychosisanewbriefmeasure
AT ehlersanke cognitiveappraisalsofdissociationinpsychosisanewbriefmeasure
AT freemandaniel cognitiveappraisalsofdissociationinpsychosisanewbriefmeasure